‘Shelo Asani Isha’ – Yes, Women Are Inferior to Men!

Dear Reader: If you want to pretend Judaism is feminist, go away; it is not. And if you think you can use this truth to attack Judaism, you hardly need my help. If you want the truth for its own sake, however, read on.

Shelo Asani Isha“: Dishonest apologists would have you believe this blessing says nothing “against” womankind at all, at least according to some commentators. Actually, it does, and cheap Mussarite/Aggadic books do not count as dissent in any way.

Question:

Wait. If you are right and manage to prove your point, what of the damage you might do (on the margin, anyway)? Why create or exacerbate feelings of inferiority?

Answer:

Everyone, all humans, should be feeling inferiority, not self-esteem. But we are inferior in different ways (this is called the division of labor). Judaism is theocentric, and therefore biased against all human beings.

As Jews say on Rosh Hashana:

אדם יסודו מעפר וסופו לעפר. בנפשו יביא לחמו. משול כחרס הנשבר. כחציר יבש וכציץ נובל. כצל עובר וכענן כלה וכרוח נושבת וכאבק פורח וכחלום יעוף. ואתה הוא מלך אל חי וקים.

The ArtScroll Machzor translates:

A man’s origin is from dust, and his destiny is back to dust, at risk of his life he earns his bread; he is likened to a broken shard, withering grass, a fading flower, a passing shade, a dissipating cloud, a blowing wind, flying dust, and a fleeting dream. But you are the King, the living and enduring God.

The key to this matter is my explanation of the flaw in [genuine] racism:

There are differences, negative and positive between people. But the response should not be: Therefore I’m better. Rather, we’re all lacking.

We have said the same thing in the past to those who stress the faults of communities not their own and I would say the same to those who stress the faults of womankind.

“The Unlimited” has limited us all in different ways. We are meant to stand together for the right goals, compensating for our weaknesses.

The Rambam introduces the Bracha’s text in Hilchos Tefillah 7:6:

ומברך אדם בכל יום ברוך אתה יי’ אלהינו מלך העולם שלא עשני גוי ברוך אתה יי’ אלהינו מלך העולם שלא עשני אשה ברוך אתה יי’ אלהינו מלך העולם שלא עשני עבד.

The simple, straightforward meaning of “For not having made me a woman” (Shelo asani isha) – especially as versus the customary feminine “For having made me according to His will” (She’asani keretzono) – is obvious. We are thanking Hashem for being obligated in more commandments, while women meekly “justify Hashem’s harsh judgment” (Tur here: ואפשר שנוהגים כן שהוא כמי שמצדיק עליו הדין על הרעה).

The same holds for manifold similarly “offensive” texts. Any radically different interpretation of Scripture and Chazal is an unintentional (?) anachronism. Try to imagine the “Ba’alei Hashemu’ah” standing before you, and then tell me – with a straight face – they meant “women are more spiritual”, or some such modern, egalitarian idea. Even Maharal and the like, coming about fifteen centuries later, would agree their “expositions” here and elsewhere are but homiletic.

Yes, we are all equal as regards our capacity to come close to the Divine, relatively speaking, as says the known Rambam in Teshuvah 5:2 כל אדם ראוי לו להיות צדיק כמשה רבינו או רשע כירבעם, and therefore in our general obligation to do so, but not in our station while doing so. There are kings, priests, poor and rich, etc. Some are born non-Jewish (and must convert). Some mitzvos were only given once, to one generation or to one person. Tough!

Moreover, women are often the legal “Other” (עם בפני עצמן הן) in the androcentric Jewish code of law — as seen even in the casual, standard language of the above Rambam: מברך אדם בכל יום, cf. Magen Avraham 46:9.

“Inspirational” speakers say women are “different but equal”, who have less mitzvos because they have less to “rectify”, which is like saying low-level workers earn less, not because they are less valuable, but because their jobs just so happen to be less responsible, and the company needs all kinds of jobs performed, blah blah… Surprise: Life is not “fair”.

Oh, but women are physically weaker, more empathetic, [shallowly] altruistic, catty (eh, scratch out the last one), so they are born more Godly! That’s what’s “Kertzono” means. They have way more potential than men! Didn’t Shlomo Hamelech say: _אדם אחד מאלף מצ… (eh, never mind that last one)?

Hello, your list of “godliness” attributes is Cursedian! Quit the empty slogans. Are we really going to analyze a word from a made-up bracha which isn’t מטבע שטבעו חכמים (like הנותן ליעף כח), see Pri Chadash (O. C. 46)? And the “potential” for what, exactly?

We might as well pretend the proposed “Shelo asani bur” blessing (who has not made me an ignoramus) in gemara Menachos 43b is, likewise, in no sense opposed to ignorance…

Bottom line: We should each look down on our inherently worthless human selves, and thank Hashem for granting us the undeserved gift of his many mitzvos.

All genders get to sing: “Shelo asani Goy (or ‘Goya’!)”, as we recall the inscription in Hashem’s tefillin (so to speak), and as Hashem listens closely to our words, and grins (so to speak).

P.S. For more references on this, see Marc Shapiro here.

Is There Any Prohibition Against Falsehood (Outside Beis Din, of Course)?

Or what is the source in the Torah forbidding Jews from uttering lies?

It’s commonly assumed lying is forbidden from the verse מדבר שקר תרחק, and so hold Semag (Asin 107) and Semak (226). Chafetz Chaim’s foreword to the Laws of Lashon Hara says so too, but he doesn’t supply proof. But perhaps the verse refers, as it seems from context, only to Dinim and Dayanim:

לא תטה משפט אבינך בריבו. מדבר שקר תרחק ונקי וצדיק אל תהרג כי לא אצדיק רשע. ושחד לא תקח כי השחד יעור פקחים ויסלף דברי צדיקים.

It is at least debatable if there are Torah laws against pride and anger, too (contemporary Mussar books discuss this).

Rabbi Yerucham Fishel Perle on Rabbenu Sa’adya Gaon (Aseh 22) writes:

… ומעתה מה שתמה הרשב”ץ ז”ל איך אפשר שלא יהי’ לנו מ”ע בדבור אמת לא ידענא מקום קושיא כלל. דודאי בדברים שבין אדם לחבירו יש לנו כמה אזהרות בתורה. בדיינים כתיב מדבר שקר תרחק. ובעדים כתיב לאו דלא תענה וגו’. ובאונאת דברים כתיב לא תונו. ובגניבת הדעת כתיב לא תגנבו וכתיב לא תכחשו ולא תשקרו איש בעמיתו. אבל בדברי שקר זולת זה שהם פטומי מילי בעלמא. אף דמדה מגונה ודבר גנאי הוא לדבר בם. מכל מקום על כל פנים לית בהו איסורא מן התורה כלל. ואפילו מדרבנן נראה דלא אסרום. כמו שנתבאר. ואם כן אין כאן שום גמגום על מוני המצות שלא מנו עשה זו דמדבר שקר תרחק. דלא קאי אלא אדיינים.

Kesubos 17a is not clear proof, see Tosafos there, but lies seem included in “Devarim Beteilim”, just like Leitzanus.

Unfinished.

Our Holy Forefathers Did Aveiros!

Whenever Mashgichim (and those influenced by them) speak of past generations’ sins (which are numerous and mentioned everywhere), there is the tired, obligatory disclaimer:

Just as the pluperfect Roshei Yeshivos of old would tell our perfect teachers who in turn would tell us when we were sitting in your place a thousand times, and as we have bored you with a million times, we are not, in fact, discussing the students of Rabbi Akiva or the Shevatim. We are speaking to and of ourselves, handily using them כאדם שמקלל עצמו ותולה קללתו באחרים. And we aren’t speaking of Biblical personalities, but repeating Chazal, who teach us the ways of life; they too merely using our inherently perfect primogenitors as poor paradigms.

So, to drill deeper, when we mention these angels’ names, we refer not to the discarnate giants themselves, Tzaddik forfend, but to these Platonic Ideals made flesh elsewhere, in lesser, fallen specimens; those who do, in fact, you know… SIN.

Is it clear yet, or should I say it once more, for those who only perk up the third time a thing is said?

Ugh. The end.

While, indeed, the Torah’s message is central, not the facts employed (and the same, as Yeshayahu Leibowitz said, goes for the science), the message itself includes that humans tend to sin, with some degree of malice – all of them. Even if they didn’t sin today, they sinned yesterday, and עברה גוררת עברה, slight Meizid leads to some large Shogeg. The very greatness of the individuals amplifies the lesson we cannot rely on ourselves and must be forever vigilant and precede prayer to escape the evil inclination.

And we cannot relate to angels, so we cannot learn anything at all from them if they are “angels”, and us “donkey” shadows.

No matter how much the sin is “explained” (the person had good intentions, etc.), even if this is the case, there must still be some degree of sinfulness remaining, otherwise, why is it mentioned against them, and/or why were they punished? (And don’t we, too, often have good intentions? Except, we are partially deceiving ourselves beneath the ingenious justifications, the same way they did.)

The big problem is, this Mussar nonsense prevents us from improving upon the past…!

Helping Someone Who Can Readily Help Himself Is Chessed?

In the Mussar Yeshivos, they (?) decided, that when the Bachurim waited in line to wash their hands for a meal, each should fill the cup for the next in line so as to “earn” Chessed from an action they would have taken anyway. The dozens in line are still filling up the cup each time, except they are doing it supposedly “altruistically”, instead.

In other words, they took on the role Chazal delegated to the servants of “Nosnim layadayim”, just as the important students got the “privilege” of cleaning the Yeshiva (even Yehoshua didn’t clean, just organize). (This wouldn’t work with Tevillas Yadayim, by the way.)

But how is it Chessed to help someone who can just as easily help himself?! It most probably isn’t. No one benefits one iota, except the last in line, and no one did anything extra but the first.

I don’t know why they ceased this custom. Maybe that’s why it was called the “Talmud Torah” of Kelm (sorry!).

As opposed to Chassidei Ashkenaz of old who kept similar notions as private as possible (and emphatically didn’t regard it as Chessed to share their insights with other “Mevakshim”), Mussarkeit has today become almost a minimum requirement in some circles. At least Mussarites mostly stopped coming up with crazy, new ways of being interpersonally “holy”.

So, What’s Been Popular Lately?

These beauties:

Rabbi Bar Chaim Explains the Difference Between Shok and Yerech

קול החינוך גליונות #103, 104#, 105#

The True Techeiles

הרב יואל ראטה שליט”א – חתמת על הכתובה?! צא לעבוד…

Women Praying with Tefillin, Tallis and Kippah at the Western Wall?!

Jordan Peterson on Dostoevsky’s Doctrine

כן, זה אנטי-ציונות, אבל זה גם נגד המדינה

מקצת על שלמה אבינר וחטא שתיקת הרבנים

This Is the ‘Light’ of Mussar You’re Sad About Missing…

Rabbi Yichya Kapach – A Short Introduction

Want to receive a free, special ebook in Hebrew on answering atheists? Subscribe to Hyehudi Daily Newsletter (and best send me a separate email)!