How Kotzk Ended… (למיחש!)

Read a compilation of versions of the rumors about Kotzker chassidus’ mysteriously murky and sudden end on the (ironically named!) “Kotzk Blog” here…

Bear in mind the Kotzker Rebbe’s admitted, shameless Chassidic-antinomianism against the Shulchan Aruch presumably preceding this incident (plus one live example).

We should also mention the Kotzker’s very own vort:

הרבי מקוצק המליץ על דרשת חז”ל “את השם אלקיך תירא, לרבות תלמידי חכמים” – היינו, גם תלמיד חכם זקוק ליראת שמים!
This is no mere antiquarian muckraking; there are many lessons to be learned here for those who know about Kotzk!

P.S., In connection with the Gemara quoted in one version there (“במקום שיש חלול השם אין חולקין כבוד לרב”), see also this timely piece.

Connecting to Korbanos, A Dialogue

 

Question: Please explain all this business about animal sacrifices in the Temple. Are you really planning to re-initiate this at some point?

Answer: Cain and Abel made vegetable and animal sacrifices. Noah made animal sacrifices. AbrahamIsaac and Jacob—all highly enlightened people—made animal sacrifices. And the Torah prescribes a whole slew of sacrifices to be made in the Tabernacle in the desert, and then later in the Holy Temple in Jerusalem. And guess what? In our prayers, for the past 2,000 years, we’ve been asking for G‑d to let us rebuild that Temple so that we can start doing those sacrifices, just like He asked us to. So there’s got to be something deep going on here, more than meets the eye.

Q: But the whole thing doesn’t make sense! Charity, prayer, study . . . all those I can understand. But why on earth would G‑d want us to burn animals on an altar?

A: Now, don’t get the idea that you’re the first one to have difficulty with this. It puzzled the students of Maimonides in the 12th century. It puzzled the students of the rabbis of the Talmud. In the Zohar it’s written that the secret of the sacrifices reaches to the secret of the infinite. It’s one of those things that if it doesn’t puzzle you, you just haven’t gotten the facts straight. I think we need to look at this from a very different perspective to make sense of it.

Q: It all looks like just a holdover from pagan rites.

A: It’s clear that there are some major distinctions between the sacrificial order of the Torah and your typical ancient-world pagan rites. For one thing, the rules and regulations were spelled out right there for all to read. In fact, every Jew has an obligation to study the details of the Temple rites. Even little children are supposed to learn everything those priests are to be doing. That’s a far cry from the cult of secrecy that empowered the priestly class of other nations.

There were some other major distinctions: The Temple was considered the property of the people, and daily communal sacrifices reinforced that fact. There were no male or female prostitutes wandering around the courtyards, no orgies or drunken revelry—or self-mutilation. The priests wore modest, standardized clothes, and were held accountable by a people’s court that sat right there at the edge of the Temple complex. Most of the meat was eaten—a lot less waste than what goes on at Safeway or Stop & Shop. And animals were slaughtered in a humane fashion. Definitely a sublime relief from ancient standards. All in all, it must have seemed a very strange place for the average Joe Ancient.

Q: But not to our standards today. If the whole point was to wean the people off sacrificial cultism, then it was good for then. But why should we be praying for it to return? Sure, it’s cool to have a central place for prayer and meditation, with the menorah, the incense, the tablets that Moses brought . . . but why the butcher shop?

A: The main act of a sacrifice was not the physical act of slaughtering an animal. You understand that the sacrificial service was principally a spiritual one.

Q: In what way?

A: Well, for one thing, when a person brought a sacrifice, his mental focus was crucial. If his mind was not focused on the correct meaning and intent of the sacrifice, the whole thing could be deemed useless, or worse.

Q: What sort of meanings?

A: Well, if it was being brought to atone for some inadvertent sin, he had to have in mind some remorse over what had happened. But it went far beyond that: The priests would focus their minds on the higher spiritual spheres, according to esoteric traditions. That explains why they had the Levites singing and the musicians playing. After all, if it was all just a grand barbecue, what need was there for inspirational music? Rather, it was a deep spiritual experience for all involved. You went away truly elevated.

Q: Okay, I can see the experiential quality of it all: an ancient temple with heavenly music and mystical song; priests in flowing robes deep in meditation; mesmerizing, choreographed ritual. It’s an image I hadn’t realized before.

A: Most people don’t.

Continue reading…

From Chabad.org, here.

Interested in Modes of Managed Media? Here’s a Simple Observation

Friday, February 03, 2023
Human Rights Watch’s website was silent on the Neve Yaakov massacre last Friday night.
Six days later, they do mention it – in the context of an article condemning Israel for sealing up the houses of the family of the murderer.
The pattern, which we often see in the media as well, is predictable. When Gaza groups shoot rockets, the media only condemns Israel’s reaction. When a terrorist kills Jewish civilians, human rights groups wait as long as they can to create a context where Israel is the guilty party.
Look how HRW frames the attack in Neve Yaakov:
Israeli authorities’ actions to seal the family homes in the occupied West Bank of two Palestinians suspected of attacks against Israelis amount to collective punishment, a war crime, Human Rights Watch said today.
This punitive measure, which Israeli authorities have said they will follow by demolishing the homes, comes amid a spike in violence that has cost the lives of 35 Palestinians and 6 Israelis since January 1, 2023. The violence has included Israeli army raids that unlawfully attack Palestinian cities and refugee camps, Palestinian attacks on Israelis, and attacks on Palestinians and their property by Israeli settlers, who rarely face punishment for these crimes. 
“Deliberate attacks on civilians are reprehensible crimes,” said Omar Shakir, Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch. “But just as no grievance can justify the intentional targeting of civilians in Neve Yaakov, such attacks cannot justify Israeli authorities intentionally punishing the families of Palestinian suspects by demolishing their homes and throwing them out on the street.”
Notice how you can never find a straight condemnation of attacks on Jews without a caveat or a “context” in the same sentence.  As if sealing or demolishing a home is just as bad as murdering people.
Neither Amnesty nor Human Rights Watch had a stand-alone article condemning Palestinian terror attacks last year when there were several mass casualty events against civilians. Those attacks are also buried in this HRW article, seemingly mentioned for the first time on the site, and do not rate a full sentence: “The [Jenin] raid follows more than 10 months of intensified Israeli army raids in the West Bank, after several deadly attacks by Palestinians inside Israel in March 2022.”
There were also fatal attacks in April and May and October and November, but HRW already dedicated about 10% of the article to attacks on Israelis, and that is way above their quota already.

גם מחבר ספר ‘ויואל משה’ הסכים להדפסת ספר אם הבנים שמחה

ניתן לשמוע עדות בנו של הרב סנדר דייטש, בעל בית הדפוס (וראש הקהל בסאטמאר), באתר JDN כאן…

אני אפרש.

א’, רבי יואל מסאטמר החשיב יותר מדי יחוס ומדינת אונגרין והכרת משפחות (ואולי גם גדלות בתורה).

ב’, חלק גדול ממה שהטריד אותו ואת תלמידיו עד היום שיהודים משתמשים בתוה”ק כקרדום להגדיל ולפאר את ה”פארטיי” שלהם, כגון חיבת ציון, אגו”י והמזרחי וכו’. אבל אם יבא אחד ויפרש פסוקים ודברי חז”ל באופן הנראה תמוה לכאורה הרי בס”ד נוכל לישב גם אותו, ע”ד “וגם מקננו ילך עמנו לא תשאר פרסה כי ממנו נקח לעבד את השם”. גם בכל מקום שלפי פשוטן של דברים בדלות מוחנו קשה להבין, ודאי זהו משום קוצר המשיג ועומק המושג, ונשאיר בצ”ע לבד ותיק”ו. ומשנה לא זזה ממקומה.

כן נראה לע”ד.