Avraham Shusteris: Annex South Lebanon!

4 reasons Israel should annex southern Lebanon

Israel has no choice but to annex this area if it wants to allow its residents to return to the north. Op-ed.

Avraham Shusteris  Apr 21, 2024, 11:44 PM (GMT+3)
Israel did not choose to go to war with Hezbollah. When Hezbollah decided to join Hamas after October 7th in unprovoked attacks against Israel, it created many challenges, but also some unique opportunities for Israel, namely the ability and justification to annex southern Lebanon.

While at first glance this may seem like an outlandish idea, annexation would provide Israel with several worthwhile benefits that deserve consideration.

Regaining Deterrence- Reducing risk of Multi Theatre War

In a normal state of affairs, when one country threatens the sovereignty of another by attacking it- that country itself risks losing its own territory. Unfortunately, Israel’s enemies currently feel that they can fire missiles at Israel with little to no risk to their own sovereignty. This very dangerous and faulty equation is the reason why Israel is currently faced with the possibility of a multifront war.

Countries who attack Israel feel like they don’t have much to lose. If Yemen, Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, or Jordan understood that by attacking Israel they will lose their land, they would be less inclined to do so. By setting a precedent with southern Lebanon, other countries will be deterred from taking risks.

Providing security to residents of Israel’s North

With around 100.000 Israeli residents currently displaced from cities and towns on Israels northern borders, Israel needs to quickly find a way to restore both security and a sense of security that would allow its residents to return to their homes and rebuild their communities. By annexing and populating Southern Lebanon with Israeli citizens and creating a permanent military presence, Israel would be effectively creating a massive buffer zone that would neutralize the threat of Hezbollah tunnels, infiltrations and short-range missiles from Lebanon which in turn would allow residents of Metula and Kiryat Shmona to return home safely.

After Oct 7th, people no longer feel comfortable relying on the good intentions of our neighbors. In order for people to return and rebuild their communities, they need to feel a strong sense of security that only annexation and military presence can provide. The experiment in Gaza has proven once and for all that in the land of Israel, where there is Jewish settlement, there is security. Where there is a lack of settlement, there are hotbeds of terror.

But the question remains, who will go to settle Southern Lebanon?

Solving two of Israel’s major pressing societal problems- hareidi Draft and the Housing Crisis

By annexing southern Lebanon and providing heavily discounted housing to the hareidi public that is willing to settle it, this could become a way out of Israel’s looming hareidi draft problem. Instead of forcing hareidi conscription, the Israeli hareidim could provide a massive security contribution to the State of Israel by populating southern Lebanon. Heavily discounted or free housing would certainly go a long way to incentivize the move and provide a solution to the housing crisis.

If you are skeptical about the hareidi willingness to be pioneers, keep in mind that the two largest settlements in Judea and Samaria are hareidi- Modiin Illit and Beitar. If the price is right, the hareidim will make southern Lebanon into the next Bet Shemesh.

But how can Israel annex another country?

Israel wouldn’t be annexing another country. Southern Lebanon, according to all accounts, is considered part of the Biblical land of Israel. This land was promised to the Jewish people in the Bible- no other country has such a strong deed to their land.

Furthermore, Israel has no choice but to annex this area if it wants to allow its residents to return to the north. Anything short of annexation would mean that Israel is effectively ceding territory by abandoning northern communities since its residents would be afraid to return otherwise. If America opposes annexation, it is welcome to return Texas and California to Mexico. Until it does so, it is in no position to preach.

As daunting as this may seem, Israel may be able to pull this off more easily than expected thanks to the fact that the vast majority of Southern Lebanon is Shiite, so Israel may be able to annex without a significant fight from the Sunni and Christian populations that dominate other parts of the country.

Israel did not choose to be in this situation, but with a little bit of faith and courage, it now has the opportunity to kill quite a few birds with one stone. I hope it doesn’t squander it.

From Arutz Sheva, here.

ספר חדש: מה יעשו היום בבית המקדש? – הרב אברהם בורשטין

ספר חדש: מה יעשו היום בבית המקדש?

למעלה מעשור עוסק הרב אברהם בורשטין בניסיון להבין כיצד תראה בפועל עבודת בית המקדש, כעת יוצא ספר בנושא.

Not Everything In Hebrew Seforim Deserves To Be Read – R’ Avigdor Miller

RAV AVIGDOR MILLER ON THE TEN DROPS OF WINE AT THE SEDER

Q:

The Rabbi mentioned in his lecture tonight that we are expected to rejoice at the downfall of the wicked and that’s why we celebrate the punishment of the Mitzrim. If that’s really true, then why do we take drops of wine out of the cup of wine at the Seder?

A:

This gentleman is asking, why is the cup of wine diminished by drops at the Seder? Which means that this person has heard that the significance of the drops that we remove from our cup at the Seder is that the suffering of the wicked is a diminishing of our own happiness.

 

Now, I want to tell you people something that will come in handy. There are many explanations that have been invented to suit the modern taste. But at this table (the Rav zatzal banged on the table) the principle is that we’re suiting nobody’s taste except the truth.

 

Now, I understand that if I had to speak someplace else I couldn’t speak on this subject. And that’s because the spirit of the gentile world is not to exalt in vengeance. Oh no! They only exalt in killing Jews, and in gas chambers and crematoria. They wouldn’t think of such a wicked thing as vengeance. The Pope and the bishops of the Anglican Church are very much interested only in the nobler aspects of life. And so when the Jews were being shipped off to the death camps and being burned at the rate of twenty-thousand a day, so the Pope was busy talking about peace and the love of all man. And the archbishop of the church of England was busy talking about brotherhood and friendship. All the time, words of love were gushing forth from these two fountains of saintliness. But never did one of them speak up that it’s time to stop murdering Jews. Maybe instead of twenty-thousand Jews a day, maybe they should kill only ten thousand Jews a day?! No, this they didn’t even try. Twenty-thousand, that’s fine. It’s good enough. It’s not thirty-thousand, they said. What do you want already?

 

And so, nobody intervened for the Jews. But at the same time they would deign to say such wicked words like I’m saying here tonight; about rejoicing in the downfall of would-be murderers and such terrible oppressors as the Egyptians were. To rejoice in their downfall is a righteous thing?! Oh no; that, they would never say!

 

So the modern rabbis who are paid by the Sisterhood are busy reinterpreting the Torah in a way that is acceptable to them. And therefore, after a while it becomes widespread in the Jewish street that this is a Torah attitude – that you take out drops of wine in order to signify that our happiness is diminished because of the suffering of the wicked.

 

And I want to tell you, even if you saw it in a chassidishe sefer, don’t be excited. I can tell you that not everything that is printed, even in lashon kodeshdika seforim, deserves to be read. And even some seforim that are three-hundred and four-hundred years old.

 

You have to use discretion in what you read. Drush has been in force for at least three-hundred years, so don’t be excited even if you saw this in a sefer. It’s absolutely not true! That’s not the significance of this minhag.

 

And if you want – now, I’m just telling you a guess of mine, but if you want a more true significance, I’ll tell you that we’re shedding the blood of the Egyptians when we drip the drops from the cup; we’re taking part because we’re happy על דם רשעים שנשפך, about the blood of the wicked that has been spilled. That’s a different explanation, a better explanation.

 

Now, of course, if I was out in Westchester or in Scarsdale, and I was giving a pre-Pesach class to the Ladies’ Auxiliary, I would speak about something else. So, it may be that you saw this in some good sefer, but I’m not impressed anyhow. You have to know that not everything printed is worth repeating.

TAPE # 26 (April 1974)

Editor’s Note: Although this reason of “our diminishing joy due to the suffering of the Mitzrim” is widely quoted in many hagadahs today (and sometimes even wrongly attributed to the Abarbanel) it is actually a quite recent explanation that was first invented in the late 1800’s and then recorded in print for the first time by Eduard Baneth in 1904. This reason was then popularized among the masses when it was quoted in haggadahs that were printed in America in the 1940’s and 50’s. For example in a popular haggadah published in 1943 by the National Jewish Welfare Board “for members of the armed forces of the United States to address the compatibility of Jewish and American values” this is the reason given for the minhag.

The earliest reference to the minhag itself is actually found in the Pesach Drashos of the Rokeach (c. 1176-1238) and his mystical explanation of the sixteen drops of wine seems to be more in line with Rav Miller’s words above, in that it hints to the “sixteen sides sword of Hakodosh Boruch Hu.” The Sefer Maharil quotes the Rokeach and explains that we want the vengeance of Hashem “to fall upon our enemies.” The Darkei Moshe quotes the Maharil and writes that the minhag hints to the “angel in charge of vengeance.”

From Toras Avigdor, here.