Year: 2021

עצומה: מוטב ‘ועדת הרבנים לעניני תקשורת’ על פני משרד התקשורת

(כן נראה לע”ד.)

ביקשו ממני לפרסם:

נא למלא תאריך מדויק, שם הפרטי, מ”ז, ומספרי ומספרי טלפון נייד

יש לצרף בעותק מוסתר את המייל של מטה המאבק: telunot123@gmail.com

Yoazh@moc.gov.il

MANCALMOC@MOC.GOV.IL

Pnyot-moc@moc.gov.il

Pnyot@moc.gov.il

shmilam@moc.gov.il

sar@moc.gov.il

yhendel@knesset.gov.il

AsafA@moc.gov.il

EitanC@moc.gov.il

mancalmoc@moc.gov.il

mancalmoc@moc.gov.il

mendelsonb@moc.gov.il

neufeldd@moc.gov.il

neufeldd@moc.gov.il

requests@moc.gov.il

steinera@moc.gov.il

בס”ד

…./12/21

לכבוד שר התקשורת

מר יועז הנדל

כנמנה על משתמשי הפלאפון הכשר, הנני דורש בזאת שלא לפגוע בזכויותי הממוניות עפ”י דין, ומבקש:

 לא לשנות דבר במכשיר הכשר שלי. בכלל זאת, לא לפגוע במספר המותגי של הקומה הכשרה ע”י אפשרות ניוד וכדומה, ולא להכניס אף שינוי בחסימה של המכשיר הכשר, לרבות בחסימה של הסים הכשר ובחסימת קווי התוכן בקומה הכשירה.

רכשתי את המכשיר והסים הכשר על סמך כל מרכיבי החסימות הקיימות בו, וכל שינוי בזה מהווה פגיעה חמורה בי ובזכויותי.

אני רואה בשינוי משום גניבת רכושי הפרטי, ועבירה על חוק התקשורת משנת תשמ”ב שעיגן את הזכות הקניינית שלי בסעיף 51 “נמסרה בקשה כאמור לבעל רישיון, רשאים המנוי או קבוצת המנויים, לקבוע בהסכם ההתקשרות ביניהם, כי לא יהיה ניתן להסיר את ההגבלה או החסימה או לקבוע את התנאים להסרת ההגבלה או החסימה כאמור באותן פסקאות”. [ובקשר לסמכות שניתנה לשר בסעיף 4, כבר נקבע בפיסקה מפורשות – כי סמכות השר בכגון דא, היא לא בדברים שהחוק התיר מפורש, ואין סמכות לשר לחרוג מהחוק המפורש ולפגוע בזכיות הקניניות של הצרכנים].

באתי על החתום

.. ….

מ”ז: .. ….

מספרי הטלפון הכשר שבבעלותי: 05…

05

05

Rabbi Avi Grossman Weighs In on Some Recent Articles

Posted two weeks late, so I added some links…

Reading that article from RYYJ, wherein the author points out that the creation of the State of Israel did not achieve the Zionist goal of a state that could protect the Jewish people, I respond by saying Exactly, because it all comes down to leadership. The state is only as good as its leaders, which is why the prophets always focused on the particular Judge or King who was in power, and he is credited or faulted for whatever the people did as a whole.
About the American Thinker response to Pinker, even if no taxation is a theoretical-halachical ideal (achieved by the greatest Jewish leaders in history like Moses and Samuel who never took anything from anybody), the halacha allows the king to take a 10% tax on (basically) income because most leaders will not live up to the Mosaic standard because they are human.
My experience tells me that if Democracy is the ideal system of governance (or at least of deciding on who governs) the Torah would have prescribed it for us. But it did not, and despite the Kotzker blogger’s recent article asserting that the adoption of p’suqei d’zimra was in response to the fall of the exilarchs, we have, since Davidic times, held up his type of monarchy as at least a romanticized if not fully realized ideal system worth reinstating. (Consider that if on a weekday, one were to not pray for Davidic restoration, he would not fulfill his obligation of daily prayer.)
Rather, despite our best efforts to create fair socio-political systems, we find that most, whether on the level of the nuclear family to superpowers and empires, devolve into some form of dictatorship, one man who consolidates power, with the only difference between say, the Pax Americana presidents and obvious tyrants being that the former eventually left office voluntary and oversaw systems that allowed the people to live and conduct their business relatively freely. Indeed, a society constituted of people who practiced the Torah as an all-encompassing law (without foolish, man-made additions) would approximate a libertarian utopia, but more so, our sages realized that because in the end there is only man, the best we can hope for is that the dictator is benevolent. A David and not a Herod. That opinionated rasha, Christopher Hitchens, who was wont to point out his own monarchy’s faults, aptly observed that “Monarchy is a hereditary disease that can only be cured by fresh outbreaks of itself.”
In his own cynical way, he was saying that when we are left with the type of dictator we can’t stand, the best we can hope for is that the next dictator will be more palatable. That is why the halacha declares that monarchy should solely be granted to kosher Davidians, ones who have the necessary moral character and follow the Torah that teaches them to remain humble, to not run after wealth, physical pleasures, and power, and to limit their work to maintaining (Torah) law and order and national security.
On the practical level, I agree with what you wrote in response to RYYJ
In the end, the only thing that stopped the shelling of Israel’s northern cities was the United Nations. We needed the gentiles again for our safety…)
No, the physical insecurity is rather due to lack of Bitachon in the Master of the World, and cravenly trying to appear Goyishly “moral”, due to anti-Zionism 
on a philosophical level.
On a practical level, this means that the prime ministers, etc., should have used their God-granted capabilities to fight back. Which is the ideal and historical Jewish response. To put our trust in the Lord, to pray to Him and fast, and then go out and win the milchemet mitzva.

When the Government Wants To Commit Atrocities, It Needs Medical Infrastructure

Shmot, Exodus Chapter 1 And Medical Tyranny

 rafifarber

Exodus, Chapter 1, verses 21 and 22. The context, Pharaoh had just commanded the midwives to kill Israelite boy babies in secret as they were being born. The midwives disobey, and do not kill the babies. Then the verse says:

“And it was that because the midwives feared God, that he made them houses. And Pharaoh commanded his people saying, “All boy babies shall be thrown into the Nile, and all girls shall live.”

Who made who houses? The classic explanation is that God made the midwives houses for not murdering the babies. But that makes little sense as a simple explanation. God doesn’t build houses for people, generally speaking. But Abarbanel provides a very different explanation, and a much simpler one. He says:

It can be explained that “he made them houses” does not refer back to God, and has nothing to do with any benefits given to the midwives mentioned above. Rather, it is connected to what is written afterwards, “And Pharaoh commanded his people saying, ‘All boy babies born should be thrown into the Nile.’”

The meaning of the verse then, is this: That when the midwives made excuses as to why they didn’t kill the babies, Pharaoh tried to remedy the problem by building official and recognizable government sponsored birthing centers, so that everyone should know that this is a birthing center, so that every woman in labor could go there and get a midwife. While commanding this, he told his people that when they hear a knock at the birthing center, they should take the baby and throw it in the Nile.

Abarabenel on Shmot

When the government wants to commit atrocities, it uses medical infrastructure to do so. And the reason why Pharaoh built those houses, is that he wanted to thin out the Israelite population.

From The Jewish Libertarian, here.