אתה לא חייב אינטרנט בטלפון

נאמבר • הטלפון שלכם מכיל הרבה יותר

אתר קול חי 

לאחרונה התפרסם בכלי התקשורת כי הונחה הצעה על שולחן הממשלה לאחד את מוקדי החירום תחת מספר טלפון אחד. בדיון בכנסת סיפרה צעירה שנזקקה לשירותי החירום כי איבדה זמן יקר מכיוון שהתקשרה למוקד הלא נכון. מספרי הטלפון של מוקדי החירום אמורים להיות ברורים לכל אזרח ישראלי, אך מסתבר שחלק ניכר מהאוכלוסיה אינו מודע להם.

אם במספרי חירום זהו המצב, ניתן להניח כי במספרי טלפון רגילים, שאינם בעלי חיוג מקוצר של שלוש ספרות, אתם מאבדים את הראש, ומנסים לחפש את מספר הטלפון של סניף הבנק, קופת החולים או אפילו תחנת המוניות הקרובה בכל מקום אפשרי.

למקום הזה בדיוק נכנס פרוייקט חדש בשם ‘נאמבר’.

נאמבר היא מערכת ממוחשבת מתקדמת שמזהה את בקשתכם ומעביר אתכם לחברה או לשרות אשר אתם מעוניינים בו. פשוט מתקשרים למערכת, אומרים את היעד שעימו ברצונכם ליצור קשר, דוגמה “ביטוח לאומי” “רכבת ישראל” ונאמבר עושה את שאר העבודה בשבילכם. מספר ראשי של הבנק שלכם,או קופת החולים, .או כל מוסד מוכר אחר, רק תבקשו, ותקושרו.

לא רק מוסדות ממשלתיים ופיננסיים, נאמבר גם מסייע לכם למצוא שירותים בסביבתכם כשאינכם מכירים את הסביבה. יצאתם לבלות ואתם רוצים להזמין פיצה בבני ברק , בקשו מנאמבר פיצה בבני ברק ונאמבר כבר תמצא את הפיצריה בבני ברק ותקשר אתכם אליה.

וכן אם ברצונכם למצוא נייד של משהו פשוט חייגו ואמרו “שרות מודיעין” ואת שם החברה הסלולארית שלדעתכם הוא שייך אליה ותחוברו למוקד של חברות הסלולר שם תוכלו לקבל חינם את המספר .

נאמבר הוא כמו המזכירה האישית שלי אומר אברהם, מנהל מוסד חינוכי במרכז, אני מבקש שיקשר אותי והוא עושה בדיוק את מה שאני מצפה ממנו.

המערכת המתוחכמת של נאמר היא מערכת לומדת, ומהר. אם ביקשתם יעד שאינו קיים במערכת, המערכת תבדוק את בקשתכם ובהתאם לצורך היא תוסיף , כך שבפעם הבאה שתחפשו, נאמבר כבר יהיה מוכן בשבילכם. בנוסף, נאמבר מכיר מילות קישור ליעד שאתם מבקשים, כך לדוגמא מבצע בצירוף שם חברה יפנה אתכם למוקד המבצע של החברה, ומילים מתוך סלוגן או פרסומת ששמעתם ברדיו, יובילו אתכם ישירות אל המפרסם אותו אתם מבקשים.

אז מהיום, לטלפון שלכם יש רק מספר אחד – נאמבר – 072-3-700-700

השרות בחינם לבעלי חבילות ללא הגבלה או בעלות שיחה רגילה

מאתר קול חי, כאן.

How Is State Socialism Not DEAD Yet?!

Why does support for socialism persist?

The short answer may be simple human nature, our natural tendency toward dissatisfaction with the present and unease about the future. Even in the midst of almost unimaginable material comforts made possible only by markets and entrepreneurs—both derided by socialists—we cannot manage to conclusively defeat the tired but deadly old arguments for collective ownership of capital. We’re so rich that socialists imagine the material wealth all around us will continue to organize itself magically, regardless of incentives.

It’s a vexing problem, and not an academic one. Millions of young people across America and the West consider socialism a viable and even noble approach to organizing society, literally unaware of the piles of bodies various socialist governments produced in the 20th century. The fast-growing Democratic Socialists of America, led by media darlings Rashida Tlaib and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, now enjoy cool kid status. Open socialist Bernie Sanders very nearly won the Democratic Party’s 2016 nominee for president before being kneecapped by the Clinton machine. New York City mayor Bill de Blasio helpfully announces “there is plenty of money in this city, it’s just in the wrong hands.” He freely and enthusiastically champions confiscation and redistribution of wealth without injury to his political popularity.

Rand Paul and Thomas Massie are outliers on the Right. Ocasio-Cortez and de Blasio are not outliers on the Left.

How is this possible, even as markets and semi-capitalism lift millions out of poverty? Why does socialism keep cropping up, and why do many well-intentioned (and ill-intentioned) people keep falling for something so patently evil and unworkable? Why do some battles have to be fought over and over?

The Soviet Union collapsed and the Berlin War fell decades ago. The Eastern Bloc discovered western consumerism and liked it. Bill Clinton declared the era of Big Government over, and Francis Fukuyama absurdly pronounced that Western ideology had forever won the day. Even China and Cuba eventually succumbed to pressure for greater economic freedoms, not because of any ideological shift but because it became impossible to hide the reality of capitalist wealth abroad.

Yet economic freedom and property rights are under assault today in the very Western nations that became rich because of them.

Today’s socialists insist their model society would look like Sweden or Denmark; not the USSR or Nazi Germany or Venezuela. They merely want fairness and equality, free healthcare and schooling, an end to “hoarded” wealth, and so forth. And they don’t always advocate for or even know the textbook definition of socialism, as professors Benjamin Powell and Robert Lawson learned by attending socialist conferences (see their new book Socialism: Two Economists Drink Their Way Through the Unfree World). In many cases, young people think socialism simply means a happy world where people are taken care of.

Never mind the Scandinavian countries in question insist they are not socialist, never mind the atrocities of Stalin or Mao or Pol Pot, and never mind the overwhelming case made by Ludwig von Mises and others against central economic planning. Without private owners, without capital at risk, without prices, and especially without profit and loss signals, economies quickly become corrupted and serve only the political class. Nicolás Maduro feasts while poor Venezuelans eat dogs, but of course this isn’t “real” socialism.

History and theory don’t matter to socialists because they imagine society can be engineered. The old arguments and historical examples simply don’t apply: even human nature is malleable, and whenever our stubborn tendencies don’t comport with socialism’s grand plans a “social construct” is to blame.

These most recent spasms of support for the deadly ideology of socialism remind us that progressives aren’t kidding. They may not fully understand what socialism means, but they fully intend to bring it about. Single-payer health care, “free” education, wealth redistribution schemes, highly progressive income taxes, wealth taxes, gun bans, and radical curbs on fossil fuels are all on the immediate agenda. They will do this quickly if possible, incrementally if they have to (see, again, the 20th century). They will do it with or without popular support, using legislatures, courts and judges, supranational agencies, university indoctrination, friendly media, or whatever political, economic, or social tools it takes (including de-platforming and hate speech laws). This is not paranoia; all of this is openly discussed. And say what you will about progressivism, it does have a central if false ethos: egalitarianism.

Conservatives, by contrast, are not serious. They have no animating spirit. They don’t much talk about liberty or property or markets or opportunity. They don’t mean what they say about the Constitution, they won’t do a thing to limit government, they won’t touch entitlements or defense spending, they won’t abolish the Department of Education or a single federal agency, they won’t touch abortion laws, and they sure won’t give up their own socialist impulses. Trumpism, though not conservative and thoroughly non-intellectual, drove a final stake through the barely beating heart of Right intellectualism, from the Weekly Standard to National Review. Conservatism today is incoherent, both ideologically and tactically incapable of countering the rising tide of socialism.

Generals always fight the last war, and politics is no different. We all tend to see the current political climate in terms of old and familiar divisions, long-faded alliances, and obsolete rhetoric. We all cling to the comfortable ideology and influences that help us make sense of a chaotic world. As one commenter recently put it, liberal Baby Boomers still think it’s 1968 and conservative Baby Boomers still think it’s 1985. Generation X and Millennials will exhibit the same blinders. It may be disheartening to keep fighting what should be a long-settled battle against socialism, but today we have no other choice.

From Lewrockwell.com, here.

There Are 3 Kinds of Lies: There Are White Lies. There Are Outrageous Lies. And Then There Is Mussar…

Purity is not Focus

I started reading the book based on Rabbi Noach Weinberg’s famous 48 Ways classes and stopped when I got annoyed with the “purity” chapter.
Rabbi Weinberg developed a curriculum on the mishna in Pirkei Avos which lists the 48 ways needed to acquire Torah. But, as I agree with Rabbi Dovid Orlofsky, the mishna refers exclusively to acquiring Torah, while R’ Weinberg uses it as a way to wisdom and success in life in general. So his class on tahara is used to discuss focus, which is definitely not what tahara is about! He lost me there…

When Is the Right Time to Recite Birkat Halevanah? Rabbi Avi Grossman Explains

On the Times Commonly Presented for Birkat HaL’vana: Part 1

Avi Grossman
 
Abstract
 
Typical Jewish calendars list two particular z’manim for “the first time that one may begin to recite kiddush l’vana (or birkat hal’vana).” The first is referred to as minhag yerushalayim or minhag haperushim, or simply “the three-day minhag,” and the second time, to wait for seven days to pass from the start of the lunar month to recite the blessing, is attributed to the Shulhan Aruch. These two times are calculated as exactly either 72 hours or 168 hours after the average molad of each Hebrew month. These positions do not truly reflect those of our sages, nor of the Rishonim, and nor of the Shulhan Aruch. The usual shul calendars, like the Ittim L’vina calendar and the Tukachinsky calendar, mislead the public with regards to when the earliest time for saying the blessing really is. The issue is based on a number of fallacious calculations, including misapplying a chumra of the Pri M’gadim regarding an opinion of the Rema to an opinion of the Shulhan Aruch, and assuming that the Shulhan Aruch completely dismissed the halacha as described by the Talmud in favor of a later, kabbalistic opinion. The purpose of this article is to argue for a reevaluation as to how the typical calendars present these issues to the laymen and to call for a more accurate presentation of the z’manim as understood by Rishonim like Maimonides.
Introduction
If you take a look at the usual Jewish calendars, you will find that every month two particular z’manim are presented for “the first time that one may begin to recite kiddush l’vana (or birkat hal’vana).” The first is based on the writings of the Vilna Gaon, and referred to as minhag yerushalayim or minhag haperushim, or simply “the three-day minhag,” and the second is attributed to Rabbi Yosef Karo, the author of the Beth Yosef and the Shulhan Aruch, who was usually referred to by the name of his former work. TheShulhan Aruch makes mention of waiting for seven days to pass (ostensibly from the start of the lunar month) to recite the blessing. These two times are calculated as follows: exactly 72 hours (3 times 24 hours) or 168 hours (7 times 24 hours) after the average molad of each Hebrew month, the molad that is announced in the synagogue before each Rosh Hodesh and used to calculate when each Tishrei is to start, thereby making it the basis for our set calendar.
It is my goal to show that these positions do not truly reflect those of our sages, nor of the Rishonim, and that Beth Yosef himself actually held like the majority of Rishonim, while his seven-day minhag is also misrepresented in the printed calendars. The usual shul calendars, like the Ittim L’vina calendar and the Tukachinsky calendar, mislead the public with regards to when the earliest time for saying the blessing really is. I have tried to speak to the publishers about this issue, but to no avail.
Talmud And Rishonim: Birkat Hal’vana Ideally On Rosh Hodesh
Rabbi David Bar Hayim maintains that the monthly recitation of birkat hal’vana should, in accordance with the plain meaning of the Talmud and the opinion of the rishonim, ideally be on Rosh Hodesh, and in the event that that cannot be done, as soon as possible thereafter. See here. His first proofs are the most elegant.
“Whoever recites the b’rakha over the new moon at the proper time (bizmano) welcomes, as it were, the presence of the Sh’khina” (Sanhedrin 42a). What does bizmano mean if not that one should strive to recite this b’rakha at the earliest opportunity? In a number of manuscripts, we find a variant reading – “Whoever recites the b’rakha for Rosh Hodhesh…” – which leaves no room for doubt as to R. Yohanan’s intention.
 
It should also be noted that throughout the rest of the Talmud, “z’mano” of the new moon is the night it is supposed to be sighted, i.e., the first night of the month. He also points out that
The Talmud Y’rushalmi (B’rakhoth 9:2) speaks plainly of reciting the b’rakha at the time of the moon’s reappearance (HaRo’e eth HaL’vana b’hidhusha). This is also the very deliberate wording of both Halakhoth G’dholoth and Riph (Chap 9 43b). This expression can only be understood as explained above.
This is also the language utilized by Maimonides and the Shulhan Aruch, and will become crucial when we seek to understand the opinion of the Beth Yosef. Rabbi Nahum Rabinovitch, the math professor turned Rosh Yeshiva, also told me that such is the halacha, and it is proper to make others aware of this. There is a group called the Israeli New Moon Society that keeps track of the sightings of the new moon and publishes online guides for amateurs who wish to spot the new moon. The society enjoys Rabbi Rabinovitch’s support, and he used the society’s founder’s diagrams in his own commentary on Maimonides’s Hilchot Kiddush HaHodesh.
This position should come as a surprise to many. In America, the prevailing practice is to wait specifically for after the Sabbath, while here in Israel most are used to hearing about the three-day or seven-day customs.
We should begin our discussion with the relevant Talmudic sources, YT Berachot 9:2 and BT Sanhedrin 42-43, which state that one has until the sixteenth of the month to recite birkat hal’vana. The running assumption of the rishonim and logic is that the assumed first time to recite the blessing is right at the beginning of the month, similar to the obvious point that if one were told to perform a commandment in the morning and that he had until 9am, then it would be understood that he can start doing it when the morning starts. After all, is he supposed to do it before the morning, while it is still the preceding night? This position is explicit in Rashi’s comments to the gemara, the Meiri’s explanation thereof, and in Maimonides’s codification of the law (Berachot, 10:16-17), but is also the only way to understand the halacha unless other considerations are introduced. A simple reading of the both Talmudim indicate without a doubt that the blessing is to be recited on Rosh Hodesh. Rabbi Kappah, in his commentary to the Mishneh Torah (ibid.), writes that this is and always was the Yemenite practice. Note also that this halacha makes no mention of the molad or of any calculation concerning the first time for reciting this blessing, because as one of the birkot har’iya, it only depends on seeing something.
I believe that Hazal instituted this blessing specifically for the first sighting of the moon because, once upon a time, the Jewish people joyously anticipated the first sighting of the moon. The Mishna in Rosh Hashana (chapter 2) describes how the Sanhedrin actually wanted to encourage competition among potential witnesses! Jewish life once revolved around the calendar, which itself was not predetermined. Thus, every month, Jews throughout ancient Israel and the Diaspora were involved in keeping track of the sighting of the new moon, as it affected when the holidays would be. Imagine not knowing during the first of week of Elul if the first of Tishrei was going to be on Thursday or perhaps on Friday some weeks later. It can have a major effect on everyone’s holiday plans.
However, most of the calendars do not take into account when the actual first sighting of the moon will be every month. Instead, they follow a different interpretation of a view cited in the Beth Yosef, thus presenting a first time for birkat hal’vana that is sometimes as many as three days after the actual first opportunity.

Continue reading…

From The Seforim Blog, here.