Non-Governmental Zoning Restrictions

Zoning: Do We Need It?

Jun 15, 2017

Without zoning, we’re told, the layout of neighborhoods and cities would be hideous and irrational, and residents would be unhappy. Is this so? And would zoning exist in a free society? Subscribe to the Tom Woods Show: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/t…
http://www.TomWoods.com/932
http://www.SupportingListeners.com
http://www.RonPaulHomeschool.com
http://www.FreeHistoryCourse.com
http://www.TomsFreeBooks.com

From YouTube, here.

Gold Bug

Shavuos: Where’s the Gold?

King David famously said that the Torah is even better than gold. In one passage, he writes, “The Torah of Your mouth is better for me than thousands of gold (zahav) and silver” (Ps. 119:72). Later in that chapter, he exclaims, “I loved Your commandments more than zahav and paz” (Ps. 119:127).  In yet another passage, King David writes, “They [the Torah’s Laws] are more desirable than gold and much paz” (Ps. 19:11). In these few passages, we have so far encountered two words for “gold” — zahav and paz. In addition to these two words, we will find another three words in the Bible that refer to “gold”: ketem, charutz, and betzer. This essay will explore these five different words for “gold” and discuss whether or not they are truly synonymous. Various commentators will suggest that these different words connote different places in which gold is found and/or different hues of gold.

The most common Hebrew word in the Bible for “gold” is zahav. Along with its Aramaic counterpart dahav — which is explained by the Hebrew ZAYIN morphing into an Aramaic DALET — this word appear more than four-hundred times throughout the Bible. The Talmud (Yoma 44b–45a) states that there are seven types (or grades) of zahav: regular zahav, zahav tov (“good gold”), zahav Ophir (gold imported from Ophir, I Chron. 29:4), zahav mufaz (explained below), zahav shachut (“beaten gold,” I Kgs. 10:16–17 and II Chron. 9:15–16), zahav sagur (“fine gold,” this term appears eight times in I Kgs. 6–7, II Chron. 4 and 9)and zahar parvaim (“gold from a Parvaim” or “gold whose color resembles cow blood,” II Chron. 3:6). A similar tradition about seven shades of gold in King David’s blonde hair can be found in Tikkunei Zohar (Tikkun #70). [For an alternate list of the seven golds that replaces regular zahav and zahav Ophir with zahav tahor (“pure gold”) and zahav mezukak (“refined gold”), see Shemot Rabbah §35:1.]

Rabbi Aharon Marcus (1843–1916) explains that the root of the word zahav is ZAYIN-HEY (or perhaps even just the letter ZAYIN alone) which means “this,” because something shiny and sparkling like “gold” calls attention to itself. Rabbi Shlomo Pappenheim (1740–1814) similarly explains that zahav is derived from the biliteral root ZAYIN-BET which means “flow,” because when one refines gold, the unalloyed gold simply “flows” away from its impurities. [Interestingly, though zahav literally means “gold,” Ibn Janach and Radak write that the word zahav can be borrowed to refer to anything pristine and clean (see, for example, Jer. 51:7 and Zech. 4:12).]

A popular etymology of the word zahav argues that it is a contraction of the phrase zeh hav (“give this”)—an allusion to gold’s role as legal tender. This explanation is cited by such luminaries as Peirush HaRokeach, Rabbi Todros Abulafia (1247–1306), Rabbi Binyamin HaRofeh Anav (a brother of the author of Shibbolei HaLeket)the Maharal of Prague (1520–1609), Rabbi Eliezer Papo (1785–1828), and more.

The Torah describes the Pishon River as circumscribing the Land of Havilah, reporting that the especially good gold is found there (Gen. 2:11–12). In explaining those passages, Nachmanides explains that this “good gold” in found in the sand and on the shores along the Pishon River. Based on this, Rabbi Shlomo Aharon Wertheimer (1866–1935) writes that the word zahav is related to the word zav (“flow”), and denotes the type of gold found near “flowing” bodies of water.

Havilah is probably named after a person named Havilah son of Joktan (son of Eber), who was a brother to someone named Ophir (Gen. 10:29, I Chron. 1:23). The name Ophir also appears as a place name for the location from which both zahav (I Chron. 29:4, I Kgs. 9:28; 10:11; 22:49, and II Chron. 9:10) and ketem (Isa. 13:12, Ps. 45:10, Job 28:16) are brought. Rabbi Pinchas Eliyahu Horowitz (1765–1821) writes in his Sefer HaBrit that Ophir refers to the South American country Peru, where large deposits of gold are supposedly concentrated in the Andes Mountains and in the many rivers that flow across its jungles. Others identify Ophir as someplace on the Indian subcontinent, with the legendary lost city of Atlantis, with the Phillipines, and even with Australia. Nonetheless, the accepted understanding amongst scholars is that Ophir is somewhere in the Arabian Peninsula or in the Horn of Africa (i.e. Ethiopia). Rabbi Yosef Chaim of Baghdad (1832–1909) identifies zahav Ophir as “white gold” (perhaps platinum, or an alloy of gold and some other white metal) which he claims is found in Russia. The American archeologist William Foxwell Albright (1891–1971) identifies Ophir with Punt in Somalia.

The word paz appears nine times in the Bible. Although most commentators understand paz to mean “gold” (as Radak to Ps. 19:11 writes, it specifically means “good and unadulterated gold”), others disagree: Ibn Ezra (to Ps. 19:11 and Song of Songs 5:11) explains paz as a “precious stone,” while Rabbi Moshe David Valle (1697–1777) explains that paz refers to “royal jewels” that happened to be made out of gold. As Rabbi Wertheimer puts it, paz is the best type of gold in the world and is the most rare form of gold.

Rabbi Pappenheim explains that the two-letter root PEH-ZAYIN — from which paz is derived — refers to “fast movement.” Thus, when the Bible describes King David as being mifazez before the Holy Ark (II Sam. 6:16), this refers to him furiously dancing in honor of the Torah. Based on this understanding of the root, Rabbi Pappenheim explains that the word paz refers to extra pure gold which shimmers in the sunlight as though it were dancing. He also explains that the adjectives mufaz (I Kgs. 10:18), me’ufaz (Jer. 10:9), and ufaz (Dan. 10:5) all refer to shiny gold that has a glistening and glowing glimmer. [Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch (to Gen. 49:23–24) notes that there ought to be a connection between mifazez and paz, but confesses that he does not know what it is. See also Rabbi Hirsch’s comments to Ps. 19:11.]

Others (like Ibn Janach and Radak) explain that the triliteral root PEH-ZAYIN-ZAYIN is separate from the word paz, and refers to “strength.” They explain mifazez as referring to the “strength” and “vigor” with which King David danced before the Ark. These commentators explain that when used to describe gold, mufaz and ufaz refer to gold that is especially unalloyed and thus “stronger” than other, adulterated types of gold. Radak explains that me’ufaz means “from [a place called] Uzaf,” which is identified by Targum (there) as Ophir (possibly because the ZAYIN of Ufaz is interchangeable with the REISH of Ophir).

The word ketem appears nine times in the Bible. Although Ibn Janach first defines ketem as “jewels,” he concludes that it more likely means “gold” — which is how most commentators explain the word. Like zahav, ketem is also said to be imported from Ophir (see above), and according to Dr. Chaim Tawil the very word ketem is said to be derived from the Akkadian word kutimmu and the Sumerian word kudim which mean “goldsmith.” [Interestingly, Rabbi Moshe Ibn Ezra (1055–1138) writes that the word ketem in Job 31:24 actually means “silver,” even though he agrees that elsewhere it is a synonym for “gold.”]

Alternatively, ketem is derived from the Hebrew root KAF-TAV-MEM, which also means “stain” or “dirtied” (for example, see Jer. 2:22). Rabbi Pappenheim writes that both meanings of ketem are actually derived from the monoliteral root KAF which refers to “hitting.” He explains that KAF-TAV specifically refers to “beating something through repeated rubbing,” such that ketem refers to especially pure gold whose malleability allows it to beaten into something very thin. Since such fine gold is especially eye-catching, the term ketem was borrowed to mean anything which noticeably sticks out, such as a “stain” or “dirt” on an otherwise pristine background.

The Modern Hebrew word katom (for the color “orange”) is derived from the same root as ketem, and the Modern Hebrew word tapuz (for the fruit “orange”) is a contraction of the Hebrew phrase tapuach zahav (literally, “Golden Apple”) — an expression found in Prov. 25:11. The English word orange, by the way, is related to the word Hebrew/Aramaic etrog/trunga, as both are derived from the Old Persian word narang and refer to various citrus fruit. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the initial o- in the English form of this word is probably influenced by the place name Orange, famous for the House of Orange.

The word charutz in the sense of “gold” appears six times in the Bible. This word is actually the standard Phoenician (Tyrian) and Akkadian word for “gold,” so some scholars claim that Hebrew borrowed the word from those languages. On the other hand, Rabbi Marcus explains that since the root CHET-REISH-TZADI refers to “cutting / digging with a sharp instrument,” gold is called charutz because it is dug up from underground. Indeed, Rabbi Wertheimer writes that the word charutz refers to gold found by “digging.” Rabbi Yishaya of Trani (1180–1250) explains that gold is called charutz because the pursuit of gold makes people “diligent” and “industrious,” which are alternate meanings of the Hebrew word charutz.

Psalms 68:14 refers to something called yerakrak charutz (“greenish charutz”), which Menachem Ibn Saruk explains is a type of gemstone. However, Dunash Ibn Labrat and others explain that charutz refers to “gold” (see also Tosafos to Nedarim 32a) such that this term references greenish gold (perhaps a reference to electrum or gold alloyed with cadmium). Indeed, Radak also defines charutz as “gold,” while noting that some say that charutz refers to gemstones.

The Israeli archaeologist Dr. Shmuel Yeivin (1896–1982) wrote (under the pen name Shebna) that the words in question reflect different colors of gold (usually depending on what other metals are present in the alloy). In fact, the Mishnah (Yoma 4:4) teaches that on normal days, the firepan used for the incense in the Holy Temple would be made of greenish gold, but on Yom Kippur, they would use one made of reddish gold. Yeivin thus explains that zahav is yellowish gold, ketem is reddish gold, and charutz is greenish gold. That ketem refers to something reddish is hinted to in the Mishnah (Niddah 8:1) which uses the word ketem as a “blood stain.” Indeed, gold alloyed with copper — known as “Red Gold” or “Rose Gold” — boasts a reddish color. Additionally, Yeivin argues that the word paz focuses on the shine/luster of gold, without regard to its particular hue.

The last word in our discussion is betezer. The debate concerning this word centers on a specific verse in which Eliphaz the Temanite tells Job that man’s best hope is to repent “and then you would have a betezer on the ground and Ophir [i.e. gold] with the rocks of the brooks” (Job 22:24, see also Job 22:25; 36:19). Ibn Janach, Radak, and Gersonides explain that the word betezr in this context refers to “gold.” However, other commentators disagree with this assessment and explain the word differently: Ibn Ezra (there) writes that betzer is “silver,” while Rashi (following Menachem) writes that it is a “stronghold.” Rabbi Isaiah of Trani explains that betezer does not actually mean “gold,” but is still related to gold because it refers to the crude ore which, when refined, can yield gold.

Gut Yuntiff,

Reuven Chaim Klein

Beitar Illit, Israel

P.S. I published an article in the May 2020 issue of Babel Magazine (for language enthusiasts and scholars) about our work with synonyms in What’s in a Word? You can access the article here if you are interested.

Rabbi Reuven Chaim Klein is the author of the newly-released work God versus Gods: Judaism in the Age of Idolatry (Mosaica Press, 2018). His book follows the narrative of Tanakh and focuses on the stories concerning Avodah Zarah using both traditional and academic sources. It also includes an encyclopedia of all the different types of idolatry mentioned in the Bible.

Rabbi Klein studied for over a decade at the premier institutes of the Hareidi world, including Beth Medrash Govoha in Lakewood and Yeshivas Mir in Jerusalem. He authored many articles both in English and Hebrew, and his first book Lashon HaKodesh: History, Holiness, & Hebrew (Mosaica Press, 2014)  became an instant classic. His weekly articles on synonyms in the Hebrew language are published in the Jewish Press and Ohrnet. Rabbi Klein lives with his family in Beitar Illit, Israel and can be reached via email to: rabbircklein@gmail.com

Reprinted with permission from Ohr Somayach here.

‘Yeridas Hadoros’ Is Only In General

מתוך שו”ת תולדות יעקב לרב יעקב זאב בן אברהם כהנא סי’ ל”ג:

ומ”ש וכי אכשור דרי כבר כתבתי דבדבר פרטי יוכל להיות דאכשיר דרי. וע’ גיטין פ”ה ע”א רש”י קדושין ל”ז א’ ד”ה ונוהגין בין בארץ כו’ תפלין אשכחינהו באמוראי כו’ משמע בהדי’ דלא כ”ע אנחי תפלין. ובזמן הסמ”ג לא הי’ בר נש דלא הי’ מניח תפלין. אע”כ דבדבר הנוגע לענין פרטי אמרינן אכשיר דרי. וכן לענין טבילה לתפילה דאמרינן בברכות כ”ב א’ דבטלוה וע’ תוס’ שם ע”ב ד”ה ולית הלכתא כוותי’ והיום אנו מחזיקין מאד בטבילה והמנהג של הטבילה נתפשט’ בכ”מ אלא ע”כ כנ”ל.

We have brought other examples in the past.

הגרד”ל בענין מזיק לגוי

מתוך שיעור הגאון רבי דוב לנדו שליט”א מחוה”מ פסח תש”פ “בענין השבתה בחמץ שחייב באחריותו”:

א) במ”ב סי’ ת”מ סק”ד כתב ב’ דרכים בענין חמץ של עכו”ם הנמצא באחריות של ישראל לסוברים דלא מהני ביה ביטול, ותרווייהו אינם לפי כל הפוסקים [ואחת מהן, דהיינו למכור הבית לגוי לא שייך בארץ ישראל, דאסור למכור קרקע לגוי].

ובאחרונים יש נידון אי שרי לשרוף החמץ מחמת איסור מזיק [וגם עיקר איסור מזיק אי איכא בממון עכו”ם יש נידון ותליא בסיבת האיסור דמזיק באופן כללי, אם האיסור משום לא תגזול כמו שאומר רבינו יונה בריש אבות או הטעם משום לפני עוור כמו שאומר הרמ”ה בב”ב כ”ו א’ או שלומדים בק”ו ממצות השבת אבידה ומצות ואהבת לרעך כמוך, ועי’ מנחת חינוך (קומץ המנחה מצוה י”א).

ולענין מזיק בגוי יעוי’ רש”י גיטין דף כ”א ע”ב דמשמע דחבלתו דגוי מותרת וא”כ לכאורה ק”ו היזיקו, ועי’ ע”ז דף י”ג ע”ב עבד עכו”ם מאי, א”ל מאי קא מיבעיא ליה תניא העכו”ם וכו’ לא מעלין ולא מורידין ופרש”י דאסור להמיתו בידים, ואף דע”י עיקור אינו מת וחבלה שרי להנ”ל, אולי חיישינן שמא ימות עי”ז, וע”ש לקמן דף מ”ג ע”א דמצא עכו”ם אחד וסטרו כדי שיבטל את הע”ז, וצע”ש. ומשמע שאין איסור להזיק גוי. ועי’ לענין איסור מזיק בשל עכו”ם בההוא דתענית (דף ז’ ע”ש) במעשה דריב”ח וברתי’ דקיסר שהזיק בגרמא ע”י העצה את הממון של הקיסר ודו”ק, (ומיהו קשה ללמוד מדברי אגדה), וצ”ע בכל זה].

ועי’ חזו”א או”ח סי’ קי”ח סק”ה (ד”ה כ’) דכתב שם דשרי לשרוף החמץ של נכרי אם א”א להחזיר, וטעמא כתב שם דממון נכרי מופקר לישראל בזמן שהוא נכשל בהן לעבור עבירה עכ”ל, [ויע”ש שכ’ דחייב לשלם לנכרי, ועי’ חזו”א ב”ק סי’ י’ סקי”ד שהוכיח מדברי הרא”ש דצריך לשלם, ועי’ מנ”ח (מצוה נ”ז קרוב לתחילתו) דכתב שם דמזיק עכו”ם פטור, וע”ש מה דמייתי מאחרונים לענין פשיעה מטעם מזיק בנכסי עכו”ם]. ובסי’ קכ”ד (לדף כ”ט ע”ב ד”ה מג”א) כתב החזו”א דפקדון של נכרי ביד ישראל אפשר דאפי’ לר”י א”צ לשורפו, יוע”ש. [וצ”ע בספר מקור חיים סי’ ת”מ סק”א לענין מצוה, ויל”ע במש”כ בפתיחה לסי’ תל”א (ד”ה היוצא) דיש חיוב ביעור בחמץ בפסח על כל העולם מדין איסורי הנאה, ומייתי עלה ההיא דב”ק (דף צ”ח ע”ב) דהכל מצווין לבערו וצ”ב, ומיהו זה אינו ענין לנידון דידן. ועי’ בחיוב (מה”ת) ביעור חמץ דקטנים, וצ”ע במש”כ במ”ב סי’ תמ”ג ס”ק י”ד ובשעה”צ שם סק”כ ול”ע כעת] .

ובעיקר הסברא שכתב בחזו”א בסי’ קי”ח הנ”ל דממון נכרי מופקר לישראל בזמן שהוא נכשל בהן לעבור עבירה, יל”ע בחיוב מצוות בכה”ג כגון שוחט חי’ ועוף של נכרי אי שרי לכסות דמם משום מצות כסוי הדם אף שמפסיד הדם לנכרי, ועי’ במש”כ בחזו”א יו”ד סי’ רי”ד ) לדף קל”ט ע”ב ד”ה שחטה) לענין היתר הפסד להקדש ע”י כיסוי דם שהקדישו אחר שחיטה, דכתב שם דא”א להקדש לזכות ולעכב מלעשות מצותו ומטעם דכבר נתחייב במצות כסוי, ומיהו הקדש שאני], ואת”ל דבשחט חי’ ועוף של גוי אסור לכסות דמו משום הפסד הגוי מ”מ כששחט ואח”כ הקנה הדם לגוי שרי וחייב לכסות וכמו בהקדש, ועי’ בכל זה בשחט חי’ ועוף של חרש שוטה וקטן, אם רשאי לכסות את הדם שנמצא מפסיד להם את הדם, ולא שמענו כה”ג שאינו מכסה] .

והנה המ”ב דלא נחית להנ”ל לדון בענין שריפת החמץ של גוי, דן כנראה באופן דלא יבוא לידי הפסד ועי’.

KIDDUSH HASHEM: New, Enlarged Beis Din Rules Eliezer Berland *yemach shemo* Be Ostracized

Three Chareidi Batei Dinim Rule that Eliezer Berland is Guilty and Should be Ostracized

(By Rabbi Yair Hoffman for 5TJT.com)

The Talmud Yerushalmi in Kiddushin 4:1 states that a Kiddush Hashem is greater than a Chillul Hashem. It is clear, however, that the simple meaning of this expression is too obvious a statement to be an insight of the Talmud Yerushalmi.

Rather, the meaning of this passage reflects the idea that when both a Chillul Hashem and a Kiddush hashem are present in the same action, the Kiddush Hashem outweighs the Chillul hashem.

A few hours ago, in Eretz Yisroel three separate Chareidi Batei Dinim, after 18 months of (two of them) meticulously collecting evidence and testimony, issued a devastating ruling and declaration against Eliezer Berland. One such Beis Din was Zichron Meir Tzedek (Rav Shmuel Vosner’s Beis Din) which included Rabbi Shriel Rosenberg. Rabbi Shmuel Eliezer Stern, and Rabbi Yehuda Fisher, from the Eida HaChareidis Beis Din in Yerushalayim.

The Batei Dinim described the content of the testimonies that they had heard as “untoward acts” and “very serious behaviors.” They concluded that according to the opinion of our holy Torah everyone must stay away from

After describing the content of the testimonies in plain language as “acts that are not done and most serious acts”, the judges state: “It is clear that according to the opinion of our holy teachings, anyone who violates the three cardinal sins and their derivatives, someone who values his soul must stay away from him and one is obligated to act in this way.”

The second Beis Din was Rabbi Yitzchak Tuvia Weiss, the head of the Eida Chareidis, Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch, and Rabbi Chaim Meir Halevi Vozner. The third Beis Din that signed onto the conclusions of the other two were Rabbi Shevach Tzvi Rosenblatt, Rabbi Yehuda Silman, and Rabbi Menachem Mendel Lubin.

They further accused Berland’s followers of heresy for claiming in public and in writing that the crimes and sins he committed were permitted.

In the past, Rav Chaim Kanievsky advised people that Berland was a rasha. Berland has also told cancer patients not to proceed with medical treatment and that if they donate vast amounts of money to him and take certain pills (later found to be Mentos) they will be cured.

 

Translation of ruling:

Special Beis Din

Authorized by the Central Batei Dinim in Our Holy Land

BS”D Wednesday, 26 Iyar 5780

Psak Din

At the request of many, a special Beis Din was convened to investigate the rumors that have come out against the leader of the Shuvu Bonim community. In its proceedings explicit testimony was collected and proofs to actions that must never be done, some of them of the most serious nature. It is clear that according to our holy Torah a person who does not observe matters of the three cardinal sins and their derivatives – someone who is concerned about his soul must stay away from him and we are obligated to observe this.

The matter is very serious since some of his students and followers have Heaven forbid rationalized that it is permitted for a Tzaddik to perform any matter of sin, and this has even been publicized in published works. These matters are to be considered complete heresy in the fundamentals of our religion. We must uproot and remove this apikorsus from within us.

Doing so will fulfill the verse (Shmos 18:23), “and all this people also shall go to their place in peace.”

Rabbi Shriel Rosenberg. Rabbi Shmuel Eliezer Stern, Rabbi Yehuda Fisher, Rabbi Yitzchak Tuvia Weiss, the head of the Eida Chareidis, Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch, and Rabbi Chaim Meir Halevi Vozner, Rabbi Shevach Tzvi Rosenblatt, Rabbi Yehuda Silman, and Rabbi Menachem Mendel Lubin.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

From Yeshiva World News, here.