Government Post – Is the American Brand Better Than Ours?

The Myth of the Post Office, or a Tale of Postal Perfidy

On February 15, I ordered an out of print pamphlet from an online bookseller called Oddball Books, based in La La Land, People’s Democratic, Liberated, Socialized, Tummy Tucked and Sometimes Electrified Republic of California. I requested that it be sent to my post office box here in the People’s Hillaryized Republic of Gotham. Oddball duly informed me by e-mail that it was mailed through the Post Office’s Priority Mail service on Friday, February 16. Impressed by the efficiency of private enterprise, but aware that using the government’s mail was risky business, I eagerly anticipated the arrival of a rare work by Frank Chodorov, albeit with some uneasiness. This would fill a lacuna in my library, and amuse the dust mites that call it home.

Priority Mail advertises two to three-day delivery, so I expected to receive it by Wednesday, February 21. In the past the Post Office has fraudulently compared this service with FedEx and UPS, despite the fact that the latter have online tracking and real accountability, something that is as alien to the Post Office as honesty is to a politician, and as the love of liberty is to a Puritan. After two weeks elapsed without receiving the package, I e-mailed Oddball inquiring after its whereabouts. The proprietor responded that he would check with the Post Office.

Now, I am not a conspiracy theorist, despite the best efforts of Murray Rothbard and Lew Rockwell to demonstrate that history does not proceed in vacuo, and that real people (government miscreants and their crony capitalist friends) have reasons to thwart the free market for their own gain, and to cover their tracks with bogus court history. But when I identify the missing pamphlet as “The Myth of the Post Office,” you might understand my suspicion that maybe there is a conspiracy afoot, with the Post Office as Ground Zero.

A few days later, the proprietor of the book service informed me that he had insured the package and was filling out forms that the Post Office required to conduct its own investigation. (A Post Office investigation of a botched delivery sounds like a military war crimes tribunal you wonder who should be investigating whom.) He was going to send me some forms to fill out also. Great! Would they be in triplicate? As of about two weeks later, April 3, I haven’t received them. Maybe they have a worse service than Priority Mail! Sounds like they ll need two investigations, and a slightly bigger budget to cover both. And don’t forget — yet more funding to cover the cost of the lost paperwork. (That big tax reduction proposed by Jim Ostrowski appears to be in some jeopardy, and we haven’t even got to the Department of Labor [which does no labor]. After all, it costs the Post Office at least 50 percent more than private enterprise to deliver a package.)

A couple of days ago, I requested a refund, which I hope to receive soon. I also informed Oddball of my thinking about insuring packages entrusted to the Post Office. It occurred to me that such a practice is similar to posting a sign in front of a bank that says “No Guards or Security Systems Inside,” which would be an open sesame to bank robbers. Flagging a package sent through the government’s snail mail for insurance tells a postal bureaucrook that it’s a valuable package. Which Priority Mail package is he going to steal one that’s uninsured or one that’s insured? The irony is, as I pointed out to Oddball, that the package probably would have had a better chance of arriving safely uninsured.

At least I have a reprint of “The Myth of the Post Office,” which appeared as chapter 16 in Frank Chodorov’s book One Is a Crowd: Reflections of an Individualist. There is some consolation in rereading this essay now. It seems that I also have to go back to school on conspiracy theories, starting with the Rockwell-edited collection The Irrepressible Rothbard. And I’m having UPS deliver this time, because a tome is a terrible thing to waste, especially on a mindless bureaucrook.

From Lew Rockwell, here.

The Mitzvah to Not Get Poor

As a continuation of our previous “The Mitzva to Get Rich“…

Instead of dutifully detailing “לא יהיה בך אביון“, I will present a valuable Rashba you may have overlooked.

Bava Kama 9a – 9b:

א”ר זירא אמר רב הונא במצוה עד שליש מאי שליש אילימא שליש ביתו אלא מעתה אי איתרמי ליה תלתא מצותא ליתיב לכוליה ביתיה אלא אמר רבי זירא בהידור מצוה עד שליש במצוה

:Rashba idem

מהא דאמרינן אלו מתרמי ליה תלתא מצות יהיב כוליה ביתיה, משמע דאפילו למצוה עוברת כאתרוג וסוכה לא מחויב הוא לתת אפילו שליש ממונו, וזה תימה האיך נתנו דמים למצוה עוברת.

וכתב הראב”ד ז”ל כדי שלא יבוא לידי עוני ויפיל עצמו על הציבור, וכמו שאמרו עשה שבתך חול ואל תצטרך לבריות, וכן אמרו המבזבז אל יבזבז יותר מחומש, שהעוני כמיתה.

ומכל מקום לא כמיתה ממש אמר הרב, שלא אמרו אלא במצות עשה בשב ואל תעשה, אבל במצות לא תעשה אפילו כל ממונו.

Nothing to add.

Awww – Kotzk Seems Alright…

I read this story in the Shavuos edition of Sichat Hashavu’a:

Rabbi Bunem of Zichlin, a non-Chassid, upon drawing near to Kotzk, faltered in his Torah study. The Rebbe summoned him to convey this:

Do you know why we refer to a Torah scholar as “milei kreiso”, having filled his belly, with wisdom? Why not employ the traditional idiom of head or heart? This is because, no matter how many times one has eaten, the hunger returns daily.

A Jew who learns less diligently than before for “Chassidus” can find himself another Rebbe.

Who Mangles Rambam More, Mussar or Brisk?

Rambam Hilchos Talmud Torah 3:7:

שמא תאמר, עד שאקבץ ממון אחזור ואקרא, עד שאקנה מה שאני צריך ואפנה מעסקי, ואחזור ואקרא. אם תעלה מחשבה זו על לבך אין אתה זוכה לכתרה של תורה לעולם. אלא עשה תורתך קבע ומלאכתך עראי, ולא תאמר לכשאפנה אשנה, שמא לא תפנה.

Mashgichim are accustomed to “proving” from the wording that, even if the thought itself temporarily crossed your mind, “you won’t merit the crown of Torah” forevermore!

The true meaning in Mishneh Torah refers to the duration of the idea’s control over you (especially because there is no primary source for anyone to claim otherwise): Negate the niggling notion that you may progress.

Mashgichim do not know how to read Rishonim!