משיח הוא רק השלב השישי בגאולה

תפילת הרמב”ם בבית הגדול והקדוש, ודברי המנחת יצחק

מכתב הרמב”ם על תפילה בהר הבית ● הר הבית נקרא גם בית המקדש ● דעת המנחת יצחק ● חשש מים חלוקים או עכורים ● חשש טבול יום ● חשש זבים ● חשש מצורע ● גבולות העזרה ● ראיה מן הגאונים ● שורש דברי המנחת יצחק ● משיח הוא תקופה מאוחרת בתהליכי הגאולה ● העיוות שנעשה בנושא אמונת המשיח ● רדיפות נגד הרוצים לקיים את התורה ● ארץ ישראל ● תכלת ● הר הבית ● חששות לא נכונים ● דברים גדולים נעשים ע”י אנשים קטנים ● מכתב הנצי”ב

המשך לקרוא

מאתר בריתי יצחק – הרב ברנד, כאן.

Government Educational Funding Is a Bribe in Capital Law

Shas Gonna Shas

Statements from various rabbis about the complicity of Haredi parties in the dangerous policies of left-wing governments in Israel.

“Haters gonna hate,” the saying goes. Ditto for political parties.

On January 3, Ynet reported about a Shas event held in the Arab Galilee village of Abu Sanan. Aryeh Deri mentioned feeling at home and told his audience, “You will have someone to turn to and our respect.” Eli Yishai likewise stated, “Inshallah, God willing, we will have our victory party right here.”

This should be as surprising as reading that Meretz members advocate public transportation on Shabbat. Does Shas greasing the rails for Oslo I by abstention ring a bell? How about the coalition Shas formed with Meretz and Labor in 1992 to enable Rabin’s government?

It wasn’t out of the blue that Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff said in 2010, “Any commitment of Shas to Torat HaShem Temima is purely coincidental at best… A vote for Shas is a vote to give back the Kotel” (See 28:45 here.)

Rabbi David Bar-Hayim has commented on Shas and Oslo I: “They allowed it to take place because they did nothing…They did nothing because they were paid off. This is a clear-cut, simple, straightforward case of shochad…” (See 1:19:50 here.)

But the problem isn’t just Shas. Before the establishment of this party, the Lubavitcher Rebbe zt”l likewise stated regarding the Camp David Accords:

What’s most distressing is that the voices that should have been raised in opposition have been   silenced by bribes. Those who have accepted the bribes may protest the money has gone to Yeshivos, etc. However, no money that is stained with Jewish blood can help in the education of a Jewish child.

These words remain all too timely, as do those of Rabbi Meir Kahane hy”d in 1981:

Years of a National Religious Party holding the balance of power in the government and doing    nothing as it supped happily at the tables of money and power. Almost four years of an Agudat Yisrael party, which is quite happy to support Begin in return for money for its institutions and yeshivot.

Specific to Rabbi Kahane’s points, Rabbi Rakeffets remarked on various occasions from 2005 and 2012 about the destruction of Gush Katif, the empowerment of Hamas, and the complicity of Agudat Yisrael:

* “You open up The Jewish Press, Menachem Porush is crying and yelling and shouting…against the disengagement. You phony. You falsifier. You liar. Your own party is sitting in the government and giving them a majority and enabling them to do what they want, and you’re crying in The Jewish Press. And people are so stupid. They read it and follow it and think Torah Mi Sinai. (See 28:55 here.)

* “Every rocket falling in on Israel today—Agudat Yisrael, the Gerrer Rebbe, has a share in it.” (See 8:50 here.)

* “…a Moetzet Gedolei HaTorah that enabled the Israeli government to give back Gush Katif and bring endless tragedy upon the Jewish People…Agudat Yisrael made it possible. I lived it. I saw it. It was tangible. Everyone knows about it…The price we are paying, the price we have paid, and the price we will yet pay for the stupidity of Agudat Yisrael that enabled the Israeli government to go along with Sharon and Olmert. It’s overwhelming.” (See 1:05:35 here.)

Menachem Ben-MordechaiAbout the Author: Menachem Ben-Mordechai has written for numerous publications on subjects ranging from Israel and Latin America to the sport of powerlifting and life insurance. He has also coached elite powerlifters as well as beginners. Menachem’s other writing can be found under the name Myles Kantor.

The author’s opinion does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Jewish Press.

Secessionary Slavery Abolitionists

Union and Bondage

04/12/2001 Myles Kantor

A review of A New Birth of Freedom: Abraham Lincoln and the Coming of the Civil War (Roman and Littlefield, 2000, 750 pp.)

At a recent appearance before the Heritage Foundation to discuss A New Birth of Freedom, James Bovard asked author Harry Jaffa how Abraham Lincoln’s suppression of Southern secession reflected on his commitment to consensual government.  Jaffa responded by citing the supremacy of a presidential election and the anarchic ramifications of political withdrawal.

Secession is by and large equated with a supposedly racist insurrection—the Confederacy—so Jaffa’s assertions seem unobjectionable juxtaposed with this demonized polity.  If we juxtapose them with another set of circumstances, however, they betray abhorrent entailments.

On December 20, 1860, a Massachusetts convention passed the following ordinance:

Whereas, Abraham Lincoln has been elected President of the United States, and

Whereas, President-elect Lincoln has affirmed support of the Fugitive Slave Act, and

Whereas, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and all non-slaveholding states shall be bound to aid in the rendition of fugitive slaves under this administration, and

Whereas, Such complicity with the iniquitous institution of slavery is repugnant to the consciences of this commonwealth’s citizens, and

Whereas, Seeking to throw off this wretched yoke and be a beacon of freedom for the enchained masses of this country,

Therefore Be It Resolved, That the Commonwealth of Massachusetts hereby dissolves its political bands with the United States of America and shall hereafter exist as a free and independent state.

While this resolution is counterfactual, it has been imagined from a genuine context.  During the antebellum period, especially after the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act, many abolitionists perceived the Union as an albatross that enmeshed their states in the enslavement they loathed.  Supreme Court decisions such as Ableman v. Booth (upholding the Fugitive Slave Act) amplified their antipathy to the constitutional order.

William Lloyd Garrison was the Northern disunionist par excellence.  The editor of The Liberator placed “No Union with Slaveholders!” on the publication’s masthead since he considered Northern withdrawal not only permissive but imperative.  “Give us Disunion and liberty and a good conscience, rather than Union with slavery and moral degradation,” he wrote in the wake of the Dred Scott decision.

Continue reading

From Mises.org, here.

כיצד להתמודד עם יסורים

חכמה בינה ודעת| הרב שלום ארוש שליט”א

Published on Dec 15, 2016

הדבר העיקרי שקובע איך יראו החיים של האדם זה הדעת , לכן כל אחד שרוצה לראות שינויים לטובה בכל תחומי החיים צריך להגדיל את הדעת שלו אבל איך עושים את זה?

From YouTube, here.

הלוא אם תיטיב שאת!

כנפי רוח – הגירסה של יוסף קרדונר

Published on Dec 3, 2015

יוסף קרדונר בהופעה אישית בסוכה – תשע”ה
מילות השיר:
בן אדם, עלה, למעלה עלה
עלה למעלה, עלה בן אדם
עלה, למעלה עלה
כִּי כֹּחַ עַז לָךְ
יֵשׁ לָךְ כְּנָפִי רוּחַ,
כְּנָפִי נְשָׁרִים אַבִּירִים.
אֶל תכחש בָּם
פֶּן יכחשו לְךָ.
דּרושׁ אוֹתָם –
דרוש בן אדם
ויימצאו לך מיד.

(לחן: אביגיל עוזיאל-עמר)
מילים : הרב קוק זצ”ל

From YouTube, here.