העורך Editor

Sort of…

The hyperlinked evidence, from an excerpt on Lewrockwell.com:

In Israel, the main negative implication of U.S. largesse has been promotion of socialism. Had our country not been financially supporting a heavily unionized and socialized economy in Israel, these policies would likely have never been as large as they were, and would have diminished much sooner. There are strong empirical illustrations attesting to the correlation between size of government and economic regulations, on the one hand, and attenuation of the economy on the other (Gwartney, James, Robert Lawson and Walter Block. 1996. Economic Freedom of the World, 1975—1995, Vancouver, B.C. Canada: the Fraser Institute. For a non-empirical treatment of this phenomenon, see Smith, Adam. [1776] 1979. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund).

(It seems to be missing from LRC, but can still be found here.)

At mealtimes, fast.

In conversation be still.

Among company find solitude.

• Rabbi Yitzchak of Vurka

The usual claim for the Gadol of each generation’s authority is this Gemara (Bava Metzia 91b):

אמר רב חנן בר רבא אמר רב, אפילו ריש גרגותא משמיא מוקמי ליה.

So every leadership position is ordained from Above. But might the flock ever deserve less than ideal leaders? Might not the leader be a hint and rebuke to those being led to change their ways for the better?

Wait, here’s another Gemara, Bava Kama 52a, which says just that:

מאי משכוכית? …רבי יעקב אומר, עיזא דאזלא בריש עדרא, כדדרש ההוא גלילאה עליה דרב חסדא, כד רגיז רעיא על ענא עביד לנגדא סמותא.

The leader is always chosen by Hashem, and everything Hashem does is for the good. But is that the immediate, obvious good or the more ultimate, atonement kind of “good”?

In fact, why not go back to the example itself? Anyone who has a tough boss, raise their hand!

So the question is, how is our generation doing in terms of observing Judaism? Well…

P.S. There is also the rarer possibility of a good generation with a bad leader and vice versa, as Chazal say in Sanhedrin 103a.

It can’t be denied some Breslovers have disturbing tendencies (maybe they got it from Berland?). See more here for exempla, and the money quote:

I don’t think I have a problem with Breslov, but if it’s getting distorted into idolatry, I certainly do.

I now quote from centrist Breslov.org’s FAQ page:

Is the Rebbe an intermediary between the Chassid and God?

The Second Commandment forbids us to accept any mediator between God and man. There is no sense in which the Tzaddik carries out some form of devotion which then absolves the individual Jew from fulfilling his own religious duties. On the contrary, Rebbe Nachman’s teachings call on each Jew to accept responsibility for his life and take practical steps to develop his own personal relationship with God, especially through intense prayer and hisbodidus.

At the same time, Torah literature frequently portrays the Tzaddikim interceding with God on behalf of the Jewish People, as Moses did after the sin of the Golden Calf, when he prayed to God for forgiveness (Exodus 32:11-13). Similarly when the Jews were taken into exile in Babylon the soul of Rachel came forth from her grave entreating for mercy on their behalf (Rashi, Genesis 48:7). Rebbe Nachman thus emphasized the importance of turning to the Tzaddik to intercede in times of trouble. It is like when a private person is summoned to court. Recognizing his own inexperience in matters of law and court procedure, he turns to an experienced advocate to help put his case in the best possible light.

Belief in the power of the Tzaddik is quite different from relating to him as an intermediary. Having belief in the Tzaddik means recognizing one’s own inadequacies and accepting that the Tzaddik is wiser and more saintly. Because of the Tzaddik’s closeness to God, he is able to reveal the ways of serving God to others. The book, `Crossing the Nar row Bridge,’ (Chapter #17) explains this concept in detail.

From Breslov.org, here (question #14).