Let Them Censor Us! Ideas Propagate ‘Underground’ Best Anyway…

Censorship “Is The Cause Of Every Revolution In Human History”

Censorship does not do good. We might want to believe it does, and this gets into the fake news problem, for example, that if we just empower Facebook to decide what we can and can’t see and what is good and bad, the problem can be solved. But this is a mistake for a number of reasons.

One, it creates a slippery slope where now we have private corporations deciding what can and cannot be said. But further, let’s say there are clear cases, we’re talking about things like Jihadist propaganda, we’re talking about fascist communities that are promoting ideas that are actively harmful, out in the public. The problem is, if you censor them, you don’t actually remove them. You don’t stop the idea from being spread. You just force them underground. It is underground where these ideas actually propagate best and most effectively. This idea that we can just stamp out ideas, we know does not work. This is the cause of every revolution in human history.

President Kennedy agreed:

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

Indeed, the American government is doing what King George did before the American Revolution … trying to crush dissent.

Reprinted from Washington’s Blog.

From LRC, here.

Do Anti-Zionist Holocaust Survivors Display Principled Courage?

An Ami Magazine article once claimed, as Rabbi Adlerstein summarizes:

Survivors of the Holocaust would naturally take great comfort in seeing the creation of the State as a Divine Hand reaching down to comfort the bedraggled remnant of the Jewish people. It took principled courage, claims the author, to resist what he calls “the comforting interpretation of Jewish history.” Survivors refused the convenience of such an interpretation of the events around them out of fealty to their religious convictions, which had no room for a secular state replacing the yearnings of the Jewish soul.

Now, I didn’t see the Ami piece within, but I wish to make a comment:

There is another option.

Perhaps ungrateful anti-Zionism is a form of Avoda Zara, and rejecting God for idols is not “principled courage”. Recognizing God’s Hand is not only “comforting”. It is no less a form of heavy obligation, both generally, and in terms of promoting messianic “Ad Shetechpatz” concerns further. Not to mention what renewed Jewish sovereignty in Israel implies regarding one own’s and one’s ancestors’ very poor religious and survival choices.

And everyone both is and were all-too-aware of this “Dark Side”.

Indeed, the claim feels anachronistic. Nothing I’ve seen about survivors’ thought processes as set forth in Holocaust Lit hints at anything like this. On the contrary, most of the generation were of the antediluvian religious level. That is, not great. Going to America, as opposed to Israel, had more to do with apathy and familial\material concerns, for example.

This could be demonstrated at great length, sure, but anyone can do it, so why me?