הרב אבי גרוסמן Rabbi Avi Grossman
Rabbi Avi Grossman Defends the Temple Mount Youth
Concerning Rabbi Neiger’s claim here:
re: Bald Monkeys Aren’t ‘Nazirites’
Regarding yesterday’s remark that bald monkeys aren’t “Nazirites” (נזירים)! — secular Hebrew to the contrary notwithstanding.
Rabbi Avi Grossman writes in:
Adderebba.
Not only is it clear that the Hebrew nazir is one who abstains from wine and grape juice (״מיין ושכר יזיר״) nothing like the Christian concept of an ascetic monk, our nazirim did not take on the ridiculous, unnatural, and perverse practice of celibacy, and more importantly, just like the word for abstention, yazzir, is of the root nun-zayin-reish in the hif’il conjugation, the simple segolate-noun form of the word, neizer, a type of crown, is specifically referring to the nazirite’s long hair. Intentionally removing all of the hair of one’s head is the opposite of being a nazirite.
(Avoiding contact with the dead is not referred to with the same term, and is instead referred to as it is with regard to priests – avoidance of ritual contamination. See also my earlier essay about how nazirisim is basically a means of opening the priesthood and its attendant higher sanctity to those who are disqualified from the actual priesthood.)
re: Asset Forfeiture in Israel
In reference to yesterday’s article, Rabbi Avi Grossman writes:
“I had a similar incident whereby the police forcefully seized a large sum of money from a neighbor.
Considering the claimant was looking for about 2,000 NIS, the police must have kept the other 2,900 NIS for themselves.”
Maimonides’s Code: The Temple Mount is THE Temple!
Rabbi Avi Grossman, in response to Rabbi Brand’s series of proofs השם ‘מקדש’ כולל את הר הבית:
Rabbi Brand does not need to bring examples about how the Temple Mount is THE Temple; Maimonides’s code is just so chock full of them:
ו,א המקדש כולו לא היה במישור, אלא במעלה ההר: כשאדם נכנס משער מזרחי של הר הבית, מהלך עד סוף החיל בשווה; ועולה מן החיל לעזרת הנשים בשתים עשרה מעלות, רום כל מעלה חצי אמה ושלחה חצי אמה.Here he describes the various ascensions in the Temple, and notice he’s talking about the topography of the mount.ז,ו [ז] אף על פי שהמקדש היום חרב בעוונותינו, חייב אדם במוראו כמו שהיה נוהג בו בבניינו — לא ייכנס אלא למקום שמותר להיכנס לשם, ולא יישב בעזרה, ולא יקל ראשו כנגד שער המזרח: שנאמר “את שבתותיי תשמורו, ומקדשי תיראו” (ויקרא יט,ל; ויקרא כו,ב) — מה שמירת שבת לעולם, אף מורא מקדש לעולם, שאף על פי שחרב, בקדושתו עומד.And here he describes how one should only enter the areas of the miqdash (even today) which are permitted to him, i.e. The Temple Mount up until the hel.The distinction is made right at the beginning of the halachot: the entire Mount is the Temple, except that everything from the inner courtyard and inward is the “iqqar,” i.e. the barest minimum as it was in the Tabernacle.In a forthcoming article I offer that even at Shiloh and Nov, there were additional structures and areas adjacent to the Tabernacle courtyard that served the Tabernacle.