Alan Dershowitz: ‘If Everybody’s a Racist, Then NOBODY’S a Racist’

‘Being black doesn’t give you license to call everyone racist’

Prominent American jurist Alan Dershowitz slams Democratic congresswoman Maxine Waters after she accuses him of racism.

David Rosenberg , Aug 08 , 2017 12:17 PM

Prominent American jurist and defense attorney Alan Dershowitz blasted Democratic Congresswoman Maxine Waters (CA-43rd District) this week, after Waters accused Dershowitz of racism over his commentary on a recent move by Special Counsel Robert Mueller in the ongoing investigation of President Trump’s 2016 campaign.

After Mueller impaneled a grand jury in Washington DC as part of the investigation against the Trump campaign, Dershowitz told WABC Radio last Friday that the selection of DC “might be very unfavorable to the Trump administration,” noting that the District has consistently voted “solidly Democrat”, due in part to its “ethnic and racial composition”.

Over the weekend, Waters accused Dershowitz of racism.

“What he’s simply saying is: ‘You know all of those black people are there and they don’t like Trump and so he’s not gonna get a fair trial and so they should take it out of that jurisdiction’,” Waters told MSNBC.

“I don’t like that, and I’m surprised Alan Dershowitz is talking like that and we will not stand for it, we will push back against that, because that is absolutely racist.”

Dershowitz, a life-long Democrat who backed Hillary Clinton in 2016, pushed back on Sunday, calling Waters’ accusation outrageous, adding the congresswoman “ought to be ashamed of herself.”

“Being black doesn’t give you a license to call people racist any more than being Jewish gives you a license to call people anti-Semitic.”

On Tuesday, Dershowitz appeared on Fox News to challenge Waters over her accusations.

“She tosses around that term [racism] so promiscuously that it dilutes the term. She hurts her own cause because she’s crying wolf. If everybody’s a racist, than nobody’s a racist. If I’m a racist, then what is she gonna call real racists? I marched in the South, I was involved in the Civil Rights Movement all of my life.”

Dershowitz went on to call his original comments “utterly uncontroversial”.

“There isn’t a criminal lawyer – prosecutor or defense attorney – who would disagree with the statement that Mueller got an advantage by moving the case to the District of Columbia, that he has a better chance of getting a favorable jury pool in the District of Columbia than he would in Virginia.”

Washington DC, which is approximately 50% African American – a traditionally Democratic demographic group – went for Hillary Clinton in 2016 by an 86.4% margin, with Trump winning just 4.1% of the vote, a record low for the Republican Party.

From Arutz Sheva, here.

Observant Jewry’s ‘Fiscus Judaicus’ Goes to Israeli Temples of Sin – Yet They’re the Parasites?!

In an election period, attacking the haredi orthodox community yields political gains, but the figures show the attacks are off the mark.

Elections again. Ho-hum.In addition to pandemic fatigue, Israelis are contending with election fatigue, triggered by the unheard-of phenomenon of four national elections within the space of two years. As dutiful Israelis, we’ll once again dredge up our national concerns for contemplation, in the hopes of finding a candidate who represents our ideals.

With at least two party leaders, Yair Lapid and Avigdor Liberman, pledging to change the haredi status quo as part of their election rhetoric, the topic of haredim and their place in Israeli society is taking center stage once again.

What is it about Haredim that interests Israelis politically more than, say, security or the housing crisis? Well, exemption from army service is without a doubt a top issue. And many blame haredim for spreading Covid-19. But if you follow the extensive media coverage of haredim, you’ll notice that lack of contribution to the Israeli economy and manipulation of the national budget are an even greater source of contention for many citizens. As Liberman posted recently in Facebook: “On the day that Balfour ceases to be Deri, Gafni, and Litzman’s bank account, that is the day we can point to as the beginning of the Israeli economy’s recovery.”

Since I’m skeptical of populist statements, especially prior to elections, I decided to research the topic. I wanted to know: how accurate is the accusation against haredim of economic parasitism?

Most haredim work

“Haredim don’t pay taxes” is a refrain I hear fairly often. While some people erroneously believe that haredim managed to finagle a community-wide tax exemption, most faultfinders are simply referring to low haredi employment rates. No salary equals no taxes.

According to the Haredi Institute for Public Affairs, on the basis of figures from the Central Bureau of Statistics the general rate of employment in 2019 (before Covid-19) for Israeli citizens aged 25-64 was 78.44%. And for those defining themselves as haredim? 64.46%. Unquestionably lower than the general rate, but not low enough to tag most haredim as tax dodgers.

But with their large families maybe Haredim should be working more and not less than the average Israeli, instead of relying on the excessive government funding haredim allegedly receive?

Exactly how much financial assistance do haredim receive from the government? According to a statement by MK Yair Lapid last year, a 19-year-old haredi yeshiva student receives NIS 8,000 each month from the government. NIS 8,000? Really?

No, at least not according to Dr. Gilad Malach, a researcher for the Israel Democracy Institute, in the Institute’s “Haredi Society in Israel, yearly report (2020) ” (Heb.). The number of government shekels that end up in a yeshiva student’s pocket is, well, zero. The student’s yeshiva, which provides room and board for him, receives an average of NIS 418 per month from the government on his behalf. This is in contrast to university students, for whom the government provides an average budget of NIS 4,907 per student per month, more than ten times the amount yeshiva students receive.

Yeshiva students receive one other financial benefit from the government: they pay the minimum rate of NIS 128 for national insurance, as do all non-yeshiva students over the age of 18.

What about younger haredi students? How much funding do haredi elementary and high schools receive? According to figures for 2020 provided by the Ministry of Education under the Freedom of Information Law, mainstream elementary schools in Israel receive NIS 1,262 per student per month from the ministry. And haredi elementary schools? NIS 404 per student. The government finances NIS 2,625 of a standard high school student’s education per month, in contrast to NIS 655 for haredi high school students. If you’re wondering about the discrepancy in funding, it’s due to a penalty applied to the haredi education system for not fully complying with Israeli regulations for core curriculum studies.

What about older students?

So, the Haredi students aren’t breaking the national budget, but what about their parents? How much government funding is funneled into the bank account of a haredi who learns in kollel, a yeshiva for married students?

Complaints about financial assistance to kollel attendees and other haredi adults usually revolve around the following benefits: kollel stipends, child allowance, property tax reductions, national insurance reductions, day care reductions, and welfare. Of course, the latter five benefits are available to any citizen, but let’s consider them, since haredim with low income and many children tend to qualify more easily and receive greater amounts than typical secular families.

Let’s make a tally. The government provides an average stipend of NIS 752.80 per month to kollel students. An average haredi family with eight children under the age of 18 receives a total of NIS 1,336 in child allowances each month. Property tax rates depend on the municipality and type and size of the dwelling, but let’s include in our tally the maximum reduction available for a typically-sized haredi apartment of 100 square meters. In Jerusalem, for example, such a reduction comes to NIS 564 per month (on the basis of the rate for Zone B, which contains many haredi neighborhoods). Kollel students also pay the minimum national insurance rate of NIS 128. Compare the minimum rate to an employee earning the national average wage of NIS 10,551 who pays about NIS 728 in national insurance and health tax, and we can add a savings of NIS 600 to our tally.

It’s reasonable to assume that kollel families enjoy significant discounts on state-sponsored day care, since reductions are based on income per number of family members, and haredim tend to have many children. But the maximum discount is only available for mothers working close to full time. Fewer working hours mean less of a discount, and paying the costly fees on a part-time salary often doesn’t make sense. Only 57% of employed haredi women actually work full time, and some of those women obviously don’t have day care-aged children. So, although some kollel families do enjoy this benefit, the majority do not. Indeed, there is a proliferation of private day care groups in haredi communities.

A family whose father is in kollel cannot qualify for welfare provided by the National Insurance Institute of Israel (known as Income Support). There is a monthly welfare stipend of NIS 1,040 from the Ministry of Education available for kollel attendees for up to 5 years, but to qualify one must have at least three children, a combined gross family income of less than NIS 1,200 per month, not own a car, and jump through flaming rings of fire. (Alright, not the last condition.) I personally don’t know anyone who qualifies.

So, our final tally per kollel family is approximately NIS 3,250 per month, plus day care reductions for some. Yup, that’s it. Of course, many non-haredi citizens also enjoy some of the benefits included in our calculation. Another point of interest is that most haredim don’t benefit from certain other areas of government funding, such as the national budgets for sports, culture, and entertainment.

Now if our tally only reached NIS 3,250, how is it that so many people swallow false statements about haredim and government funding, such as the NIS 8,000 claim by Lapid?

Part of the misconception may stem from a simple deduction that large families couldn’t possibly sustain themselves on so little. The only logical conclusion is that the government must be supporting them. It’s a reasonable assumption that requires investigation.

So how do haredi families make ends meet?

Several factors contribute to the haredi community’s ability to survive economically. First of all, work. As discussed previously, and contrary to popular opinion, most haredim do work. Another contributing factor is the simple haredi lifestyle. Essentials for many in the secular world such as trips abroad, movies, theater, sport events, clubbing, and electronic devices like smartphones and televisions are considered either taboo or unnecessary luxuries for most haredim. Second-hand clothing is commonly used; less than half of haredim own a car; and the vast majority live in relatively small apartments.

The cohesive and collective nature of haredi communities also impacts economic life. The plethora of free loan societies (known as gemachim) providing everything from wedding dresses to electric screwdrivers to baby cribs, often precludes the need to purchase such items. Interest-free cash loans are also readily available.

And last but not least, financial assistance from outside Israel. Most kollel heads fundraise abroad (before Covid-19), supplementing the base stipend provided by the government with money from private donations. Various charity funds that provide haredi families with food for the holidays, at-cost clothing and shoe sales, half-priced bedding, and various other living expenses, receive most of their donations from the good-hearted religious Jews of the diaspora. Let’s not forget the individual financial assistance that many haredim receive from family and friends, allocated within the context of supporting Torah learning in Israel, considered from a halakhic point of view a preferred allotment of charity tithes. The bottom line here is that haredim are responsible for pumping hundreds of millions of dollars, pounds, and euros into the Israeli economy each year.

It’s difficult to believe that the truth could be so distant from the media’s depiction and the common financial perception of haredim. It’s convenient to build a political campaign on the human tendency to search for a scapegoat, especially following a most troubling year. But maybe we should consider voting for a candidate with positive goals and plans, a leader who wishes to build, progress, and unify, instead of unjustly turning an already fractured nation against a segment of the population. Then these elections will really be worthwhile.

The writer is an independent commentator.

Editor’s note: The “Globes” fact-checking desk “Hamashrokit” (“The Whistle”) recently examined a claim by Yisrael Beitenu leader Avigdor Liberman on Kan Bet radio that state transfers to haredi families amounted to NIS 7 billion annually. Hamashrokit concluded that the true figure was approximately NIS 2.5 billion, of which NIS 1.3 billion was in the form of child allowances, which are paid to parents in all communities in Israel.

Published by Globes, Israel business news – en.globes.co.il – on February 8, 2021

© Copyright of Globes Publisher Itonut (1983) Ltd. 2021

From Globes, here.

Shmad and the Corona Vaccine

לוחצים למורים להתחסן; ואפילו לוחצים למתפללים להתחסן / Israeli Teachers are the Latest Targets. So are ALL Religious Jews.

Friday, February 05, 2021
ערב שבת קודש פר׳ יתרו תשפ״א

English follows the Hebrew.

03.02.21

ישיבת קבינט המומחים המליצה כי רק עובדי הוראה שיתחסנו יוכלו ללמד בכיתות בבתי הספר ומי שטרם התחסן ימשיך ללמד דרך הזום, אך יש להבהיר כי לא ברור בשלב זה האם למהלך יש היתכנות משפטית. נציין כי מנתוני משרד הבריאות עולה כי רק 53% מעובדי ההוראה קיבלו את המנה הראשונה של החיסון (27% את השנייה), על אף שקודמו בוועדת התעדוף של המשרד. עוד המליצו המומחים להתיר תפילות באוויר הפתוח במסגרת של יותר מ-20 איש, בהתנייה שהמשתתפים כבר מחוסנים.

(אדיר ינקו ותמר טרבלי חדד)

עשר אגורות (2¢):

מגילת אסתר
The Scroll Of Esther

ומה קורה למורים [הבוחרים] שאין להם שרות אינטרנט בבית? עד כאן, המורים והתלמידים כאלה מתחברים לפגישות זום דרך מס׳ טלפון. וכן יש דבר כזה. זאת אומרת שהתלמידים החרדים ללא שרות אינטרנט בבית מקבלים שיעורים רק דרך קול המורה, בלי תמונות בלי כתיבת המורה על הלוח ובלי עוד הרבה. כל תלמיד הלומד דרך הטלפון מפסיד.

ומה עם התלמידים בעלי קושי לימוד? התלמידים כאלה כבר מתוסכלים. בעתיד פשוט יהיו יותר מתוסכלים. ומה קורה לתלמידים דתיים מתוסכלים? הם זורקים את הכיפה.
זה מה שכוחות שלטון רוצים? אני בכלל לא משוכנע שלא.

עוד המליצו המומחים להתיר תפילות באוויר הפתוח במסגרת של יותר מ-20 איש, בהתנייה שהמשתתפים כבר מחוסנים.

האם ימנעו מיהודים מלשמוע את קריאת מגילת אסתר בחג הפורים? המצוה הזו קודמת כל המצוות כולן חוץ ממת מצוה. אפילו מצות קריאת המגילה קודמת לתלמוד תורה ובזמן קיום בית המקדש קודמת לעבודת הכהנים בהר הבית.

האם הם יגידו לנו לשמוע את מגילת אסתר דרך זום למרות שלא יוצאים מידי חובה ככה?

אני כבר התרעתי לכם שאם אנו לא ״מתנהגים יפה״ בחג הפורים אז ייתכן שניענש בחג הפסח.

אמיר בוחבוט, 31.01.2021
במכתב שנשלח גם לשר הביטחון ולראש אכ”א, דרשה מועצת החירום למשבר הקורונה לטפל ב”לחצים פסולים” שמופעלים על חיילים. הורים טענו כי בשבועות האחרונים ילדיהם נתקלו באיומים שלא יישלחו לקורסי פיקוד אם לא יתחסנו ואף הוענשו בעיכוב היציאה לביתם. “מנוגד לחוק הבינלאומי”

בע״ה לא ילחצו לחיילי צה״ל להתחסן והחיילים המחליטים הלא להתחסן לא ייענשו.

אבל גם לאזרחים רגילים אמורים להיות אותן הזכויות. נכון?

YNET: Health experts back banning unvaccinated teachers from schools
Teachers Union calls the proposal illegal and says those who choose not to get vaccinated, shouldn’t get punished; so far only 53% of teaching staff have received the first dose of the vaccine and 27% the second

Adir Yanko, Tamar Trabelsi-Hadad | 02.03.21

The panel of health experts advising the coronavirus cabinet formulated a series of recommendations for opening up Israel’s education system, including preventing teachers who have not received both doses of the coronavirus vaccine from teaching in class. (cont.)

Esser Agaroth (2¢):

זום Zoom

What happens to those teachers who choose not have Internet service at home? Until now, these teachers and students connect through the Zoom conferencing service through a local telephone number. (Yes. There is such a thing.) This means that Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) students without internet service at home receive material only by way of the teacher’s voice. This means no pictures nor graphics, save for what is included in their text books, no writing nor drawing diagrams on the board, etc. In other words, every student who learns over the phone loses out.

And what about students with learning difficulties? Such students are already frustrated. They are only destined to become even more frustrated. And what happens to frustrated religious students? They throw off their kippot (skullcap/religious observance).

Is this what powers that be want?

The report continues…

“The experts also recommended allowing open-air prayers for up to 20 people, provided all participants have been vaccinated.

Does this mean that Jews may be prevented from hearing the reading of Megillath Esther (Scroll of Esther) on the holiday of Purim? The reading of Megillath Esther takes precedence over all other mitzvoth (Torah commandments), save for burial of the dead. It even takes precedence over Torah study, and when the Beth HaMiqdash (Temple) stands, it takes precedence over the work of the Kohanim (Temple priests).
Will the government tell us to hear the Megillath Esther on Zoom, even though this does not fulfill this mitzvah?
Sure. Why not? What does the government the powers that be care about mitzvoth?
Arutz 7 reports that so far “…no sanctions will be taken against [IDF] soldiers who refuse to be vaccinated.” Nor should their be. But shouldn’t civilians also be entitled to the same rights?

On Trusting Freedom

A Penchant for Controlling Others

[Editor’s Note: In this 2009 article, Lew Rockwell lists the problems with government mandates on private use of mobile phones. Observant readers will note the “public safety” arguments against the freedom to use phones as we choose are essentially the same as current claims that “public health” is a justification for dictating daily habits and behavior. ]

We all want freedom for ourselves, but many people have doubts about the way others might use their own freedom. Under these conditions, the state is there to help. Get enough people to favor enough restriction, and the state is good to go, administering every aspect life from its smallest to its largest detail.

Every day presents more cases, but the most recent case is stunning. It turns out that 97% of people polled support a universal ban on texting while driving. Half of those surveyed say that the penalty should be as severe as that for drunk driving. Among these, how many do you suppose do text and drive but don’t want to admit it to the pollster? Probably plenty. And yet I couldn’t find a single online defense of the practice anywhere on the web.Best Price: $20.34Buy New $21.14(as of 03:27 EST – Details)

The truth is that it is not necessarily unsafe to text behind the wheel. It all depends on the situation. If you are in a traffic jam, and are late to an appointment, the ability to text can be a lifesaver. Or if there are no cars around, you might be able to risk it. On the other hand, it would probably be a mistake to attempt this doing 80 mph around slower traffic on a freeway.

How can we know the difference between when it is safe and when it is not? The principle applied on American roads is that the driver himself makes that decision. If this principle didn’t make sense, there would be no way that the roads themselves could work at all.

Think of this the next time you are in a big city zooming around curves and between lanes along with thousands of others, doing top speeds. Here we have 4,000-pound hunks of steel barreling down the road without aids other than a dotted yellow line on the road. These are real-life death machines in which one wrong move could cause a 100-car pileup and mass death. We do it anyway.

What’s remarkable is not that there are so many wrecks. The miracle is that it works at all and that, for the most part, people get to where they are going. And consider too the demographic behind the car: old, young, abled, disabled, experienced, inexperienced. Some people have a facility for driving and others do not. Some people have spatial agility and others do not.

How does it all work? Don’t tell me that it is due to central planning and the police. The police aren’t driving every car and controlling every wheel. Our human volition on the road and the decisions we make that affect other drivers are nearly 100% our own.

And yet it works. Why? The reason is that it is not in anyone’s interest to get in a crash. It is in everyone’s interest to get to where one is going in one piece and to do it efficiently. Roll together tens of thousands of people with the same broad goal and you get spontaneous cooperation. Something that people normally think could not work does in fact work. Looked at from that angle, the orderliness we see on the roads is a general expression of the capacity for human society to work in the context of self-interested individualism.

Now think of this poll showing a widespread opposition to texting while driving. I submit that you would get similar results from a poll that asked people about the right to drive:

Do you support or oppose the right of everyone to own 4,000-pound heaps of steel and control them completely and autonomously at top speeds in the midst of thousands of other citizens whose lives could be in danger with so much as a slight flick of the wrist to the right or left?

That question could elicit nearly 100% negative results. We generally trust our capacity to manage ourselves but we do not trust the capacity of others to manage themselves. And we surely don’t believe that society can generally function well under conditions of freedom. Even though we live in the midst of spontaneous order and use its brilliance every day (grocery store, the world wide web, restaurants, housing developments), we don’t really understand it.

Or how about this one:

Do you support the right of anyone over a certain age to buy and consume as much hard liquor as he wants, even to the point of drinking himself into a life-threatening stupor, neglecting the kids, wrecking family life, and killing brain cells that cannot be replaced?

Probably most people would say no. And yet this is precisely the reasoning behind Prohibition, which most people today regard as a terrible error. Today, we supposedly realize that the social cost of the right to drink hard liquor was greater than the supposed benefit we receive from enforcing Prohibition.

So it is with texting and driving. There are times when it is safe. There are times when it is not safe. The only ones who can really know the difference are the people behind the wheel. These people already enjoy the freedom to talk to passengers, to fiddle with their stereo, to drive following an exhausting jog, to drive while distracted with anxieties over work and marriage, to pray or sing in the car, and do many other things that seem like a distraction from the goal at hand. Somehow it all works, and there is a lesson here. You can count on more order to emerge from trusting freedom than you get from attempting to micromanage people’s lives.

Now, the libertarians among us might point out that these roads are publicly owned and that this is the core source of the problem. Under privately owned roads, there might be intense restrictions on what you can and cannot do and these might be part of the contract you make with the road owner.

The market would take care of the rest. If an owner were too restrictive, drivers would take other routes. If they are too lenient, their insurance premiums would rise and they would pay too high a price. The resultant rules of the road would be a result of this careful calibration, tested constantly by the forces of supply and demand.

Under the existing rules of private roads, we see no evidence of a crackdown on texting. Maybe it would come in the future, but at least there would be a market test. When a rule fails in private markets, the rule is changed.

But it is different with government. No matter how preposterous the rule, it stays and stays, regardless of whether it works to accomplish its end. And there can be no question that a crackdown on texting is coming. Obama has already banned texting while driving for federal workers. A bill that would deny federal funds to states is flying through the Senate. Look for a nationwide ban in the coming months.

The ban says, You don’t know what is good for you so you must be forced to do what the government thinks is good for you. The ban gets support because people generally think that while they are responsible and good at calibrating what is safe and unsafe, others are not. Through this method, all freedoms could be abolished.

It’s a bad way to form the rules of a society.

Originally published November 2009.

From LRC, here.