Rabbi Avi Grossman: The Thirteenth Knock

Rabbi Grossman comments on yesterday’s article:

The thirteenth knock is the one that the mizrachi establishment, as exemplified by the YU rabbis, wants to keep hidden. It is the awakening of the younger generation to the fact that the Torah, and the entire Torah, was given to us in order to be put into practice. That is it insufficient to just study Talmud, and that we have to settle the land of Israel and strive to seek out the place of the Temple in order to rebuild it.

Https://mizrachi.org/ publication after publication, event after event, speech after speech, but nothing ever about even fostering a yearning to visit the temple! But the youngsters know better, thank God.

re: Rabbi Yitzchak Yosef’s Proclamation Against Saying ‘Shema Yisrael’ in a Mosque

Rabbi Avi Grossman writes:

Aside from the deeply scandalous and heretical claim of the so-called Chief Rabbi that we respect other religions and their places of worship, such that the soldiers who used the Jenin mosque’s PA system for qabbalath ‘ol malchuth shamayim should be disciplined, it is even more so insulting to our intelligence: yes the place was built for “worship”, but in practice it was used as a base for their paramilitary organization, just like the vast majority of their ostensible places of worship.

 

Rabbi Avi Grossman: Elections Should Be Free and Infrequent

The marriage mashal:

Choosing a partner could very well be the most important decision in life, and it may (hopefully) last for life. Therefore, one should not approach such a decision with the knowledge that, for example, every five years he will have a chance to change his decision, or that, perhaps, even if he chose to stick with her for another five years, after ten years, he must find another, because that will detract from the gravity of all of his life decisions, even if ending the marriage is warranted in extreme cases.

So too with a nation. A democratic and fair process should be employed to ascertain who should rule since such a decision is the most critical in the life of the nation. But it should be infrequent, with the condition in mind that it is meant for the long haul, and not to be regularly re-evaluated and likely changed every few years.

The democratic aspect of the initial election is required by the halacha. The Sages said in B’rachoth:

“אמר רבי יצחק: אין מעמידין פרנס על הצבור אלא אם כן נמלכים בצבור, שנאמר “ראו קרא ה’ בשם בצלאל” (שמות לה, ל). אמר לו הקדוש ברוך הוא למשה: משה, הגון עליך בצלאל? אמר לו: רבונו של עולם אם לפניך הגון, לפני לא כל שכן? אמר לו: אף על פי כן לך אמור להם. הלך ואמר להם לישראל: הגון עליכם בצלאל? אמרו לו אם לפני הקדוש ברוך הוא ולפניך הוא הגון, לפנינו לא כל שכן?”

And: אין מעמידין מלך אלא על פי בית דין של שבעים ואחד, the Sanhedrin being the representative body of the community.

Thus, we find that it was the elders of the people who asked for Saul, and who had to make the decision to accept him as king, and likewise with David, who despite being chosen by God, had to get the support of the elders of the nation in order to actually rule, and this explains why even though the right to rule is hereditary, Rehoboam had to go through a process of election and acceptance by the people when his time came.

This also explains how many times the new king was put in place “by the people.” (E.g., Omri, Jehoash, Amaziah, Josiah, Jehoahaz, etc.)

Rabbi Grossman Re: ‘Ever Min Hachai’

For Jews, please it is permissible to eat fish while  they are still alive, as long as they have been pulled from the water, and I would argue that Maimonides held the same standard for gentiles, so I would be reluctant to brand such a practice as cruel, even if we do find other examples of gentiles eating אבר מן החי.

re: Sure, Rabbi Hershel Schachter Opposes Ascending the Temple Mount…

Rabbi Avi Grossman writes (regarding Rabbi Schachter’s opposition to Jews ascending the Temple Mount):

“But why does the Rabbanut prohibit?”

That is what Rabbi Hershel Schachter should have asked next.

And the answer is that the Rabbanut prohibits because of a combination of politic considerations (i.e. non halachic considerations) and a misguided sense of piety brought about by the exilic mindset: we are not allowed to do anything we haven’t done of late, and that’s the way God wants it.
Both approaches are invalid.