How Many Names Is Jerusalem Given in Tanach?

About seventy, see Medrash Zuta Shir Hashirim 1:1 (same as the Jews and Torah).

But there are no details. So here’s the list from Wikipedia:

  1. אבן מעמסה.
  2. אפרתה.
  3. אריאל.
  4. ארמון.
  5. אשת נעורים.
  6. בית תפלה.
  7. במות.
  8. בעולה.
  9. בשן.
  10. בתולה.
  11. גבעת הלבונה.
  12. גולה.
  13. גיא חזון.
  14. גילה.
  15. גלעד.
  16. גן אלקים.
  17. דלתות העמים.
  18. דרום.
  19. דרושה.
  20. הר גבוה.
  21. הר המור.
  22. הר מועד.
  23. הר הקודש.
  24. הר מרום ישראל.
  25. חדרך.
  26. חפצי בה.
  27. טבור הארץ.
  28. יבוס.
  29. ידידות.
  30. ה’ יראה.
  31. ה’ שמה.
  32. ים.
  33. יער הנגב.
  34. יפה נוף.
  35. ירושלם.
  36. ירכתי צפון.
  37. כלה.
  38. כלילת יופי.
  39. כיסא ה’.
  40. כרמל.
  41. לבנון.
  42. מגדל עדר.
  43. מוראה.
  44. מוריה.
  45. מנוחה.
  46. מצודה.
  47. מקדשים.
  48. מרום.
  49. משוש כל הארץ.
  50. נחלה.
  51. סורה.
  52. עדן.
  53. עיר דוד.
  54. עיר היונה.
  55. עיר הצדק.
  56. עיר ה’.
  57. עיר לא נעזבה.
  58. עיר שחוברה לה יחדו.
  59. עקרה.
  60. ציון.
  61. קריית מלך רב.
  62. רבתי בגויים.
  63. רבתי עם.
  64. רחל.
  65. רמה.
  66. שגל.
  67. שדה יער.
  68. שלם.
  69. שרתי במדינות.
  70. שם חדש אשר פי ה’ יקבנו.

The Real Reason Zehut Hasn’t Joined up with Another Party

An excerpt of Moshe Feiglin’s answer to this question:

Zehut’s goal is not to play the familiar game of the Right, which always leads to more retreats… My goal has remained to create a leadership alternative with a completely different plan of action… The Right is incapable of stating what it wants. All it can say is what it does not want. With that, you cannot go to the public and offer it an alternative.

Allow me to sharpen the answer Feiglin gave as I understand it:

The main problem of semi-libertarians with the ostensible “Right” is their willingness to use Big Government as a means to reach their ends, as opposed to shrinking the state so it cannot be used against anyone.

When You See a Jew Wearing Tallis and Tefillin at 11:30 AM…

Here’s a story from “The Elephant in the Room”, by Rabbi Ron Yitzchak Eisenman p. 147:

For twelve years I had the privilege of being an eighth grade rebbe at a yeshiva day school in Northern New Jersey…

The boys in my class never saw zekeinim, elders. They almost never saw a Brooklyn alter yid (elderly Jew) with a long white beard and pei’os

Therefore, one of the things I did as an eighth grade rebbe was organise a trip to Williamsburg to see some heilege Yidden (holy Jews). We would daven in school and learn a little and then board the bus to Williamsburg, arriving in Brooklyn at about 11 a.m., and I would show the boys the chassidic shuls and batei midrash of the neighborhood.

One year we arrived at one of the main neighborhood shuls at about 11:30 a.m. As we looked around and admired the shul, we saw ten to fifteen men in various parts of the davening. Some were donning their tefillin; others were shuckling and swaying; most of them were praying. I didn’t think much of this, since I knew one could find a minyan for shacharis (morning prayers) in this city until late in the morning.

As we left the shul, Avi, one of the more naïve of the boys, asked me, “Rebbe, are all these men tzaddikim?”

I looked at him and realized he was not being sarcastic at all; he was totally serious. “I don’t know, but why are you asking?”

“Rebbe, you taught us that nowadays only great tzaddikim like the Vilna Gaon wear tallis and tefillin the entire day. So when I saw these men in shul at 11:30 in their tallis and tefillin, I figured that they must be tzaddikim!”

A Jewish boy sees Jewish men who act Jewish and are davening – so they must be tzaddikim. Why else would they be in tallis and tefillin at 11:30 a.m.?

I was very touched by Avi’s sincere naïvetè. His profound sense of belief in the goodness of each and every Yid touched me to the core of my being.

Avi considered those who dress like tzaddikim as tzaddikim. There is something so pristine and beautiful to this worldview.

I often wish I still felt this way.