העורך Editor
The Economic Sin of Adultery
Vayikra 18:20:
ואל אשת עמיתך לא תתן שכבתך לזרע לטמאה בה.
Why does the verse mention “seed”, and why “Amisecha”, unlike the other Arayos prohibitions (including the mention of adultery’s punishment itself elsewhere)?
I think the answer is simple. In case the adultery produces results, it is also a grievous sin against your fellow man who will give his time and money and food and patrimony to one who isn’t his own lawful heir.
Regarding Yehuda Meshi Zahav’s ‘Open Letter’
Yehuda Meshi Zahav wrote an “Open Letter” to his deceased uncle, Rabbi Amram Blau, praising the state of Israel, disagreeing with the “divisiveness” his approach engendered, and rejoicing Rabbi Blau‘s concerns have become moot.
I don’t agree with either of them, because Rabbi Blau wasn’t against the state itself, either (UPDATE: I was wrong about that, see the above link).
Now, I was discouraged by several advisors from launching a scathing attack on Meshi, but I do wish to note one very simple point: The State isn’t us! When private individuals in the Holy Land do wonderful things, this doesn’t indicate anything about the State of Jezreel at all.
P.S., This all seems so ironic now…
Tomorrow: Rabbi Sirota Against Israeli Independence Day
Whatever happened to our natural disgust for the Israeli state?!
(Also: Who needs monopoly quality and prices of everything important?)
Q&A About the Euthyphro Dilemma (Rewritten)
How do we understand the following statement of Avraham Avinu: השופט כל-הארץ, לא יעשה משפט? Isn’t Hashem the cause and source of the definition of משפט, and/or of how He is “supposed” to run the world?
Second, as loyal Jews, we need to focus on our practical obligations (including the mitzvos of thought), and not the “Truth”. This may well be the kind of question Mishna Chagigah 2:1 forbids contemplating. As the saying in Yeshiva goes: “One does not die from a difficulty”.
Although the mind cannot escape certain conundrums, one must axiomatically admit the alternate half of the paradox that will best enable observance of all other mitzvos, as these paradoxes occur to us. (Rabbi Nachman of Breslov would apply here the Kabbalistic idea of “Mati velo mati”.)
For example, as regards Rambam Hilchos Teshuvah 5:5, one should ordinarily accept the outlook humanity has perfectly free will (sort of). As regards the Euthyphro dilemma, one should usually accept Hashem created ethics (so it is only “arbitrary” for Him), and interpret sources such as Avraham’s prayer for Sedom accordingly. Similarly, one should generally assume Hashem wrote the Torah (although certain syllogisms and sources imply the Torah has existed since forever, instead). And so on.
(For a related discussion, check out the “Practical Guide to Speaking with an Atheist“.)