העורך Editor

We just saw this with our eyes. Let’s not forget.

Excerpt from Bretigne’s Substack:

… Any information that went against the official narrative on Covid-19 was suppressed. Most egregiously, and with deadly consequences: Information on existing, effective, treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, IV vitamin C, and vitamin D were suppressed. Some – probably very large – number of people undoubtedly died because of this.

Once a “vaccine” was in development, any criticism of that vaccine was suppressed. After its release, this remained the case, even as the reports of adverse events began rolling in. (As an aside, here is a really important discovery regarding the under-reporting factor for VAERS.) And it is still the case, even as excess deaths worldwide have skyrocketed following the introduction of the vaccine. How many of these deaths are the direct result of the vaccine? How many lives might have been saved had there been free and open discussion of the risks of the vaccine? We will never know with certainty, but the number is obviously not zero, and very likely in the millions.

And it wasn’t private companies doing the censoring. Again Bretigne:

Here’s El Gato Malo (who was banned from Twitter back in January of 2021, with no reason given) doing a very good job of explaining how the state and its cronies were able to strong-arm social-media companies into censoring speech on their platforms:

“Private companies should be free to make their own choices about speech, publication, amplification, etc. I really, truly believe this and that any other path or practice leads to greater mischief. It is always worse to have the state tell you what you can and cannot say and a free market will always route around the limitations created by individual actors within it. That’s what markets do. It’s as inevitable as sunrise.

“But what breaks this and forces behavior into unified channels of suppression is state intervention to ensure that markets are not free and in a world as webbed by bureaucratic stricture as ours, this intervention need not be direct. It may easily be indirect and this starts to look like state sponsored extortion.

“’nice FCC license you got there. be a shame if you lost it because you let our political opponents speak.’

“’nice section 230/antitrust exemption and/or tax planning you got there. be a shame if someone did away with it, broke you up, and audited you till the cows come home.’

“’boy, that sure was some nasty, anti-competitive market fixing you used against PARLER. but we’ll look the other way if you play ball.’”

See the rest here…

Quoting “Save the Hilltop Youth” (abridged, see within):

We imagine a scenario in which someone like Pollard, and others who are outside the system, organize to form a Jewish “government-in-(internal)-exile” (along the lines of the ‘shadow cabinets’ that exist in British-style parliaments), that includes people like Feiglin and rabbis from the Eida Chareidit, Rabbi Azriel Auerbach of the Peleg Yerushalmi, maybe Rav Amnon Yitzchak (who has consistently been on the right side of most issues) and others who recognize the anti-Jewish nature of the current zionist regime and openly foment for its replacement.

Were such a body to come into being, it might accomplish two things —

1. The general public could be brought to believe that an alternative to the current, corrupt zionist apparatus is achievable, and
2. When the state does begin to disintegrate — a development we foresee as both inevitable and near — a living body with an independent Jewish bent would be available to move us toward a Third Temple reality.

Until then, the entire raison d’être of this group would be to mock, chide and defame the existing system and its participants, to reveal its outright goyische character and to provoke, in turn, a vicious response from the establishment that would cement in people’s minds the existence of a genuine Jewish alternative.

Importantly, no member of this would-be government-in-(internal)-exile would be permitted to express himself via any existing Israeli media outlet. Those outlets would be banned from all events, rallies, speaking engagements, press releases, manifestos, position papers, critiques, etc. They would be frozen out absolutely from contact with the group.

Only an alternative set of media and scribes would be permitted to engage the new body, and only they would have access to its members. Foreign media would also be granted complete access.

This, of course, would require strong discipline. But it would be necessary to send a message — that no one cares anymore for “official” reportage on the zionist drama, replete with its swiftly unfolding, breathless, live, sideline-coverage of the length of Bibi’s prostate incision.

…

Because all that’s required, in the end, is a minority of Jews to believe that there exists a stark alternative that’s worth listening to… and revolutionary change then becomes possible.

This, of course, would necessitate people like Pollard and Feiglin tossing away their egos and overcoming any notion they might harbor of “leading the nation”.

Because we really don’t need leaders of that sort.

Nothing personal.

We just need a king.

See the rest here…

Hmmm, like when the Brits still persecuted us.

Who will make the phone calls?

לא בדקתי בפנים, וזה אתר חשוד בהחלט, אבל הכותבת היא נינה של הג”ר יששכר שלמה טייכטל הי”ד והיא מביאה מספרו הגדול על עניין “ההתמהמהות של יהדות הגולה לשוב לארץ ישראל וליישבה עוד מימי עזרא הסופר, ואת מה שיקרה באחרית הימים אם יהדות הגולה לא תעלה לחונן את עפר ארץ ישראל מתוך בחירה”.

הנה הלינק…

A detailed debunking by The Mischling Review is here…

Excerpt:

Shortly after the World Trade Center was struck on September 11, 2001, residents of the Doric Apartment Corporation across the Hudson River witnessed three men taking what appeared to be video and photographs of the smoldering North Tower. What stood out was that all of them were inexplicably excited at the sight of the terrorist attack. The men were eventually detained and found to be Israelis who’d overstayed their visitor visas. Following the launching of an investigation, the company they worked for, Urban Moving Systems, suddenly shut down with its owners fleeing to Israel in a hurry.

While the Israelis were officially cleared of suspicion and deported before long, this episode has formed the primary basis for persistent theories about Israeli foreknowledge of, or even active involvement in, the largest terrorist attack in history — if true, it would obviously be of grave significance. The conspiracy has also forged the careers of a handful of Internet gadflies, most notably Ryan Dawson, who has been its most prolific popularizer through his many documentaries and interviews over the years.

This post will offer an alternative explanation for the so-called “Dancing Israelis” and will reassess the Mossad-9/11 theory as a whole, mainly structured around the claims Ryan makes in The Empire Unmasked. (Although very scattered, the film provides a popular record of the major claims.) It presents a more benign picture based on all the available evidence, from primary reporting of the incident to the 500-odd pages of the FBI’s own declassified files. It also corrects the innumerable lies told by Ryan and others, and puts forth indisputable proof of their dishonesty. Sources used among other resources will be collated at the very bottom of the page.

And speaking of innumerable lies and dishonesty, let’s not ignore the libertarian individuals (and allies) constantly mentioning this…

See the rest here…

ביידן הלך: “חוזרים לפעילות עצימה, וזקוקים לכם”

בנצי גופשטיין בפנייה אישית לציבור בעקבות הסרת הסנקציות מארצות הברית