Fred Reed: Victory and Defeat Are Equally Odious

Send Money

An Inside Look at the Defense Industry

In early 2035, the thirty-fourth year of the war against Al Qaeda,  the Pentagon issued a White Paper saying that the F35 Raptor, the front-line fighter plane of the United States, was nearing the end of its useful life and needed to be replaced. Not everyone agreed. Various budget-cutting organizations argued that the Raptor had never been used and thus no one could tell whether it had a useful life. Anyway, the job of the Air Force, killing third-world peasants and their families, had been co-opted by drones. America didn´t need a new fighter, said the critics.

The Air Force countered that the new plane would look feral and make loud, exciting noises. To this, critics could find no rejoinder. Design studies began.

An early question was what to call the new fighter. By tradition, aircraft were named after aggressive but unintelligent birds (F-15 Eagle, F16 Fighting Falcon), unpleasant animals (AH-1 Cobra, F-18 Hornet) ghosts (F-4 Phantom, AC-130 Spectre) or Stone Age nomads (AH-64 Apache). However, something with more pizzazz was needed to get funding through Congress.

Discussion ensued. Suggestions were solicited from The Building, as the Pentagon calls itself. These ran from “F-40 Screaming Kerblam” to the politically marginal “Horrendous Dyke,” whose author believed that it would depress enemy fliers. Going with zoological tradition, the Air Force wanted to call it the Rabid Bat. A congressional wag weary of military price tags  suggested “Priscilla,” because that no pilot would then go near it and the country would be spared the expense of wars.  (His idea of painting it in floral patterns was not taken seriously.)

A national transgender- advocacy  group favored “Susan B. Anthony,” but this was held to be disrespectful of Ebonics, and in any event Anthony might be Susan. It was hard to tell about these things.

The Air Force prevailed. The Rabid Bat was born.

Squabbling over specifications immediately began. Lockheed-Martin and Boeing Military Aircraft, both expected to bid, wanted a cruising speed of Mach 13, as this was technically impossible and would allow them to do lucrative design work until the entropic death of the solar system. A time-honored principle of governmental contraction is that if you are paid to solve a problem, the last thing you want is to succeed, because you then stop getting paid. This explains the anti-ballistic-missile program, racial policy, and Congress.

The matter of social consciousness arose. Half of the fighter pilots were women, as prescribed by law in 2016. To facilitate gender equity, a bracket in the pilot´s seat was mandated, to hold a telephone book for the flier to sit on so she could see out the windshield.  Since many pilots were single moms, the design included a drop-down changing table in the cockpit.

These gender-friendly measures were championed by Dacowits, who is not a Polish mathematician but the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services. These ladies subscribe to the principle that if a thing weighs more than twenty pounds, it ought be left on the damned truck.

All buttons and switches on the Rabid Bat were to be labeled in English, Spanish, Choctaw, and Tloxyproctyl. This latter was the language of an obscure tribe of seven primitives in the Amazon rain forest. Tloxyproctyl  consisted of seven words, none of which meant anything. The tribe had been discovered when one of its members, named Wunxputl, had fallen into the Atlantic atop a log and washed up on Miami Beach. Thinking that an airliner he saw must be God, he enlisted in the Air Force. The EOST (Ethnic Outreach and Sensitivity Training) program had done the rest.

Secondary considerations were next addressed, such as speed, range, armament, and stealth. Critics again pointed out that none of these mattered, since Afghan weddings and lightly armed peasants could be blown up more cheaply with drones, which in any event were more agile than great honking piloted fighters. In fact, Reytheon was working on wedding-recognition software, which went swimmingly and was only 1700% over budget. A maverick in Congress suggested that the Rabid Bats be lined up on a runway and used as planters for geraniums, but was not taken seriously.

Lockheed-Martin said that the price of the program would only be about $987 billion, a steal. Historically-minded critics predicted that after the program was too far along to be abandoned, Lockheed-Martin would discover that the price would be…heh…rather more. This is a standard part of military contracting, with its own accounting category.

A prototype was duly built. Early flight trials began. It was then discovered by the investigative reporter Nickolas Fervently of the New York Times that due to a design error, the guns of the Rabid Bat pointed backward. A redesign, his sources had told him, would cost about $345 billion.

A flap ensued. It sufficiently threatened the flow of funds that Lockheed´s CEO, E. Johnston Farad, called a press conference. “It is necessary to understand the truly revolutionary nature of this aircraft,” he said, “It is so stealthy that the enemy will not detect the Rabid Bat until it has dropped its bomb load. Consequently, it will only use its guns to fire backward at a pursuing enemy.” Congress was so impressed by this advance that it increased the buy by forty aircraft.

Critics persisted in pointing out that the Rabid Bat was simply unnecessary.  Moslem goat-herders were already being efficiently slaughtered by psychopaths sitting at screens in the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. Lockheed responded that by pure happenstance, parts for the plane were to be manufactured in all fifty states, creating jobs. The plane was thus seen by all fifty governors to be essential to national security.

Reporter Fervently of the NYT looked suspiciously at the massive plant being built in West Virginia to make special tires for the plane. Production would be 431 tires per Rabid Bat per year. He wrote a column suggesting that the Rabid Bat would be the first combat eighteen-wheeler.  He was dismissed as a crank. Surely, said Lockheed, it never hurt to have enough tires.

Conservative senators replied that Fervently obviously hated America and wanted it conquered and enslaved by enemies surrounding the country. Fervently pointed out that the United States was surrounded by Mexico, Canada, and two oceans. Mexico would not conquer America and thus disrupt its biggest drug market, and Canadians needed overflight rights to Cancun in winter. These considerations ensured amity.

The noted military scholar Damian Isby at the Rand Corporation circulated an eyes-only paper saying that the military irrelevance of the Rabid Bat was vital to the health of the defense industry and thus to national security. To the arms makers, he said, victory and defeat were equally odious, as both reduced the purchase of weaponry. A good war was an interminable war. The Rabid Bat, having no military purpose, would not upset the balance with the Taliban, and would thus keep America free.

Serial production began. The Republic was safe.

From Lewrockwell.com, here.

How to Fill Out Form 101 – 101 טופס

Work for an Israeli Employer? Here’s How to Fill Out Your Form 101

Every year, each employee is required to complete a Form 101 for each place of employment and return it to the person in charge of salaries. Although this form should technically be filled out on January 1 (for continuing jobs), on a practical level it is sufficient to complete it before the January salary is processed.

If your employer doesn’t give you one, you can download a blank Form 101 from the tax office here.

Continue reading on Aboulafia Avital Shrensky & Co, here…

Note: The whole site is packed with useful Israeli tax information in English.

שליש במקרא גליון #1

לכבוד הקוראים היקרים

מצוי בזה הגליון הראשון של מגזין “שליש במקרא” היוצא לאור ע”י מערכת “שליש במקרא”.
מערכת “שליש במקרא” שמה לה למטרה לעודד את לימוד התנ”ך בקרב כל בני ישראל, מכל המגזרים. אין לנו שום מגמות פוליטיות וכדו’, וכל מגמתינו לעודד כמה שיותר יהודים לעסוק בלימוד ספרי התנ”ך, וכן לסייע בידי הלומדים כבר, ולהגיש בפניהם חומר מעניין אשר יעזור לכל אחד ואחת להתחבר יותר ללימוד חשוב זה.
בכל הערה הארה ושאלה פנו אלינו.
נקוה שתיהנו,
“מערכת שליש במקרא”.

Download (PDF, 1.29MB)

Reprinted with permission.

הודעת אגודת קדושת ציון:

כל החברים שלום וברכה,

כפי שהודענו בעלון האחרון, בראש חודש שבט הבא עלינו לטובה מתחילה תכנית הלימוד של אגודת “קדושת ציון” ללימוד התנ”ך במשך שנה.

תכנית זו נולדה כתוצאה מהחשיבות העצומה שיש ללימוד המקרא על-מנת להבין את מציאותנו כעם, ולנוכח העזובה הרבה השוררת כיום לדאבוננו בנושא זה בעולם הישיבות.

לשמחתנו, נטל על עצמו יהודי יקר החפץ בעילום שמו להוציא עלון שבועי אשר יהיה צמוד לתכנית שלנו, ואשר יסייע ללמודים בהכרת החומר וברקע הנצרך לידיעת הספרים הנלמדים. לנוכח המחסור הכספי, עלון זה לעת עתה יצא במהדורה ממוחשבת בלבד, ואנו מקוים שיום אחד יורווח ויתאפשר להוציא אותו אף במהדורה “חיה”.

אני מדגיש בזאת, כי אין מדובר בעלון מטעם האגודה שלנו ואיננו אחראים לכתוב בו, אלא זהו עלון עצמאי אשר משתף אתנו פעולה מבחינת תכנית הלימוד, ואנו מברכים אותו על כך ומאחלים לו הצלחה.

מי שמעוניין לקבל את העלון באופן קבוע ייצור קשר עם מערכת “שליש במקרא” בכתובת shlishe24@gmail.com

נ.ב. אף שהתכנית מתחילה רשמית בראש חודש, את לימוד התורה (פרשת השבוע) מומלץ להתחיל כבר מהיום, כי התכנית בנויה באופן שלומדים פרשה במשך שבוע שלם.

אנן לא מסרינן נפשין אקדושת השם

מתוך אתר כיכר השבת:

הגאון רבי יהודה אריה דינר פסק לאחד השואלים כי מותר לו לשבור אייפון פסול של חברו מאחר וכך מצילו מהגיהנום ומצטט את הגמרא הקובעת שמותר לקרוע בגד של אישה שהולכת שלא לפי הדין (חרדים)

הרב דינר משיב כי הוא אף עושה בכך מצווה משום שמציל את חברו מדינה של גיהינום, ובכך מסתמך הגרי”א דינר על פסקיהם של מרנן הגר”נ קרליץ ושר התורה הגר”ח קנייבסקי ועל שו”תים נוספים.

הרב מצטט את הגמרא במסכת ברכות הקובעת שמותר לקרוע בגד של אשה שהולכת שלא לפי הדין, וכותב כי “והא דכתב ה’משך חכמה’ שרחל מתה משום שגנבה התרפים אע”פ שעשתה זאת להפרישו מעבודה זרה יש לומר שהתם הוא לפני מתן תורה אבל לאחר מתן תורה ‘כל ישראל ערבים זה לזה'”.

זה עוד לא אומר שלא תצטרך לשלם על כך בבתי ה”משפט” של המדינה, בדיוק כמו רבי אדא בר אהבה…

“The Only Things We Perceive Are Our Perceptions”

George Berkeley

So all materialistic metaphysics appear circular (or contradictory). Yes, Ayn Rand pointed out perception must have an object, any object, but stated in the tighter way, the problem remains.

By the way, we referenced the above article in our free, special ebook on answering atheists. To receive the full Hebrew ebook, subscribe to Hyehudi’s Daily Newsletter here.