The Agony of Reading Lefties

Here’s a nice long article with lots of pictures and picturesque descriptions about individuals “rewilding” Europe.

It’s hard to read, though.

For lefties, logic and economics are optional. So, it’s all about personal narratives, and the joy of “struggle” for Convivialism and against the supposed “Haves” (unless in government!), all while omitting the real words for Statist phenomena causing the ecological problem, like “the Precautionary Principle” and incentives problems (just like the FDA) and stuffing PC expressions of questionable explanatory power, such as “species loneliness”, and emoting “it feels like a form of ecocolonialism”.

Also, I think the Left forgot some of their own anti-establishment expressions ever since they took over so effectively, e.g., “Direct Action”, which is exactly what the activists described are doing.

Again, find it here to see what I mean.

‘Communism and Socialism Are Heresy!’ – Wait, Isn’t Observant\Charedi Politics ITSELF Socialist?!

Quoting Rabbi Moshe Taub, the Kaalover\Kaliver Rebbe on Ki Teitzei 5782:

Communist Socialism comes from heresy

“You shall not steal an employee who is poor or destitute”. (Devarim 24:14)

Who Is in Charge?

The students of the Maggid of Mezritch, zt”l, were once discussing how they would run the world if they were in Hashem’s place.

One student said that he would provide everyone in the world with riches, so that they could study Torah and perform mitzvos free of all distractions. Another student disagreed and said, that he would make everyone in the world poor, because wealth and affluence only distract a person from his true purpose.

The Baal HaTanya, zt”l, who was sitting among the students, answered: ” Since it is impossible to oversee this world better than Hashem, I would do everything exactly the same. Everything Hashem does is for the best. And, if we don’t see that goodness in something, that is our shortcoming.”

The Big Picture

The Chafeitz Chaim, zt”l, provided a powerful analogy:

A man was travelling and spent Shabbos in a particular town. When he went to shul, he noticed that the gabbai was calling up people for the aliyos from different areas in the shul. He called up the Kohen and Levi from the south, the Third aliyah from the east, the Fourth from the west, and the Fifth and Sixth aliyos from the north.

The visitor was puzzled and asked out loud: “Why does he call up these men from the south? Aren’t there respectable men in the east side of the congregation? And, why does he pick the Third Aliyah from the east and not the south? Why does he choose people based on where they are sitting?”

A congregant overheard these questions and answered: “With all due respect, this is your first Shabbos here and you want to know why the alyios are chosen in a particular order? If you were here for a few weeks, you would see that the gabbai uses this system to track who already had an Aliyah in previous weeks and invite others to have the opportunity.”

A person lives in this world for a brief window of time and he expects to understand how the world works? He wants answers to all his questions? He wants to know why one person is wealthy while another person is poor. Or he wants to understand why a poor person can do so much good in the world while a wealthy person does not.

If this person would live for hundreds of years, he would see that each person has exactly what they need to help them achieve their purpose for being here. There are souls placed in the bodies of the wealthy to experience that test. Then, those very same souls will revisit this world in the bodies of the poor to face that challenge as well.

Everything, everyone and every event that occurs in this world is with exactness, a Divine calculation from the Heavens. Nothing is haphazard. And, every detail is an element in a far larger plan in helping each soul obtain a tikkun, a level of rectification and perfection that can only be achieved through these trials, challenges and experiences.

If a person would live for thousands of years, he would start to gain perspective, to see the full scope of the Divine plan. However, for the brief time he is in this world, he is like a guest passing from place to place, unaware of why things happen a particular way. He doesn’t have the ability to question the way Hashem implements these Divine calculations. Rather, he needs to walk with Him purely, with emunah, faith, that everything Hashem does in this world is for the ultimate good of all.

The Dangers of “Isms”

The founders of Communism and Socialism were heretics. They denied Hashem’s Divine Providence, His Hashgacha Pratis. These philosophies didn’t view the world as the outcome of a precise Divine plan. Therefore, they felt that it was unjust for some people to be wealthy while others were in need. Their heresy drove them to cling to a false view of equality and they would forcefully take the possessions from the wealthy and redistribute it among the population.

These philosophies are rooted in the culture of Sedom. They also denied Hashgacha Pratis. The Gemara in Sanhedrin (109a) taught that when the people of Sodom discovered that someone was wealthy, they would deploy different tactics to try and find the treasure, take it, and divide it amongst themselves.

Lot, the nephew of Avraham Avinu, also believed in this philosophy. Therefore, he would graze his animals in the fields of the wealthy without their permission; taking what he felt was rightfully his from those who had more. When Avraham Avinu realized that Lot was following this viewpoint – which inevitably denies Hashem’s Hagasha Pratis – he asked Lot to separate himself and Lot went to live in Sedom where the entire culture was built upon this distorted perspective.

The core of these distorted philosophies, these schools of thought that deny Hashem’s oversight of this world, can still be found today. In nearly every country, there are segments of the population – and not necessarily small segments – who under the guise of false equality and justice, seek to forcefully take from the wealthy and redistribute that wealth free of punishment.

The Torah’s View

However, the Torah’s perspective on wealth and wealth distribution is vastly different. Everything a person has is provided by Hashem. Therefore, your possessions, your wealth, are rightfully yours just like the possessions of the poor are rightfully his.

Of course, a person should contribute a portion of his wealth willingly to fulfill the mitzvah of tzedakah. However, that is his choice, and he cannot be forced to do so. And, taking it without his permission is stealing just as it would be stealing to take the possessions of a poor person.

Hashem provides two very clear warnings in His Torah not to take from the wealthy forcefully to give to the poor. The first time is in Parsha Mishpatim where it says, Neither shall you glorify a poor man in his lawsuit (Shemos 23:3). Rashi explains: You shall not bestow honor upon him [the destitute man] by deciding in his favor in his lawsuit, saying, “He is a poor man; I will decide in his favor and honor him.”

The second time is in Parshas Kedoshim where it says, you shall not favor a poor person (Vayikra 19:15). Rashi explains: [This means] that you shall not say, “This man is poor, and the rich man is obligated to provide him with sustenance; therefore, I will acquit him in judgment, and he will thus be sustained respectably.”

This is the meaning of our pasuk. It says: “You shall not steal” even if you are “an employee who is poor or destitute”. Do not subscribe to the heretic philosophy and belief, that a poor person can forcefully take from those who seem to have more than him, because it’s an injustice to have more than others. You cannot steal from your employer who you might think isn’t compensating you enough. You need to remember that everything is from Hashem who watches over this world with Hashgacha Pratis, an exacting Divine Providence and intervention.

This kind of speech is almost considered a platitude (although less often heard these days).

So, how are we being gaslit so easily into voting and supporting the very isms opposed by the greats of old (Rabbi Elchanan Wasserman in “Ikvesa Demishicha”, Rabbi Chaim Soloveitchik, and many more figures by implication)?

מסר פרשת בלעם: עלינו לקיים רצון ה’ *גם אם אין* ציווי מפורש

שמעתי שהרחיב בכך הג”ר אלחנן וסרמן בס’ קוב”ש ח”ב סי’ י”ז-כ”ד (לא עיינתי בפנים), וכתב בסי’ כ”ד:

דכל מה שצוו חכמים אנו יודעין שכן הוא גם רצון ה’ ודבר זה לעשות רצונו ית”ש כל באי עולם מצווין ועומדין מתחלת ברייתן ע”ז דכל הנמצאים נבראו לעשות רצון קונם וכל פעל למענהו והא דקטן פטור מכל המצות הוא משום שכן הוא רצון ה’ לפוטרו אבל מכיון שגזרו חכמים עליו ואנו יודעין שהסכימה דעתן לדעת המקום ב”ה, ממילא חייב לעשות כדבריהן שכן הוא רצונו ית’.

ובזה אפשר לפרש כונת הכתוב בירמיה י”ט ובנו את במות הבעל לשרף את בניהם באש עלות לבעל אשר לא צויתי ולא דברתי ולא עלתה על לבי ע”כ ופירושו בתרגום דלא פקדית באוריתי ודלא שלחית ביד עבדיי נבייא ולא רעוא קדמי הני. בכתוב הזה מפורש כי יש שלשה חלקי תורה א הנקרא צווי ב הנקרא דבור ג שאין עליו לא צווי ולא דבור אלא רצון ד’ בלבד והם כל המצות דרבנן כנ”ל.

ולפי פשוטי המקראות נראה שזה היה עונו של בלעם הרשע דלכאורה אחרי שאמר אם יתן לי בלק מלא ביתו כסף וזהב לא אוכל לעבור את פי ה’ מה היא רשעתו אבל באמת אף שידע בלעם היטב כי הליכתו לקלל את ישראל הוא נגד רצון ה’ לא חשש ע”ז כ”ז שלא היה לו ציווי מפורש שלא לילך וע”כ אמר לא אוכל לעבור את פי ה’ פי דייקא אבל רצון ה’ לא היה חשוב בעיניו לעשותו וזוהי רשעותו.

Rabbi Natan Adler zatzal

Some years ago, back when it may have seemed I still had a fighting chance, a “friend” once cornered me and told me:

You will never become a great man since your rabbi is a weirdo!

First I had suicidal thoughts. But I quickly recovered and asked:

Do you even know who the Chasam Sofer’s rabbi was?!

Ha. Anyway, here’s a short book explaining the community leaders’ opposition to Rabbi Natan Adler zatzal here. It looks promising.

(Thanks to Kotzk Blog for the reference, but he relies far too much on academics here and elsewhere. For example, it is incorrect to say Rabbi Adler “left no writings”.)