As we said before:
This alone indicates the Shabbos-Goy enemy was enabled by a traitor on the Israeli side. Although maybe using only this fact violates the “Affirming the Consequent” Fallacy.
Chananya Weissman eloquently argues —
The Mishna in Avoda Zara 70B states as follows:
בולשת שנכנסה לעיר בשעת שלום חביות פתוחות אסורות סתומות מותרות בשעת מלחמה אלו ואלו מותרות לפי שאין פנאי לנסך
If a [gentile] military force entered a city in peacetime, open wine barrels are forbidden [because we assume they poured the wine for idolatrous libations]; sealed barrels are permitted. During war, these and those are permitted, for there is no spare time to pour libations.
If there is no time during an invasion to splash some wine, there is certainly no time to take selfies, make videos, torture people to death, mutilate them, take smoking breaks, sit down for meals in people’s homes after murdering them, and walk around at a leisurely pace over many hours – when you know there are military bases with Apache helicopters within earshot and anyone can take a bus from anywhere in the country and arrive during all that time.
But Daniel Greenfield points out (at the end of his piece) that the attackers were on a fearless drug-fueled craze (Captogon), and so weren’t acting entirely rationally. I never tried that drug, and I don’t think he did, either.
(Wait, were they all drugged? Were they all told they had time? What about the Aza “civilians”?)
I think there is sufficient proof of Israeli treachery toward the Jews, either way. A real “Stab-in-the-back”! The question is why did it take “Our” side so long? Who told the evil Israeli “soldiers” and media to stand down, to wait, to say and do nothing?
Judging by how much food and weapons the attackers brought along, the traitors may have double-crossed Hamas, as well. Small comfort…
