Breslov Isn’t Mussar Either

Sichos Haran Chaper 124:

פעם אחת שאל אותי בלשון תמה: השמעת ממני דברי מוסר? ואמר שאינו יכול לומר דברי מוסר. כי כל דבור מוסר שלו הוא מוטבל ומורחץ בדמעות ומחמת זה אינו יכול לומר מוסר בפרוש.

ובתחלה היה אצלנו קצת תמיהה מה שאמר שאינו אומר מוסר. כי לפי דעתנו כל דבריו הם דברי מוסר גדול מאד מאד כאש בוערת ממש. אך באמת לא היה רגיל לומר דברי מוסר בפרוש כדרך המוכיחים, אבל אף על פי כן כל דבריו וכל שיחותיו היה רק מענין עבודת ה’. וכל דבריו היה כגחלי אש ממש.

ומי שזכה לשמע דבור מפיו היה נכנס בקרבו כאש בוערת ממש. ואי אפשר לבאר ולציר לא בכתב ולא בפה עצם תבערת קדושת דבוריו שיצאו מפיו הקדוש והנורא בקדושה ובטהרה. אשר כל דבור ודבור שלו אפלו בשיחת חולין, מכל שכן כשהיה מדבר בעבודת השם או כשהיה אומר ומגלה תורה, היה כל דבור ודבור מאיר ומזהיר ומתלהב כאש לוהט רשפי רשפי שלהבת. ומי שהיה מאזין ומקשיב לדבריו באמת ובתמימות היה כל דבור ודבור שלו פורח ונכנס בקרבו כלבת אש ממש עד שכל אחד מהשומעים היו נמשכין על ידי דבוריו להשם יתברך בהתקשרות נפלא והתלהבות גדולה להשם יתברך באמת. ועל פי רב היה נדמה לנו באותו שעה שעמדנו לפני הדרת קדושתו הנורא, שבודאי לא יהיה לנו עוד שום בחירה. כי בודאי בהכרח להיות כרצון השם יתברך ואי אפשר לפרד עוד מהשם יתברך. מכל שכן לשנות רצונו יתברך לעבר חס ושלום אפלו איזה דבר קל בעלמא. כי הלב היה נמשך מאד מאד להשם יתברך על ידי דבוריו הקדושים אשר אי אפשר לשער ולערך.

גם עכשו כל מי שיעסק בספרי רבנו הקדוש והנורא זכר צדיק וקדוש לברכה, ויעין ויסתכל בהם באמת ובתמימות ודאי יתלהב לבו מאד להשם יתברך כי כל דבריו כגחלי אש.

What’s the Difference Between Mussar and Self-Development?

OK. I mean the least effective type.

Well, guess what? I found a rabbi on Torah.org who tries to answer this question.

I’ll interject a bit:

By Rabbi Ephraim D. Becker, Ph.D.

What is the difference between Mussar and other forms of personal growth?

I’ve been asked any number of times how Mussar differs from Covey, Pransky, Positive Psychology and a host of other self-improvement programs and concepts. You may find yourself asking the same question and I’d like to save you the call.

I’d say there isn’t any difference between the two.

Mussar, the Torah’s approach to personal growth has, at its most fundamental core, the call to utilize the entire physical world in the service of the transcendent, eternal world. The Torah calls upon every human being (both Jews and Gentiles in different ways) to recognize this world as the place to activate G-d’s Will through the use of the physical world of things, feelings, thoughts and actions. The Torah teaches us how to harness the material world in the service of transcendent connection to eternity.

By contrast, other forms of self-improvement are aimed at capitalizing on the transcendent aspect of a person in the service of the physical world. Being calmer, meditating, looking beyond the moment, understanding values, prioritizing and so on are all seen as tools in the pursuit of a better physical existence, whether that means a better marriage, friendships, a job or even a vacation. The point of self-improvement is to harness the transcendent world of a person in the service of his physical existence.

The difference is 180 degrees.

No, it isn’t. You’re both into “spirituality”, not religion, i.e., serving God. Otherwise, Mussar wouldn’t even have a name.

There are those self-improvement programs (notably in Eastern Religions) that have placed such a value on transcendence that they put the physical world at the service of their push for transcendence. If you push for the answer to why, the answer is because it’s a better way to live. Again, transcendence in the service of the physical world is the message.

Torah is the G-d-given recipe for being closer to Him, eternally. It is not about avoiding damnation nor is it about being redeemed from sin, though those are certainly included in the Torah recipe. Mussar is the arm of Torah that focuses on the specifics of how a physical, created, conflicted human being can transcend and utilize the limitations which are imposed by his base-physicality to become G-dlike, G-d-emulating and ever more closely attached to the pleasure of proximity to Him. The person doesn’t need to be redeemed; he needs to be activated.

Rabbi Becker is using so many words not to be cute or clear, but because he doesn’t have an answer.

Without the revelation of His Will on Mt Sinai all of the other self- improvement programs run just fine. With no directive from G-d there is nothing to do but try to improve your life here. With the revelation at Sinai the only program is Mussar. Everything else is abusing (sorry for the extreme term) spirituality in order to achieve a more blissful life in this world. Torah is about utilizing (indeed, abusing, from the perspective of one who is trying to achieve a blissful world here) this world in the service of His Will.

“Spirituality” is this-worldly.

We are striving to become better and better servants of Hashem, using only this life and this world to do so, while self-improvement is about using all of the transcendence latent in a person to make our lives in this world better and better.

I cannot be a scrooge and say that I’m unhappy with the programs which help people have better marriages, more successful jobs, be happier, have less depression, etc. I’m not a scrooge and my service to and relationship with G-d includes my celebration of everything and anything which lightens the load of another person, Jew or Gentile. So I am happy when I hear that people go off to retreats and come back calmer, have a better marriage or get/keep a life-sustaining job. That’s great news. Period.

Of course. The means are different, but the goal is exactly the same. Indeed, if Judaism was of interest, lightening the load of “Gentiles” would not make the Mussarite happier at all:

Sanhedrin 71b:

בן סורר ומורה נידון על שם סופו ימות זכאי ואל ימות חייב שמיתתן של רשעים הנאה להן והנאה לעולם לצדיקים רע להן ורע לעולם יין ושינה לרשעים הנאה להן והנאה לעולם ולצדיקים רע להן ורע לעולם פיזור לרשעים הנאה להן והנאה לעולם ולצדיקים רע להן ורע לעולם כנוס לרשעים רע להן ורע לעולם ולצדיקים הנאה להן והנאה לעולם שקט לרשעים רע להן ורע לעולם לצדיקים הנאה להן והנאה לעולם.

What all that does is give us more material to transform into service of Hashem. Don’t stop when your life is better; that’s not the goal; it’s a tool and its value is measured in terms of how it is used. Use your good marriage to emulate Hashem and His kindness. Use the peace of mind your improved job security affords to focus with more clarity on your Torah study, your performance of Mitzvos, on your freedom to live with honesty and integrity according to the Torah’s definitions of those terms, your ability to stay focused and undistracted by the myriad attempts of mischief to distract you. If you’re exercising regularly then you have more stamina to serve Hashem. If you are eating well then your body is less sluggish, less demanding and now you are freer to put your body to work in the Divine Misssion. Mussar is about the process of doing that.

Self-improvement may be included in the long list of tools to put to the service of the Divine Mission. However, failure to put them in their proper perspective runs the risk of leaving the person feeling like he/she has activated his/her transcendence without connecting Soul to Source. That is a terrible tragedy. I see it daily with people who get involved in Kabala, pseudo-mussar, and a host of other attempts to drain the wellspring of transcendence in each of us so that the Soul is fooled into serving the Body and fails to connect to the Source. I almost wish the person had remained in his/her hedonistic rut until ready to wake up to Sinai instead of having the Soul-craving slaked at a mirage fountain.

Define Mussar without all the buzzwords. Then define pseudo-mussar.

If I’ve not hammered it home enough here, please ask. From where I’m sitting, I’ve repeated myself more times in this article than I have in virtually any piece I’ve allowed to go past my screen.

I hope I’ve saved you a call.

The end.

Who Mangles Rambam More, Mussar or Brisk?

Rambam Hilchos Talmud Torah 3:7:

שמא תאמר, עד שאקבץ ממון אחזור ואקרא, עד שאקנה מה שאני צריך ואפנה מעסקי, ואחזור ואקרא. אם תעלה מחשבה זו על לבך אין אתה זוכה לכתרה של תורה לעולם. אלא עשה תורתך קבע ומלאכתך עראי, ולא תאמר לכשאפנה אשנה, שמא לא תפנה.

Mashgichim are accustomed to “proving” from the wording that, even if the thought itself temporarily crossed your mind, “you won’t merit the crown of Torah” forevermore!

The true meaning in Mishneh Torah refers to the duration of the idea’s control over you (especially because there is no primary source for anyone to claim otherwise): Negate the niggling notion that you may progress.

Mashgichim do not know how to read Rishonim!

Mussar Is Antinomian!

With Heaven’s help, as hoped, I quote and comment on text reproduced on the Daas Torah website from Rabbi Dov Katz in “Pulmus Hamussar” (page 337).

I have not seen this in the Hebrew original; my remarks relate to the words as written. Nor do I write solely of the author, rather to all those who would agree with his specific message as presented; that is, too many.

Wait, what are you saying?

I’m asking you to be insulted for your own skins, not someone else.

Before we start, please bear in mind who bears the onus of proof. Mussar is the… let us be gracious: newcomer, to put things unduly neutrally.

Quoting Rabbi Katz:

Two attitudes towards mitzvos

There are two basic attitudes towards mitzvos. The first attitude is that Mitzvos are what G-d has commanded us and the only task is to know exactly what has been commanded. Therefore the sole concern is halacha and its most complete observance. The second attitude is that Mitzvos are the means that G-d has given us to self-perfection. Therefore it is critical that the Mitzvos be done in such a way that they increase perfection. This requires introspection and self understanding rather than a mechanical performance. The latter position is the foundation of the Mussar approach – the former is the foundation of the opponents of mussar.

“Only task”, “sole concern”, etc. yes. “Mechanical” performance no. The great task of knowing “exactly” what has been commanded stems from an inner devotion, “Lishma”, incommensurable with Mussar’s false passion. Yet delusional “introspection and self-understanding” are not a standalone Mitzva at all, such that their Jewish, religious value is zero. Taken literally, “self-perfection” is impossible for us humans, Mussarized or not. Proper performance of the mitzva does not result in self-perfection, but maybe self-improvement is a happy by-product.

The halachasist position thus is that self-perfection is entirely the result of the proper performance of the mitzva. Therefore the only concern is study and clarification of the best way to perform the mitzva. It has no concern with investigation of the hidden aspect of man or concern with clarification of theological issues. It is not concerned with the separate focus on perfection of personality. In fact there are no specialized concerns. The only thing is doing the mitzvos according to their details in the most direct and simple way. … The concern is not on the goal of personality development or understanding of theology but to maximize Torah study and knowledge of halacha – without concern for introspection and worry about motivation. Perfection is a side consequence – not a conscious goal. In contrast the Mussar approach views mitzvos only as a means to perfection.

Investigation of the hidden aspect of man or concern with clarification of theological issues“? Mussar theories of man’s innards are unsupported, emotionalist nonsense. “Theology” is either false or Aggadeta. Anything meaningful lifted from these Boodisht buzzwords is part and parcel of Torah study; which happens to be another — well, yes, how did you ever guess? — Mitzva!

Thus they feel that the will of G‑d is not fulfilled by merely observing mitzvos as simply the command of G‑d. But rather there must be a conscious effort to elevate the image of man and attaching oneself to spiritual and personal elevation. The foundation point of this view is to see mitzvos not as an end but as a means. It is not sufficient to merely fulfill the mitzvos in a mechanical physical way. The concern is rather with the content and the motivation of the heart, thought and emotion. The main influence is not the physical activity of the limbs – even though they don’t ignore the importance of doing mitzvos – but the personal involvement and inner arousal.

Rabbi Katz appends to pre-Mussar Judaism altogether two “merelys” and three “onlys”. Then: In contrast the Mussar approach views mitzvos only as a means to perfection. Where mitzvos are “only” a means to perfection, they are no longer mitzvos. Like it or not, the definition of mitzva – all of them alike, is religious, not therapeutic. Yet, he immediately says, “the will of G‑d is not fulfilled by merely observing mitzvos as simply the command of G‑d“, a tight thorny thicket of throaty contradiction. Are we being “dialectical”? Has Mussar addled his brains?

Oh, but this is only a “feeling“! Carry right on, then…

Personal involvement and inner arousal“? How do you think any mitzvos ever get done?! Do you know about the disutility of labor? Everyone else knows Mussarite “spiritual and personal elevation” is vain. We are all laughing at you behind your back (sans Lashon Hara)!

Now the double-talk thankfully subsides, it is time for plainspoken truth:

Mussar not only bears no relation to Judaism, it rejects the yoke of Heaven and mitzvos, and subverts mitzvos for man’s puny pleasure, instead of Divine worship. Mussar is but another newfangled movement faking “added depth” for the sake of shifting priorities away from boring, “physical” observance (like Torah study). There is a fine definition for this reeking refuse: Jewish antinomianism.

Yeshayahu Leibowitz would agree