Remember How So Many Rabbanim Parroted Official Corona Lies?

Some excerpts from Steve Hall’s Substack:

What if you wanted to make  $$ Billions of dollars, in a hurry?  Guaranteed and without risk?

We have an excellent recent example.  Here is the blueprint that they used:

Patent a product that will sell worldwide in the billions of dollars, and in a very short time.  Make sure the government regulators are on your side by capturing the agency and by giving them a share of the profits via patents and royalties.  Have the government guarantee your sales with purchase contracts.  And, the cherry on top, make sure that the government protects you from all liability, in case of insufficient testing, faulty products or damages to the consumer.

Turns out that all they needed for this round was a new coronavirus (in the same family as the common cold and the seasonal flu).  But a virus intentionally made more contagious in government funded bio-warfare laboratories.  With a public primed to panic when faced with a pandemic.  And with governments around the world having already pre-planned their authoritarian responses.

The FDA has now approved the ivermectin treatment that they banned.  They have admitted that masks don’t work and that six feet apart was a random number.  The long term economic damage from lockdowns – and deciding which workers were not “essential” – is now unfolding.  The adverse reactions, including deaths, from taking the experimental shot can no longer be ignored.  In short, the extensive damages from the authoritarian responses to the new flu virus are apparent, for anyone who will listen.

They showed us the death counts.  But they did not differentiate between people who died WITH Covid (based on the unreliable PCR tests or generic “symptoms”) and those who died FROM Covid.  They even gave financial incentives if the doctors listed Covid as the cause of death, even when they were suffering from other fatal conditions or already dying.

They knew very early on that the vast majority of deaths from Covid were among the very old, as well as those with co-morbidities like heart disease and obesity.  For most people, the odds of hospitalization or dying from Covid were very, very tiny, with survival rates well over 99%.  And for children and younger healthy adults, the risk was just about zero.

We now know that the increase in the overall death rate during Covid – pre-vaccine – was small, and much of that due to the lives of the very elderly being shortened a few months or years (compounded by not receiving early treatment and by misuse of ventilators), or to not receiving treatment for other diseases, or for drug overdoses and suicides as a result of the lockdowns.

However, the increases in the death rate after the “vaccine” was mandated is another story; it is excessive.

At the same time that they were scaring everyone with infection rates and death rates, they banned any and all treatments.  Unlike any other disease, for two years there were no approved medicines.  Incredibly, we were told that we had to stay home and just live with it until we got so sick that we had to be hospitalized, which was obviously too late for many people.  Long-proven, truly safe and effective treatments were not only discouraged but also banned.  Fauci hypocritically told us that those medications – even though proved safe and effective and used worldwide for decades -had not undergone proper double-blind studies for this specific virus – yet neither had his new “vaccine.”

So they told us that we had to wait for the Trump miracle, coming at “warp speed.”  They disguised the fact that it was not a vaccine at all under the traditional definition; rather it was a new, experimental mRNA technology, and all of the normal testing procedures for vaccines were abandoned.

The incessantly repeated “95% effective” blather was the result of numbers games based on manipulated limited data.  The studies were cut short and did not address the risks and adverse reactions.  They had no idea of what long term problems their experiment might cause.  And as the number and severity of negative reactions and deaths from the jab have increased, they continue to hide, ignore and distort that data.

Ironically, Ivermectin is now approved.  Yet the doctors who were using it to successfully treat patients were censored, attacked and even lost their licenses.  Ivermectin, Vitamin D, and chloroquine, all cheap, all effective, could have saved literally hundreds of thousands of lives, based on the actual experiences in countries round the world.  The problem was that if those were approved for Covid treatment, then Pharma would be not be able to get the “emergency use authorization” for their experimental injection.

Read the rest here…

NOTE: I don’t endorse every claim made above. For example, regarding Ivermectin’s supposed FDA approval, see here.

Most Non-Techeiles Scholars: Even if They Were Right They Would STILL Be Wrong!

I’ll explain what I mean.

Imagine you ask a rabbi\Ben Torah\Yeshiva man\Avreich\etc. why we can’t light candles on Shabbos, and he said “Rabbi Chaim Kanievsky didn’t ignite fire on Shabbos, Rabbi Steinman never did, Rabbi Shmuel Auerbach was known never to light fire on Shabbos. We follow our Greats and don’t light candles on Shabbos either!”

Again, say you ask a rabbi\Ben Torah\Yeshiva man\Avreich\etc. why do we blow the shofar or listen to it on Rosh Hashana, and he told you “Rabbi Chaim Kanievsky definitely did so, Rabbi Steinman too (unless Rosh Hashana came out on Shabbos), Rabbi Shmuel Auerbach even gave a few shiurim (I heard personally) about blowing shofar. We always follow our Greats and therefore do likewise!”

Or you ask a rabbi\Ben Torah\Yeshiva man\Avreich\etc. why he got married, and he told you “I am simply following the unbroken chain of Mesorah from Har Sinai (and before, but never mind)! My father got married, my grandfather got married. My Admor, too, was once married, and so were all the Rebbes who directly preceded him in the holy dynasty of my Chassidus! That’s why I got married – kedas Moshe Veyisrael.”

Do you sense something “off” about this type of answer? I do.

Why not quote the actual source: Torah, Chazal? Surely a Jew with any degree of knowledge should be able to do better than “the Gedolim something something”!

So, even if most non-Techeiles Jews were (for the sake of argument) correct about not wearing Techeiles in Tzitzis for a legitimate reason, the arguments they give are truly an embarrassment. Doesn’t this area of Torah deserve their serious attention, no less than all others? It’s one thing if they have an actual argument they believe in, right or wrong. But davka for a rabbi\Ben Torah\Yeshiva man\Avreich\etc. to resort to the last defense of the “Am Haaretz-see, Am Haaretz-do” is disturbing.