Come to Israel Permanently by CARGO Plane!

Despite Coronavirus, Jews’ Bodies Still Being Flown To Israel For Burial

Despite the coronavirus outbreak and almost the complete shutdown of international travel to Israel, deceased Jews from around the world continue to be flown to Israel for burial.

“The Land of Israel is a very special place for Jewish people to be buried. The flights have been reduced heavily, but there are cargo flights. So it may take a bit longer, but we are getting people coming in,” said Rabbi Michoel Fletcher, who works with Jews abroad seeking to buy burial plots in Israel, The AP reported on Saturday.’

Fletcher said some in New York have decided to temporarily bury their dead in the United States, and then later exhume the bodies when flights to Israel resume.

Jews have sought to be buried in Israel for thousands of years and continue to be flown in by private charter planes, cargo flights and other companies. A burial plot can cost from between a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars, depending on the cemetery.

The Israeli Foreign Ministry said 300 bodies, some of COVID-19 victims, have arrived since February, according to the report. The process is complex and involves handling companies, local Israeli consulates, and the Israeli Health Ministry.

An unidentified Israeli aviation official told the AP that a cargo flight that arrives in Israel from Belgium five times a week brings in about 20 bodies a flight—“an exceptional amount.” Most of the bodies come from France, and there is also a weekly cargo flight from New York, the official said.

(JNS)

From Matzav.com, here.

Is Meta-Halacha a Fact?

May 1, 2020

How do Poskim decide? What do they take into account? And more

***Guest Hosted by Rabbi Avrohom Kahan *** Founder, Bais Din Vaad Hadin V’horaah, Rav, Congregation Khal New City

with Rabbi Moshe Kaufman – Founder and Posek in Chicago Beis Horaah –  10:14
with Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz – Rebbe in Yeshiva Rabeinu Yitzchak Elchanan and Rabbi of Beis HaKnesses of North Woodmere – 34:08
with Rabbi Shmuel Weiner – Rav of Zichron Nosson Tzvi in Ramot Eshkol, Yerushalayim –  53:47

Continue reading…

From Headlines, here.

‘If You Don’t Work, You…’

Losing life and livelihood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of unemployment and all-cause mortality

Authors:
ROELFS David J., et al
Journal article citation:
Social Science and Medicine, 72(6), March 2011, pp.840-854.
Publisher:
Elsevier

Meta-analyses of data from 42 studies from developed nations revealed that unemployment is associated with a significant increase in overall mortality, especially in males and those at the beginning, or middle stage, of their careers. Future studies should continue to investigate mediating, moderate and confounding factors, especially in terms of those that may be modifiable risk factors.

Extended abstract:
AuthorROELFS David J

Losing life and livelihood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of unemployment and all-cause mortality.

Journal citation/publication details

Social Science and Medicine, 72(6), March 2011, pp.840-854.

Summary

Meta-analyses of data from 42 studies from developed nations revealed that unemployment is associated with a significant increase in overall mortality, especially in males and those at the beginning, or middle stage, of their careers. Future studies should continue to investigate mediating, moderate and confounding factors, especially in terms of those that may be modifiable risk factors.

Context

The number of unemployed people worldwide has risen steadily over the last decade, prompting an increase in research on the health effects of unemployment. Most studies have found that unemployment is associated with decreased longevity, but there is no consensus on the degree to which longevity is reduced in population sub-groups, or on the most important mediating, moderating, and confounding factors involved. The aim of this study was to focus on these factors by: evaluating the impact of pre-existing health status and health behaviours on all-cause mortality; comparing the potential moderating effect in countries with and without national health care systems, and; assessing the potential moderating roles of gender, age, time, duration of follow-up, and case-control group composition on the association between unemployment and mortality.

Methods

What sources were searched?
The electronic databases Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched in June 2005 and again in July 2008 and January 2009. Hand searches were carried out on the bibliographies of eligible publications and related articles.

What search terms/strategies were used?
Searches were performed using terms for psychological stress, stress disorders, mortality, unemployment, and a wide range of social factors. Full details of the search algorithm for Medline are presented in an appendix and details of the other search strategies are available from the authors on request. The searches were performed by a research librarian.

What criteria were used to decide on which studies to include?
Studies were included if all-cause mortality was the outcome variable, unemployment was measured at the individual level, and the results were compared between a study population that experienced unemployment and  one that did not experience unemployment at all or experienced it to a lesser extent. Searches were carried out in English but publications found to be published in other languages were included if relevant.

Who decided on their relevance and quality?
Two named authors were responsible for study selection and coding, and a third author was consulted as necessary. Study quality was assessed, using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-randomised trials, by the same two authors working independently; the average rating for each study was used in the analysis. The study selection process is outlined in Figure 1 and includes the number of studies included at each stage.

How many studies were included and where were they from?
A total of 1,570 publications was identified from the database searches; 48 articles met the study inclusion criteria and 30 were included in the review. In all, 232 articles identified from hand search were also included. The pool of 262 publications reported on a range of psychosocial stressors; the current review used a subset of 42 articles that focused on the association between unemployment and all-cause mortality. There were eight studies from the USA, seven each from the UK and Sweden, six from Finland, two each from Denmark, Israel and Japan, and single studies from eight other countries.

How were the study findings combined?
Mortality risk estimates were extracted from the 42 included studies. Odds ratios and relative risks were converted to hazard ratios. Meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were conducted using a random effects model. Further details of statistical methods are included in the study text and appendices.

Findings of the review

In all, 235 mortality risk estimates from 42 studies, and representing more than 20 million people, were analysed. The majority were from men, and almost all were individuals of working-age at baseline.

Unemployed persons were significantly more likely to die than those in a comparator group; the hazard ratio adjusted for age and other covariates was 1.63, showing that unemployment is associated with a 63% higher risk of mortality. The average effect was higher for men than women with an increased risk of 78% compared to 37%, respectively. Unemployed people in their early or mid careers faced an increased risk of 73% and 77%, compared to 25% for those in their late careers. The risk of death was over 70% in the first ten years of follow-up but fell to 42% after that, although the trend was not significant in the final meta-regression model.

Studies that controlled for any measure of health showed no significant difference in the magnitude of risk compared to remaining studies but the hazard ratio was reduced by 24% for studies that controlled for one or more health behaviours, compared to the other studies. This suggests that health behaviour may confound the association between unemployment and mortality and also that pre-existing health behaviour and health conditions do not account for all of the relationship.

No significant difference in mortality was found between unemployed people in the USA, which has no universal health coverage, and the Scandinavian nations combined, where public health care coverage is most comprehensive, or the remaining nations. This suggests that national-level differences in policy may not affect the rate of mortality after unemployment in developed countries.

Authors’ conclusions

‘Unemployment was associated with a substantially increased risk of death among broad segments of the population. Future research should continue to focus on possible mediating, moderating, and confounding factors and on whether this risk is modifiable, either at the health system level or the individual level.’

Implications for policy or practice

None are discussed.

Subject terms:
mortality, risk, unemployment;
Content type:
systematic review
Link:
Journal home page
ISSN print:
0277-9536

Search again for:

Authors:
ROELFS David J.et al
Publisher:
Elsevier
Subject terms:
mortalityriskunemployment

From Social Care Online, here.

Don’t Worry About Bill Gates!

The Messianic World Reformer Behind WHO’s Agenda. (It Isn’t Bill Gates.)

Gary North – April 24, 2020

I have a Ph.D. in history. I am a revisionist (“conspiracy”) historian. I have been ever since 1958.

I have written fat books on historical events and historical causation. I have even written a book on the conspiracy view of history. You can download it here.

As a revisionist historian, I am on the fringe of the fringe of a fringe. In 1958, I became a revisionist historian because of the assistance of a lady who was part of a network of mostly female anti-Communist researchers in southern California. She had a lot of files and conservative books. She introduced me to The Freeman. She also introduced me to the revisionist literature of the Pearl Harbor attack. I learned how to connect the dots at age 16.

I have continued to connect the dots in ways not considered historiographically acceptable.

What I am about to tell you is “the story behind the story,” as Marvin “Robbie the Robot” Miller used to tell us on his daily radio shows in the early 1950’s.

The secret is knowing which questions to ask, and then using the Web to connect the major dots. That will get you started.

Most people ask no questions. They don’t care. Most of the others ask the wrong questions. Then they are lured down rabbit trails by their questions.

THE HISTORIAN’S SIX QUESTIONS

The historical questions are these, and in this sequence: what, where, when, who, why, and how? Each successive question is more difficult to answer.

What? The World Health Organization is part of the United Nations.

Where? Its headquarters are in Geneva, Switzerland. But geography is irrelevant. It is an international organization. It is under the jurisdiction of UNESCO: the United Nations Educational and Social Organization. That is located in the United Nations Building in New York City. Why New York City? Because John D. Rockefeller, Jr. donated the land. It cost him $8.5 million for 18 acres. The city spent another $5 million. The Rockefellers owned the apartment complex across the street. The value of that property soared.

When? It has been around a long time. The Wikipedia entry explains just how long it has been around.

The International Sanitary Conferences, originally held on 23 June 1851, were the first predecessors of the WHO. A series of 14 conferences that lasted from 1851 to 1938, the International Sanitary Conferences worked to combat many diseases, chief among them cholera, yellow fever, and the bubonic plague. The conferences were largely ineffective until the seventh, in 1892; when an International Sanitary Convention that dealt with cholera was passed.Five years later, a convention for the plague was signed. In part as a result of the successes of the Conferences, the Pan-American Sanitary Bureau (1902), and the Office International d’Hygiène Publique (1907) were soon founded. When the League of Nations was formed in 1920, they established the Health Organization of the League of Nations. After World War II, the United Nations absorbed all the other health organizations, to form the WHO.

We also read this in the entry’s introduction:

The WHO was established in 7 April 1948, which is commemorated as World Health Day. The first meeting of the World Health Assembly (WHA), the agency’s governing body, took place on 24 July 1948. The WHO incorporated the assets, personnel, and duties of the League of Nations’ Health Organisation and the Office International d’Hygiène Publique, including the International Classification of Diseases. Its work began in earnest in 1951 following a significant infusion of financial and technical resources.

From the beginning, the organization was committed to the eradication of disease by means of vaccines.

1947: The WHO established an epidemiological information service via telex, and by 1950 a mass tuberculosis inoculation drive using the BCG vaccine was under way.

Who? This is where it gets interesting. We read in the section on “Establishment“:

The first meeting of the World Health Assembly finished on 24 July 1948, having secured a budget of US$5 million (then GB£1,250,000) for the 1949 year. Andrija Stampar was the Assembly’s first president, and G. Brock Chisholm was appointed Director-General of WHO, having served as Executive Secretary during the planning stages.

G. Brock Chisolm was a high-level administrator in the post-World War II New World Order. He was a Canadian. I first wrote about him in 1959 in a high school term paper. He was one of the big promoters of the mental health movement. In 1957, he became the president of the World Federation for Mental Health. This was why I knew who he was when I wrote my term paper. Wikipedia summarizes:

The World Federation for Mental Health (WFMH) is an international, multi-professional non-governmental organization (NGO), including citizen volunteers and former patients. It was founded in 1948 in the same era as the United Nations (UN) and the World Health Organization (WHO). . . .The WFMH founding document, “Mental Health and World Citizenship”, understood “world citizenship” in terms of a “common humanity” respecting individual and cultural differences, and declared that “the ultimate goal of mental health is to help [people] live with their fellows in one world.Members include mental health service providers and service users. In 2009, the World Fellowship for Schizophrenia and Allied Disorders, an international network of families of people with serious mental illness, merged with the World Federation. The World Federation has close ties with the World Health Organization. For many years after its founding, the WFMH was the only NGO of its kind with a close working relationship with UN agencies, particularly the WHO.

In my 1959 paper (which I saved), I quoted Dr. Chisholm. He wrote “The Psychiatry of an Enduring Peace” in Psychiatry (Feb. 1946).

The responsibility of charting the necessary changes in human behavior rests clearly on the sciences working in that field. Psychologists, psychiatrists, sociologists, economists, and politicians must face this responsibility. It cannot be avoided (p. 5).We have been very slow to rediscover this truth and to recognize the unnecessary and artificially imposed inferiority, guilt, and fear, commonly known as sin, under which we have almost all labor and which produces so much of the social maladjustment and unhappiness in the world (p. 7).

There is something to be said for taking charge of our own destiny, for gently putting aside the mistaken old ways of our elders if that is possible. If it cannot be done quietly, it may have to be done roughly or even violently — that has happened before (p. 18)

Five months after the article was published, he was appointed as the head of the predecessor of the WHO, the WHO Interim Commission. Officially, it was part of UNESCO, which at the time was run by the scientific world’s most famous defender of eugenics, Sir Julian Huxley.

The Canadian Encyclopedia offers this insight:

In the negotiations leading up to the WHO’s formation, Chisholm stressed that the organization must be truly global in its scope. He insisted that it serve the “world citizen” and see past divisions imposed by national borders and histories.

In 2009, the University of British Columbia Press published a book on Chisholm: Brock Chisholm, the World Health Organization, and the Cold War. In a review of this book published on the website of the academic Humanities and Social Science Online, we read this:

As deputy minister [of Canada’s newly created Department of Public Health and Welfare], Chisholm was not a retiring bureaucrat; rather, he repeatedly drew unwanted attention to his department for ill-considered and sometimes outrageous public comments. He treated his office as a pulpit from which to preach Freudian-inspired ideas about proper parenting and the perversions of religion and popular morality. Much of what he had to say concerned what he saw to be the root causes of war. War, he argued, was a manifestation of collective neurosis: the consequence of poor parenting and social institutions that delivered humanity into a state of perpetual immaturity. He condemned the central institutions of society — family, school, and church — for propagating the dogmas that lay at the base of this collective neurosis. Perhaps most famously, Chisholm lashed out against Santa Claus. In an address to an Ottawa audience, he declared that parents crippled their children by consistently lying to them: “Any man who tells his son that the sun goes to bed at night is contributing directly to the next war…. Any child who believes in Santa Claus has had his ability to think permanently destroyed” (p. 43).

The WHO has a page reviewing the book. We read this:

A postscript could perhaps have mentioned that those early visionary ideas have turned out to be not that illusory after all. Chisholm’s hope of universal health services now guides WHO’s Global Strategy for Health for All; his advocacy of a peacekeeping force is now reality, albeit weak, through the UN Blue Berets; his ideas on world federalism are partly translated in the European Union; his anti-nuclear stand has seen the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs receive the Nobel Peace Prize; and his poverty–disease link is key to UN Millennium Development Goals.

It is a highly laudatory review, as we would expect.

In 1959, he was named the man of the year by the American Humanist Association.

What is also significant is the fact that he had no background in epidemiology. He was a psychiatrist. He had been a political appointment in Canada, and he was a political appointment with the WHO. He was the director-general of the WHO in 1946, before it was established as a separate organization. The WHO website says this:

The Canadian Government created the position of Deputy Minister of Health in 1944, and Chisholm was first the person to occupy the post until being elected as Executive Secretary of the WHO Interim Commission in July 1946.

Succeeding the League of Nations’ Health Organization, the World Health Organization was established in April of 1948, with Chisholm as its Director-General.

It was Chisholm who proposed the name “World Health Organization”, with the intent of emphasizing that the Organization would be truly global, serving all nations. Chisholm’s vision of WHO was a determining factor in the election for the post of Director-General. Parts of WHO’s constitution, including the definition of health as “…a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”, were first heard in Chisholm’s speech to the final meeting of WHO’s technical planning committee.

The WHO constitution also declares health to be a fundamental right of every human being, and recognizes that “the heath of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and security.” Chisholm believed that the well-being of humanity is dependent on the world’s emotional health.

The significant question is this: how did he get the two appointments? That is the question that revisionist historians ask whenever government economic intervention is involved. It is the question that Murray Rothbard asked again and again in his histories of American intervention. It is the question that is almost never raised by conventional historians.

Continue reading…

From Gary North, here.

Plague Is Decided by Percentages, Not Absolute Numbers!

Notes from the Underground — Monday morning edition

Sunday, April 26, 2020
1) Apologies for starting off your day with an opinion note instead of Torah — skip to part 2 if you like — but I want to get this off my mind.
“We must not look for pro forma loopholes or so-called solutions which –at best– may mitigate, but certainly will not eliminate, the dangers of this disease. The Torah absolutely condemns and forbids acting in a way which – under any circumstances – may allow for the death of a Jew.”  (source for the quote, emphasis added by me)

If this is the standard our Rabbis are now adopting, then forget leaving your house ever again.   You drive a car — you may get into an accident.  You walk the streets — you may get attacked, run over, etc.  It is simply impossible to eliminate danger from life, whether it be from this disease or any other illness, threat, or source of danger.

Especially in the current situation, there is simply no way to prevent the death of a Jew “under any circumstances.”   See here — one of what I fear will be many suicides to come. See here — “Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who researches health policy at Stanford University, said…The coronavirus can kill…but a global depression will, as well.” See here — “The looming global recession… could cause hundreds of thousands of child deaths…”  I could go on and on with many similar citations and examples. This is a trolley problem — there will be deaths no matter what course of action is taken.  The ONLY strategy that makes any sense is to try to MITIGATE the worst of the consequences. By not realizing that that is the goal — not the elimination of death due to the disease — we risk wasting time, money, and resources and doing more harm than good. Again, just my opinion. With all due respect, I am really at a loss to understand the thinking here.