Year: 2019

HOW Many Jews Must Die to Keep Up the Illusion of Israel Being a Weak State?!

Shmuel Sackett of Zehut makes part of the case against accepting American “aid” for Israel:

… The financial aid comes to 1% of Israel’s GDP. That is correct… just 1%, so we can definitely live without it. On the other hand, the damage that it causes is beyond words. Israel has paid dearly for that aid and many Jewish lives have been lost as a result. Prime Minister Golda Meir hesitated to attack first in 1973 because Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger emphatically told her that if she did, America would stop shipping weapons. The result was tragic and, in the end, Kissinger and President Richard Nixon sent in weapons to save Israel from disaster… but it was they who caused that disaster in the first place!

Fast forward to the war in Gaza just 5 years ago when Israel was forced to shoot thousands of missiles into empty fields and literally ran out of the Hellfire missile – provided by America. When we asked them to immediately ship us more, then-President Obama flatly refused and many IDF soldiers lost their lives due to the IAF (Israel Air Force) not having these missiles for their helicopters. Had Israel manufactured these missiles and not relied on America to supply them, many Jewish lives would have been saved.

This financial support also costs Israel a tremendous amount of money as well. I can give 20 examples but allow me to give just one. Poland is threatened by Russia on a daily basis. They are in desperate need of a missile defense system that can defend their country against ballistic missiles which are shot from several hundred miles away, well in the range of Putin’s gangs. Israel had been supplying Poland with high-quality anti-tank missiles so they decided to place a $7 Billion order with Israel to buy a very sophisticated system for ballistic, surface-to-surface missiles as well.

Believe it or not, part of the deal that Israel signed, when it received the American aid, was that it cannot export missile systems of this type without American approval! You read that correctly; America has to approve the sale of an anti-missile system between Israel and Poland. Had Poland been an enemy country with America, I would understand, but Poland has been a member of NATO for over 20 years and is a US ally… So why care if Israel is selling Poland a system to defend itself against Russia?

What happened? America rejected the deal and Israel lost the $7 Billion sale. So, what did Poland do? They really needed this defense system. No problem… the USA defense company, Raytheon, stepped in and made the sale! But don’t worry. Raytheon was very nice and decided to let Israel get involved in 10% of the deal. This meant that instead of getting $7 Billion, they got $700 Million… still a lot of money but nothing close to what could have – and should have – been. That is just one example of the handcuffs placed on Israel because of the financial aid package.

Much more can be said about both these topics but let me simply conclude by saying that while I am not a member of the Rashida Harbi Tlaib fan club, her twisted logic has actually scored two points in my book, without her even noticing!

Read the rest here on Zehut International.

Our Angelically ‘Perfect’ Ancestors Didn’t Even Teach Women BERACHOS!

So, stop being so scared to study Torah seriously with an eye to deriving independent halachic conclusions.

Ben Ish Chai (Year One, Parshas Chukas 11):

נשים חייבות בברכת המזון. והן בעוון עתה רבות בנות אוכלות בלא ברכה מחמת חסרון ידיעה, ועתידות הן ואביהן ובעליהן ליתן את הדין. וראוי לכל אדם ללמד את בתו בנעוריה בית אביה, נוסח ברכת הנהנין וברכת המזון, לפחות נוסח הקצר הכתוב בספרים, ואם לא למדה בבית אביה – חייב בעלה ללמדה, וכנזכר כל זה בחסד לאלפים.

(No need to mention how and when Beis Yaakov came to be…)

They Were Created to Serve Me, While I Was Created to Serve My Maker

Goyim do not exist for their own sake, contra Goyim and universalistic rabbis. They exist to serve us Jews (or sincerely convert to Judaism). But Jews don’t exist for their own sake, either, contra Jewish auto-idolaters. Jews exist solely in order to keep mitzvos.

So, Goyim need Jews to be “saved”, and not the other way around. OK, neither side is doing that so well, but one day we both will.

Yeshayahu 49:23 (Rabbi Touger’s translation):

והיו מלכים אמניך ושרותיהם מיניקתיך אפיים ארץ ישתחוו לך ועפר רגליך ילחכו…

And kings shall be your nursing fathers and their princesses your wet nurses; they shall prostrate themselves to you with their face on the ground, and they shall lick the dust of your feet…

A similar idea was derived in Berachos 6b:

מאי כי זה כל האדם אמר רבי אלעזר אמר הקדוש ברוך הוא כל העולם כלו לא נברא אלא בשביל זה רבי אבא בר כהנא אמר שקול זה כנגד כל העולם כולו רבי שמעון בן עזאי אומר ואמרי לה רבי שמעון בן זומא אומר כל העולם כולו לא נברא אלא לצוות לזה.

Shemos Rabbah 48:1 does not refer to Goyim, but it’s the same general idea:

שאו מרום עיניכם וראו מי ברא אלה בזכות מי נבראו אלה תולדות השמים והארץ ובזכות מי הם עומדים בזכות אלה שמות בני ישראל ואלה בזכות מי הם עומדים בזכות אלה העדות והחקים והמשפטים.

Yeshayahu 56:7 (with Rabbi Touger’s translation) is cheerfully quoted out of context:

 והביאותים אל הר קדשי ושמחתים בבית תפלתי עולתיהם וזבחיהם לרצון על מזבחי כי ביתי בית תפלה יקרא לכל העמים.

I will bring them to My holy mount, and I will cause them to rejoice in My house of prayer; their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be acceptable upon My altar, for My house shall be called a house of prayer for all peoples.

How lovey-dovey! But…

Rashi ad locum was censored (and remains partially so on several Torah databases!).

Well, here is what Rashi used to say:

לכל העמים, ולא לישראל לבדם כי אף לגרים.

“For all peoples: Not only for Israel but also for the proselytes.”

Indeed, our mini-Parsha ends at 56:9:

כל חיתו שדי אתיו לאכל כל חיתו ביער.

To which the uncensored Rashi again explains:

כל חיתו שדי, כל גרי העכו”ם, אתיו והתקרבו אלי, ותאכלו את כל חיתו ביער, את גבורי העכו”ם שאמצו את לבם מלהתגייר.

“All the beasts of the field: All the proselytes of the [nations] come and draw near to Me, and you shall devour all the beasts in the forest, the mighty of the [nations] who hardened their heart and refrained from converting.”

My condolences to anyone upset by all this.

Yes, It’s Just a Story, but They Don’t Tell This Story ABOUT YOU, Right?

A Jew once visited a famous rabbi [this story is told of various rabbis; pick one].

Petitioner: Please give me a Beracha for Parnassah (livelihood).

Rabbi: “Is that what you need a Beracha for?”

Petitioner: Yes.

Rabbi: “You mean you don’t have money?”

Petitioner: Correct.

“Wait”, said the rabbi. “If you don’t have money, how did you manage to get past the gatekeepers?!”

Ron Paul Schools American Conservatives

Conservatives Against Liberty

By 

Ron Paul Institute

July 16, 2019

Recently several prominent social and populist conservatives have attacked libertarianism. These conservatives, some of whom are allies in the fight against our hyper-interventionist foreign policy, blame libertarianism for a variety of social and economic ills. The conservative attack on libertarianism — like the attack on the freedom philosophy launched by leftists — is rooted in factual, economic, and philosophical errors.

Libertarianism’s right-wing critics claim libertarianism is the dominant ideology of the Republican establishment. This is an odd claim since the Republican leadership embraces anti-libertarian policies like endless wars, restrictions on civil liberties, government interference in our personal lives, and massive spending increases on welfare as well as warfare.

Anti-libertarian conservatives confuse libertarianism with the authoritarian “neoliberalism” embraced by both major parties. This confusion may be why these conservatives blame libertarians for the American middle class’s eroding standard of living. Conservatives are correct to be concerned about the economic challenges facing the average American, but they are mistaken to place the blame on the free market.

The American people are not suffering from an excess of free markets. They suffer from an excess of taxes, regulations, and, especially, fiat money. Therefore, populist conservatives should join libertarians in seeking to eliminate federal regulations, repeal the 16th Amendment, and restore a free-market monetary system.

Instead of fighting to end the welfare-regulatory system that benefits economic and political elites at the expense of average Americans, populist conservatives are promoting increased economic interventionism. For example, many populist conservatives support increased infrastructure spending and tariffs and other forms of protectionism.

Like all forms of central planning, these schemes prevent goods and services from being used for the purposes most valued by consumers. This distorts the marketplace and lowers living standards — including of people whose jobs are temporally saved or created by these government interventions. Those workers would be better off in the long term finding new jobs in a free market.

Anti-free-market conservatives ignore how their policies harm those they claim to care about. For example, protectionism harms farmers and others working in businesses depending on international trade.

The most common complaint of social conservatives is that libertarianism promotes immorality. These conservatives confuse a libertarian’s opposition to outlawing drugs, for example, with moral approval of drug use. Many libertarians condemn drug use and other destructive behaviors. However, libertarians reject the use of government force to prevent individuals from choosing to engage in these behaviors. Instead, libertarians support the right of individuals to use peaceful means to persuade others not to engage in destructive or immoral behaviors.

Libertarians also support the right of individuals not to associate with, or to subsidize in any way, those whose lifestyles or beliefs they find objectionable. Social conservatives object to libertarians because social conservatives wish to use government power to force people to be good. This is the worst type of statism because it seeks to control our minds and souls.

Most people accept the idea that it is wrong to initiate force against those engaging in peaceful behaviors. Libertarians apply this nonaggression principle to government. Making government follow the nonaggression principle would end unjust wars, income and inflation taxes, and the destruction caused by the use of force to control what we do with our property, how we raise our children, who we associate with, and what we put into our bodies. Making governments abide by the nonaggression principle is the only way to restore a society that is free, prosperous, and moral.

From Lewrockwell.com, here.