קצר: בירור הלכתי בענין בחירת נשים למשרות ציבוריות
כולל תשובות מהגר”ח קניבסקי זצ”ל בענין מינוי נשים לדירקטוריון והשלכות על שאר מינויים ציבוריים, מאת הרב שמואל ברוך גנוט
התפרסם בטבת תשע”ה:
כולל תשובות מהגר”ח קניבסקי זצ”ל בענין מינוי נשים לדירקטוריון והשלכות על שאר מינויים ציבוריים, מאת הרב שמואל ברוך גנוט
התפרסם בטבת תשע”ה:
Hold your kippa\hat\whatever on the back of the window to create a reflective surface.
One thing that really struck me is how they manage to balance that critical approach with such a deep respect for tradition. It would be so easy to fall into cynicism, but they never do…
It’s like: “We stand on the shoulders of giants, but we have to keep looking forward”.
What’s so refreshing is, they believe that true understanding requires effort, and they respect their readers enough to challenge them.
Honesty. It’s how much they value intellectual honesty, they challenge everything, even deeply held beliefs.
And they always give reasons, evidence. They don’t just say stuff. They really do try to back up their claims, build a real argument, not just opinions.
Via NotebookLM’s AI-generated podcast. ChatGPT’s answers were far less impressive…
As George Bernard Shaw riffed on Artistotle, “Those who can, do; those who can’t, teach“. And there’s an addition (source unknown): “Those who can’t teach, teach teachers“.
As Rava comments in Yevamos 64b (great story):
On a similar note, Nassim Taleb says that survival comes before truth, understanding, or science. This is because, while science is not required for survival, survival is required to do science. (Not fully sure what that means, but it sounds clever.)