Warsaw Ghetto Uprising: Finally Asking the Right Questions

7/30/22 – Shiur 381 – The Warsaw Ghetto – The Uprising: Was it Halachically sanctioned?

July 29, 2022

The history of the ghetto
Is it a form of Kiddush Hashem to go down fighting rather than getting killed passively?
Are you allowed to resist when you technically won’t win: Is it a form of suicide?
Are you causing others to get killed?
The controversy surrounding Reb Menachem Zemba’s view
Are leaders obligated not to abandon their flock or do they have to leave to save their lives?

with Yehuda Geberer – Jewish Historian and Tour Guide, Jewish History Soundbites – 19:55
with Rabbi Reuven Brand – Rosh Kollel, YU Torah Mitzion Kollel, Chicago Illinois – 38:27
with Rabbi Daniel Yaakov Glatstein – Rov in Cedarhurst, Noted Speaker, Grandson of Reb Menachem Zemba’s lookout in the uprising – 1:02:22

Continue reading…

From Headlines in Halacha, here.

Em Habanim Semeha: Restoration of Zion As a Response During the Holocaust, edited and translated by Rabbi Dr. Pesach Schindler

Literature of the 3 weeks and the Shoah

Posted 

Midway through the month of Tammuz our religious focus shifts to observances commemorating the saddest events in our history. The destruction of the two temples, the murders and massacres of centuries past, and the hateful actions that fill our daily news feeds are given special attention at this time of year.

“Em Habanim Semeha: Restoration of Zion As a Response During the Holocaust,” by Rabbi Yisachar Shlomo Teichtal, edited and translated by Rabbi Dr. Pesach Schindler, emerges as a premier literary work of the Holocaust era. Teichtal, a chassidic rabbi, was a fervent adherent of a rabid anti-Zionist ideology. During the last years of the Holocaust, as its horrors enveloped his community and ultimately consumed him as well, he openly repudiated his anti-Zionist beliefs and committed his feelings into writings, which evolved into “Eim HaBanim Semeha.”

The book was hidden before Rabbi Teichtal was deported. After the war, it was brought to Israel and printed in Hebrew. Based on classical Jewish sources, the author tries to find meaning in the tragedy unfolding around him. He began to see the galus as the prime source of all the troubles. He regarded aliyah to Israel as the rectifying force, which did not happen because of the widespread anti-Zionist stand of most of the chassidic leadership in Europe during the inter-war years.

In addition to strong theological arguments for the settlement of Israel, Rabbi Teichtal condemns his fellow chassidic rabbis. He directly blames them for the large Jewish presence that remained in East Europe on the eve of World War II.

In 1999 “Eim HaBanim Semeha” was translated into English by Rabbi Dr. Pesach Schindler of Hebrew University in Jerusalem, one of the most distinguished scholars of both the Holocaust era and the chassidic community under Nazi rule. What makes Rabbi Schindler’s work unique is that he does not treat it as a literal translation, but as a learning experience. He translates the most important sections of the book together with detailed footnotes that are designed to be informative and allow the reader to conduct further research. Additionally, the print, type style, and format make it a very user-friendly volume.

Rabbi Schindler, in paraphrasing Rabbi Teichtal’s original work, has edited the book to make it readable for both the expert and the layperson.

In his eloquent and informative introduction to the book, Rabbi Walter Wurzburger, the former rabbi of Shaaray Tefila in Lawrence and a close friend of Dr. Schindler, noted the value of the editor’s introduction to the work. “It enables even readers unfamiliar with the historic background to appreciate the momentous nature of Rabbi Teichtal’s ‘conversion’ from radical anti-Zionism to a passionate advocacy of religious Zionism,” he says.

Rabbi Wurzburger further notes that one major technical flaw in the original volume is that because of its hasty composition under trying conditions, some of the language assumes that the reader has a firm base in the works cited. Thus, notes Rabbi Wurzburger, “even individuals who can read the Hebrew original will derive much benefit from Dr. Schindler’s excellent notes and commentary. With the tools of scholarship at his disposal, he is able to illuminate what would otherwise have remained obscure to those who cannot match his [Rabbi Teichtal’s] extensive knowledge of Talmudic and chassidic literature.”

This is a very delicate topic, sensitive to some who have refused to acknowledge past misjudgments. Rabbi Dr. Schindler’s treatment of this text reflects a keen sensitivity to the issue at hand. I highly recommend it.

Originally published July 16, 2008

Even so-called ATHEISTS Distrust Other Atheists…

In Atheists We Distrust

Subjects believe that people behave better when they think that God is watching over them

By Daisy Grewal on January 17, 2012

Atheists are one of the most disliked groups in America. Only 45 percent of Americans say they would vote for a qualified atheist presidential candidate, and atheists are rated as the least desirable group for a potential son-in-law or daughter-in-law to belong to. Will Gervais at the University of British Columbia recently published a set of studies looking at why atheists are so disliked. His conclusion: It comes down to trust.

Gervais and his colleagues presented participants with a story about a person who accidentally hits a parked car and then fails to leave behind valid insurance information for the other driver. Participants were asked to choose the probability that the person in question was a Christian, a Muslim, a rapist, or an atheist. They thought it equally probable the culprit was an atheist or a rapist, and unlikely the person was a Muslim or Christian. In a different study, Gervais looked at how atheism influences people’s hiring decisions. People were asked to choose between an atheist or a religious candidate for a job requiring either a high or low degree of trust. For the high-trust job of daycare worker, people were more likely to prefer the religious candidate. For the job of waitress, which requires less trust, the atheists fared much better.

It wasn’t just the highly religious participants who expressed a distrust of atheists. People identifying themselves as having no religious affiliation held similar opinions. Gervais and his colleagues discovered that people distrust atheists because of the belief that people behave better when they think that God is watching over them. This belief may have some truth to it. Gervais and his colleague Ara Norenzayan have found that reminding people about God’s presence has the same effect as telling people they are being watched by others: it increases their feelings of self-consciousness and leads them to behave in more socially acceptable ways.

When we know that somebody believes in the possibility of divine punishment, we seem to assume they are less likely to do something unethical. Based on this logic, Gervais and Norenzayan hypothesized that reminding people about the existence of secular authority figures, such as policemen and judges, might alleviate people’s prejudice towards atheists. In one study, they had people watch either a travel video or a video of a police chief giving an end-of-the-year report. They then asked participants how much they agreed with certain statements about atheists (e.g., “I would be uncomfortable with an atheist teaching my child.”) In addition, they measured participants’ prejudice towards other groups, including Muslims and Jewish people. Their results showed that viewing the video of the police chief resulted in less distrust towards atheists. However, it had no effect on people’s prejudice towards other groups. From a psychological standpoint, God and secular authority figures may be somewhat interchangeable. The existence of either helps us feel more trusting of others.

Continue reading…

From Scientific American, here.