PRICELESS: Scott Horton Indicts Bill Kristol and His War Against Mankind

Bill Kristol and Scott Horton Debate U.S. Interventionism

Oct 8, 2021

A leading proponent of the invasion of Iraq vs. the editorial director of Antiwar.com.
——————
Subscribe to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/ReasonTV?sub_…
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason.Magaz…
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/reason

Reason is the planet’s leading source of news, politics, and culture from a libertarian perspective. Go to reason.com for a point of view you won’t get from legacy media and old left-right opinion magazines.
—————-
On October 4, 2021, Bill Kristol, an editor at large of The Bulwark, went up against Scott Horton of the Libertarian Institute in an Oxford-style debate on U.S. foreign policy at Symphony Space in New York City.

Kristol was a leading proponent of the invasion of Iraq, the founding editor of The Weekly Standard, a foreign policy adviser to John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign, and chief of staff to Vice President Dan Quayle.

Scott Horton is the author of Enough Already: Time to End the War on Terrorism and Fool’s Errand: Time to End the War in Afghanistan. He’s the editorial director of Antiwar.com and the host of Antiwar Radio and the Scott Horton Show.

The debate was hosted by The Soho Forum, with Director Gene Epstein moderating.

Narrated by Nick Gillespie; production by Four Corners Media; intro edited by John Osterhoudt

Photos: Brett Raney; Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

From YouTube, here.

Hebrew Isn’t Lashon Hakodesh? But Then, Neither Is Lashon Chazal!

Hebrew or לשון הקודש?

Parshas Hashavua Noach

‘שפה אחת בראשית י”א א
וחד אמר שהיו מדברים בלשון יחידו של עולם -בלשון הקודש—-
ירשלמי מגילה פ”א ה”ט

The חתם סופר writes that לשון הקדש is limited to only those words appearing in תנ”ך. All other words even those used by חז”ל in the Mishna etc. is not considered לשון הקדש.

Unlike other languages, new words that were added years later are still considered as the original language.

The Frankfurt Oder* Shas has on the last page of מס’ נדה printed the following,

נעשה סדור אותיות ע”י המסדר ישראל

וע”י אחותו הבתולה געלא בת כהר”ר משה שליט”א

בשנת נקבה סובב זכר לפ”ק תנ”ד **

In one of the early printed Seforim the following declaration is printed “I, Estellina, the wife of my worthy husband Abraham Conat wrote this Sefer בחינת עולם”

This Sefer was actually written by ידעיה הבדרשי, not by Estellina. What she actually meant was she printed it.

When printing was still in its infancy there was no uniform word in לשון הקודש (Hebrew) for the words “print, printed, printer etc.”

Many used the term כתיבה (writing)***. Others termed it מחוקק (engraving). Some termed it העתק (copy). Some used the word סידור אותיות (organizing the letters.

Eventually, the word דפוס (form) became the standard translation for print.

Continue reading…

From Toras Aba, here.

Can You EVER Trust the Establishment These Days?

People Notice When the Elites Lie

October 7, 2021

I’m going to try to explain what’s going on in America right now by drawing a connection between two news stories.  On the surface, they don’t seem to have much to do with each other, but when you really think about them, it’s obvious that there’s a common thread.

The first story comes from way back in November of 2018, when President Trump complained about an “Obama judge” on the Ninth Circuit ruling against his asylum policy.  Trump’s comments angered Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court, who gave a speech saying:

We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges.  What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them.  That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.

Trump responded by tweeting: “Sorry Chief Justice John Roberts, but you do indeed have ‘Obama judges,’ and they have a much different point of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country….”

For the Deep State and its sympathizers, Roberts’s statement was a dignified and erudite defense of the institutions of liberal democracy, while Trump’s tweet was a crass attack on said institutions.

Ordinary Americans, who aren’t emotionally invested in keeping up the illusion that all is well on the banks of the Potomac, saw something different.  They saw John Roberts telling a lie and Donald Trump telling the truth.

Everybody knows that most of what the upper level of the judicial system does is politics by another name.  They know that most of the time, Obama judges, Trump judges, Bush judges, and Clinton judges rule differently on politically charged questions.  And a large portion of the American people decide whom to vote for in presidential elections based mainly on what kinds of judges they want the next president to appoint.

John Roberts has the audacity to tell these people that none of this is true and that all judges are really just doing their best to enforce the same laws in an impartial way.

And then, right after this creature of the Deep State (not even a Democrat, but a moderate Republican) has told his lie, Donald Trump does what most politicians won’t do (including Republicans) and tells the truth.

Over the next few years, when Trump’s base continues to believe Trump’s statements in preference to those of the media, the regulatory agencies, Anthony Fauci, the “moderates” in Congress, or whomever, the elite classes and the plutocrats and the mainstream press continue to act surprised, as if there were no reason for anybody to take Trump’s word over theirs about illegal immigration, or the origin of the coronavirus, or hydroxychloroquine, or election fraud.

Except there was a reason why the Deplorables listened to Trump instead of the mainstream voices.  It is that the mainstream voices have been lying to them for a long, long time, without even trying to be subtle.  Eventually, the Deplorables noticed, and they decided to trust someone else.

Continue reading…

From American Thinker, here.

Language Matters – How to Communicate with Doctors

Know Your Rights: “Refused” Versus “Declined”

There are medical and legal implications between the words “Refused” and “Declined”.

Short instructional video from Doc Schmidt on TikTok

And nurses, PAs, doctors will write what they wish to portray into your medical records. Make sure they get it right. Demand a copy, as is your legal right, of all and complete medical records, doctor’s/nurse’s notes, etc.

Doctors, nurses, PAs, and all the medical establishment are not our friends. They are good for ONE thing: trauma and emergency care.

I have always used the term “Decline” and say “I am cooperating, but I object to …” Also, “I do not consent.”

This applies to any situation where you encounter an agent of the state: medical personnel, a cop, a school teacher, a judge. You have the right to decline, not give your consent, to protect your body, your person, your family, your dog, your home, your auto, your property.

Just say No! to the state and do not let them intimidate you and make you out to be the aggressor. Stay calm and repeat.

And do it with a smile. That drives them bonkers.

Remember THEY all work for YOU!!!

From LRC, here.

Rabbinate ‘Kashrut’ Satire

Rabbinate Kashrut Supervisors Glad COVID Hasn’t Hampered Grueling Schedule Of Not Inspecting Restaurants

 “I haven’t relaxed my standards: I still check that the money has been deposited in my bank before I sign the new certificate.”

Jerusalem, September 9 – Members of the capital city’s official religious establishment voiced relief today, following months of economic instability, that they have found their task of failing to visit the culinary establishments with whom they have contracted to certify as following Jewish dietary law unimpeded despite the ravages of the coronavirus pandemic.

Jerusalem Rabbinate personnel in the kashrut division told reporters Wednesday that the lockown and social distancing measures in place to prevent or slow the spread of COVID-19, including various restrictions on the restaurants and prepared-food establishments under their supervision, have not prevented them from adhering to their routine of not conducting the on-site inspections their agreements require them to perform, and in fact, reported several such inspectors, the limited operations of numerous such establishments under the current regulations have allowed the supervisors to add even more restaurants and fast-food vendors to the roster of places they neglect to visit in any effective manner.

The mashgichim, Hebrew for overseers, carry exclusive legal authority to determine whether a food establishment may declare itself kosher, under a law that empowers them to enforce that aspect of consumer protection from fraud. Such arrangements typically specify an expected minimum number of visits by the mashgiach in a given period, and include payment by the establishment of a monthly salary to the inspector – regardless of whether he shows up, or how often. Ministry of Health regulations aimed at impeding the spread of the coronavirus pathogen caused many mashgichim to fear for the integrity of their not-conducting-inspection schedules, explained one enthusiastic Rabbinate mashgiach, but in the end enough food businesses under their jurisdiction have survived, allowing the inspectors to continue drawing those salaries.

“It’s been a lifeline during this uncertain time,” admitted Rabbi Niggud Inyanim. “My chief concern was that the various restrictions affecting my neighborhood would mean I couldn’t keep to my routine of not inspecting the dozens of establishments on my list, and then just mailing them their certificate when the three-month inspection period renewed. I’m proud to say that I haven’t relaxed my standards even a little: I still check carefully that the money has been deposited in my bank before I even consider signing, stamping, and sending the new certificate in the name of the Chief Rabbis of the city. Sometimes I even check more than once, just to be sure.”

A colleague of his, who declined to be identified for this article, expressed sentiments that others interviewed also acknowledged: concern that if and when the ministry lifts restrictions, the inspectors will be expected to make actual appearances at the venues they supervise.

From PreOccupied Territory, here.