Ron Paul on Trump’s Plan To Cut Half the Offense Budget

Can We Really Cut Half of the Military Budget? You Bet!

02/18/2025

The wailing sound you heard last Thursday was the chorus of the Beltway warmongers shrieking in despair at President Trump’s suggestion that there was no reason for the United States to be spending one trillion dollars on “defense.”

“…[O]ne of the first meetings I want to have is with President Xi of China and President Putin of Russia, and I want to say let’s cut our military budget in half. And we can do that, and I think we’ll be able to do that,” the President told reporters.

With this statement, President Trump blew up one of the biggest myths of our time, particularly among Republicans, that spending more on the military is essential to keeping us safe. There is a vast and well-funded network of political and industrial interests that depend on maintaining that myth, from the weapons manufacturers to the mainstream media to the think tanks and beyond. Why? Because most of what is called “defense spending” has little to do with defending this country and a lot to do with enriching the politically well-connected.

Maintaining that global military empire has bankrupted the United States while making us less safe and less free. President Trump seems to understand this. But the military-industrial complex and its cheerleaders have for decades pushed the idea that we could not survive without continuously increasing their budgets.

Thanks to the work of the “Department of Government Efficiency” we are learning that much of what has been sold as “essential spending” is nothing of the sort. Take USAID, for example. We were led to believe that this agency was feeding the poor while promoting the best kind of American values overseas. Thanks to DOGE, we learned that the money was going to absurdities like funding transgender puppet shows in Peru.

We are also learning that a great deal of USAID money was going to actually overthrow democratic governments overseas – as well as manipulate foreign media and promote censorship of “dissident” voices at home and abroad. Not only was USAID not helping countries overseas – it was actually harming them!

Just as with USAID, when we are able to see just where that one trillion military budget is going Americans are going to fully realize that they have been lied to for decades. That is why we need a full audit of the Pentagon and full transparency of the results.

We also need a change in policy. Americans are beginning to understand the economic costs of maintaining a global military empire. US taxpayers are forced to cover more than half of the entire NATO budget while European countries rattle sabers at Russia and threaten war. If Europe feels so threatened by Russia, why don’t they cover the costs of their own defense? Why do poor Americans have to pay for the defense of rich Europeans? Haven’t we had enough of this?

I very much hope that President Trump follows through with his plan to drastically reduce our bloated military budget. We can start by closing the hundreds of military bases overseas, bringing back our troops from foreign countries, and eliminating our massive commitments to NATO and other international organizations.

We will be richer, safer, and happier.

From Mises.org, here.

Babylon Bee on the Trumpian Aza Plan…

Feb 5, 2025

WASHINGTON, D.C. — President Trump has announced that America will try a brand new, never-before-tried strategy of taking over a country in the Middle East.

Pundits across the political spectrum hailed the totally innovative idea, confident that the plan will work out to perfection with no issues whatsoever.

“I don’t know why no one has ever thought of this before. It’s so smart and so simple,” explained President Trump. “Everyone will be so happy to have America in Gaza, they love us there. We will build a big, beautiful nation in no time, there will be so much democracy and freedom, no one will believe it.”

The plan’s utter brilliance left the crowd stunned, completely overcome with awe. “How has no one tried this before?” wondered Middle East historian Daniel Bingham. “The solution, glorious in its simplicity, has been staring us in the face this entire time. America simply takes over part of the Middle East and runs it! I cannot wait to see how beautifully this works out.”

At publishing time, Trump had announced that he would appoint George W. Bush as strategic coordinator to carry out his amazing new plan.

From Babylon Bee, here.

The Macro-Econ Con Job

Essay January 20, 2025

Politicians and economists promise higher standards of living. Are there reliable, objective measures to help determine when their policies are achieving this goal?

At present, most analyses of the question draw primarily on aggregate numbers computed regularly in every country, offered with little commentary on their reliability, either conceptual or in measurement. The numbers draw on a roughly century-old academic field of computing national statistics and a field of study called “macroeconomics.” Economists largely initiated this global record-keeping. However, the various government departments and international institutions that compute the numbers rarely comment on key factors that are highly relevant to understanding their significance.

As economists have sharply and repeatedly pointed out, these statistics can mean very different things in countries with more centralized or decentralized decision-making. It is highly misleading to compare statistics originating from centralized countries to decentralized ones. This is especially important because governments can use these national aggregate statistics and models to rationalize bad policy, raising false hopes for improvements in living standards that are unlikely to materialize.

In many ways, the entire “macroeconomic sector” is comparable to the astrology that guided people’s decisions centuries ago. In a future essay, I will discuss alternative data—objective ones, alluded in this essay’s very last paragraph—that governments can rely upon if their goal is to raise standards of living, rather than staying in power and controlling the economy. Perhaps the timing is right, and the DOGE can start getting rid of macro-mythology and institutions based on it. That would be a huge win for good government, and for human prosperity more generally.

Continue reading…

From Law&Liberty, here.

שיר ‘שבעת התנאים’ ע”פ ספר חובת הלבבות

מבית ארגון “השגחה פרטית”…

שירה: ר’ הערשל שכטר. עיבוד: ר’ יעקב כהן

מילים של השיר
שבעת התנאים של בעל חובות הלבבות

בֹּקֶר טוֹב בְּנִי הַיָּקָר
אֲנִי רוֹצֶה שֶׁיִּהְיֶה לְךָ
יוֹם שֶׁל מְנוּחָה,
יוֹם שֶׁל שַׁלְוָה,

קַח אִתְּךָ צֵידָה לַדֶּרֶךְ,
שִׁבְעָה יְסוֹדוֹת,
שֶׁכָּתַב בַּעַל חוֹבוֹת הַלְּבָבוֹת
בְּשַׁעַר הַבִּטָּחוֹן:

הָרִאשׁוֹן
אֲנִי מְרַחֵם עָלֶיךָ
יוֹתֵר מִכָּל מְרַחֵם
אָבִינוּ, אָב הָרַחֲמָן.

הַשֵּׁנִי
לֹא יֵעָלֵם מִמֶּנִּי
מַה שֶׁטּוֹב לְךָ
בַּנִּסְתָּר בַּנִּרְאֶה,
בָּזֶה וּבַבָּא.

הַשְּׁלִישִׁי
אֲנִי חָזָק
יוֹתֵר מִכָּל חָזָק,
כֹּל אֲשֶׁר חָפֵץ ה’
עָשָׂה.

הָרְבִיעִי
אֲנִי מַשְׁגִּיחַ
עַל הַנְהָגַת בְּנֵי אָדָם כֻּלָּם
לֹא יִתְעַלֵּם
מִמֶּנִּי דָּבָר.

הַחֲמִישִׁי
שֶׁאֵין בְּיָד אֶחָד
מֵהַבְּרוּאִים
לְהוֹעִיל וּלְהַזִּיק
כִּי אִם בִּרְשׁוּתִי
כִּי אִם בִּרְשׁוּת הַבּוֹרֵא.

הַשִּׁשִּׁי
תֵּדַע,
רַב טוּבִי עָלֶיךָ,
אֲפִלּוּ, אִם אֵינְךָ רָאוּי לְכָךְ.

הַשְּׁבִיעִי
הֲלִיכוֹתָיו
נֶעֱלָמוֹת וַעֲמֻקּוֹת
גָּבוֹהַּ מֵעַל גָּבוֹהַּ
אִי אֶפְשָׁר לְהוֹסִיף אוֹ לִגְרֹעַ
לֹא לְהַקְדִּים
וְלֹא לְאַחֵר
עַל מָה שֶׁגָּזַר
הַבּוֹרֵא יִתְבָּרַךְ שְׁמוֹ.