ללא מחבר No Author

אשרי הדור שהגדולים נשמעים לקטנים

לכבוד מרן, גדול הדור, רבי זכריה בן אבקולס

“העולם אומרים, אם צדיק עשה עוולה-אז הוא “אויס צדיק”

ואני אומר: הצדיק נשאר צדיק, אבל הוא עשה עוולה”

(חיי מוהרן)

מימיי תמהתי, מה טעם גילגל עליך רבי יוחנן את האישום  “ענוותנותו של רבי זכריה בן אבקולס החריבה את ביתנו, שרפה את היכלנו והגליתנו מארצנו”? הרי אינך יחידי בסיפור! העשיר שהלבין את פניו של בר קמצא וגירש אותו מהסעודה-כן בסדר? ובר קמצא עצמו שהלך ומסר מלשינות על כלל ישראל-כן בסדר? ו”רבנן דהוו תמן אשתיקו”-כן בסדר?

אז למה דווקא אתה? שמעתי הרבה תשובות, אבל אגיד לך מה דעתי הקטנה.

במדרש איכה ישנה גירסה אחרת לסיפור. במקום “הוו תמן רבנן ושתקי” – “הוה תמן רבי זכריה בן אבקולס ושתיק”.

זה משנה את כל התמונה. מרן.

עשית טעות אחת כאשר שתקת מול הלבנת הפנים של בר קמצא (מהרש”א טוען שהיית מקורב ל”אינשי דלא מעלי” של אותו דור. האם זה נכון?) ואז נותן לך השם ית’ הזדמנות לתקן את הטעות: קום והקרב את העגל בעל מום שהביא בר קמצא מהקיסר!

איי,זה לא מתאים ל”פרומקייט” שלך? נו,אז תצום אחר כך ארבעים יום, תעשה גלגולי שלג,תבקש מ”קופת העיר” שיתפללו עליך ארבעים יום בציונו הק’ של התנא קמא. ווטאבר.(“מאי תקנתיה? ליתיב תענית לתעניתיה”) אבל את הקרבן הזה אתה חייב להקריב!

לא הקרבת? כעת נכנסת לחיוב הלכתי לחסל את בר קמצא! “מוייסר”!

“ואם שלש אלה לא יעשה לה”-אז בוודאי ובוודאי נפל עליך כל התיק. מנהיגות פירושה,קודם כל,ליזום ולא רק לתת “ברקסים” על כל צעד ושעל. אם אתה אינך מסוגל להתמודד-זה בסדר, אבל אל תעצור ואל תפריע למי שכן מתמודד בדרכו שלו.

_  _  _

חייב אני להביא שתי דוגמאות, מרן, אם לא עבורך, לפחות עבור משב”קיך וגיחזיך היקרים.

1.במשך שנים רבות טרח ויגע הרב יעקב יוסף על נושא האפליות בסמינרים, לבד. אף רב ואף מרן לא עזר לו. מתי נזכרו לדבר איתו? רק אחרי הבגץ בעמנואל! וגם זה-לא ממש כדי לחסל את הנגע, אלא רק כדי שימשוך את העתירה. איפה הייתם עד אז?

2.ישנו משבר כלכלי בכוללים, זה לא סוד, וזה רק הולך ומעמיק. לצערי הרב-מגיעים מכיוונך מסרים של אי לגיטימציה למסלולי הכשרה מקצועית, שלילה של שירות צבאי לצרכי פרנסה, וכעת גם בזיונות בפועל:”חרדקים”! איזו אלטרנטיבה לפרנסה כן לגיטימית לדעתך, מרן?

_ _ _

כבודו, כמנהג חסידים אקנח בסיפור. קצר וחריף כלגימת וודקה.

(תזמורת! “ארבע בבות” פליז!)

כשהרב בעל ה”תניא” נלקח למאסר הידוע (ממנו השתחרר בי”ט כסלו) הוא שאל את אחד החסידים המסורים לו ביותר-ר’ שמואל מונקיס-“מה יהא בסופי?”

ענה לו ר’ שמואל:”אם אתה באמת רבי, וכל מעשיך אך ורק לשם שמים, אתה תצא בשלום כמובן. אבל אם משהו אינו נקי אצלך-מגיע לך לשבת במאסר! להרבה יהודים קלקלת את התענוג מהעולם הזה!”

כבוד מרן שליט”א. בבקשה-אל תכעס עלי. הייתי שמח לומר לך את כל זה בארבע עיניים, אבל משב”קיך וגיחזיך –כבר מזמן לא נותנים לי להיכנס. אני סמוך ובטוח שהם עוד יעבירו לך את המסר, בשביל מה יש להם סמארטפונים ואינטרנט?

מתוך פורום בחדרי חרדים, כאן.

If He Hollers, Tax Him More

The Tax Poem

by Author Unknown

Tax his land, tax his wage,
Tax his bed in which he lays.
Tax his tractor, tax his mule,
Teach him taxes is the rule.

Tax his cow, tax his goat,
Tax his pants, tax his coat.
Tax his ties, tax his shirts,
Tax his work, tax his dirt.

Tax his chew, tax his smoke,
Teach him taxes are no joke.
Tax his car, tax his grass,
Tax the roads he must pass.

Tax his food, tax his drink,
Tax him if he tries to think.
Tax his sodas, tax his beers,
If he cries, tax his tears.

Tax his bills, tax his gas,
Tax his notes, tax his cash.
Tax him good and let him know
That after taxes, he has no dough.

If he hollers, tax him more,
Tax him until he’s good and sore.
Tax his coffin, tax his grave,
Tax the sod in which he lays.

Put these words upon his tomb,
“Taxes drove me to my doom!”
And when he’s gone, we won’t relax,
We’ll still be after the inheritance tax.

From Your Daily Poem, here.

The Stupidity Tax

The Lottery: A Monopoly Upon State Malevolence

By

March 30, 2010

If you hang around your local gas station or food mart long enough, a scruffy-looking man will toddle in the door and request $25.00 of gas on pump nine, a pack of Camels Lights, one mega-million card and three of your dollar scratchers. He will then proceed to scratch the tickets as his gas pumps, only to return with a $2.00 winner that he would like to exchange for two more tickets. He will proceed to scratch the tickets again, discard them in the trash, and leave. You will not see this man again until next payday.

Gambling is a moron’s retirement plan, and it is certainly not our positive obligations to help morons. Yet, unlike the casinos, what is it about state lotteries that make these acts so contemptible?

By means of mandatory K-12 drill-and-kill public education, the state ill-educates the public into a pool of mathematical ignorance. Most high school students graduate without a single course in probability/statistics. Sure, in seventh grade they learn about the probability of pulling an ace out of a deck of cards, but permutations and combinations like that needed to calculate the odds of winning the mega-millionaire jackpot is only taught to the top percentile of high school students, which is usually recommended as an elective, not as a course of learning.

How convenient.

The state not only promotes the public’s ignorance in probabilities but then maximizes that ignorance via a monopoly on gambling.

Thus, simple equations like the one below are foreign to the majority of the populace.

Not only is the math foreign, but even the term “your odds of winning” is foreign to most individuals. What does 1 out of 80 million even denote to the average citizen?

Let us translate this into something more tangible that common individuals can comprehend.

Here is a penny

If this penny represents the chance of you winning the mega-lottery jackpot, then here is how many pennies you must choose from.

(See The Mega Penny Project)

Yet, you will find nothing of this nature on the lottery websites or the back of the cards. Instead you will find this:

LOTTERY

TYPE

Odds 1 Chance in:

US PowerBall

5/45 + 1/42

80,089,128

US The Big Game

5/50 + 1/36

76,275,360

(According to The Lottery Site)

Again, I am not highlighting that casinos and other private gambling venues should highlight such depictions of probability, but at least these private institutions are upfront about their self-indulgence. The state, however, promotes such ignorance from their constituents under the veil of moral good. States will even advertise the various “good things” it does with its lotto earnings (like promoting more public education or other state funding), while all along it’s the impoverished saps that keep giving away their money.

But whose money are they giving away?

What percentage of transfer payments like welfare, unemployment, disability or social security simply returns to the state via the “stupid tax”? More bluntly, what percentages of OUR paychecks are being given away?

Now, maybe the naysayer will argue that state gambling is indeed evil, but deregulated gambling would lead to even higher improbabilities of losing, and thus why we should outlaw gambling all together?

I don’t believe this to be true.

Sidestepping the issue that no one has the moral authority to assert what others may or may not do with their own money, competition in gambling would actually lead to higher probabilities of winning or some other form of payout. For example, casinos litter their hotels with free festivities and offerings so that consumers feel as though they are getting something for their money. Consumers may travel to Vegas, blow one month’s pay, and still have a great time. Casinos offer these extras not out of the good of their hearts, but because of the competition with other casinos.

When is the last time the state lottery offered such extras? Sure, you may write the losses off your income taxes (as if they actually own the income they tax) but that’s it! At least I can be sure that under a private lottery I would get some free gas, coffee, Reese Cups or some other kickback from the convenience store from which I bought the lottery ticket. If not, I will buy his competitors ticket.

Therefore, let us return one more time to the convenience of our malevolent state-controlled lottery. The state may choose what math is important for study, exploit that ignorance in mathematics, and veil its racketeering under the label of social good all from the comforts of its monopoly.

March 30, 2010

From Lewrockwell.com, here.

Lechem Hapanim Reenactment and Repast

The Temple Showbread (Lechem Hapanim) Revived

Raphael Morris’s interests in Temple Mount and in Baking (he’s a professional baker) combined recently, in a Temple Institute project to re-enact the preparation and ceremony of the “show bread” (Lechem Hapanim) – perhaps for the first time since the destruction of the Temple 2000 years ago.

Raphael explained that The Temple Institute decided to dress some Cohanim (descendants from the Priests) in the reconstructed Priestly garments which the Institute has painstakingly made as closely as possible to the original Priestly Garments of the Tabernacle and Temple.

Rav Baruch Kahana, The Institute’s rabbinical authority advised them that rather than do this as an isolated event, they should have the Cohanim wearing these garments as a part of a bigger event. As I understand it, similarly to the rules concerning taking a Sefer Torah out of the Ark, this should only be done for a purpose, such as to read it, rather than out of curiosity.

The Institute decided that an appropriate ceremony to re-enact, with the Cohanim wearing their priestly garments, was the ceremony of the showbreads.

In the time of the Tabernacle and Temple, the showbread was baked once a week, and the Cohanim ceremonially replaced the old bread on the Table (shulchan) with the new bread.

Raphael with freshly baked Show Bread

The Institute decided to hold a reenactment of the Showbread ceremony, at the Old City Community Center, on Tu B’Shvat.

To the best of their knowledge, this has not been done since the Temple was destroyed.

A member of the Temple Institute team of experts researched what is known about the preparation of the showbread and guided the volunteers how to practically prepare the bread.

In the Tabernacle, there were 12 show bread loaves, replacing the week-old 12 breads. So for a full reconstruction reconstruction, 24 loaves were required.

According to the research, each showbread loaf was made from approx 4kg of coarse wheat flour, resulting in some 6kg of dough. This, multiplied by 24, equals 144 kg of dough.

Furthermore, the loaves themselves were large, some 60cm long by 40cm wide, and 8cm thick, with ‘walls’ of 10 cm at the two ends, to make a “chet” shape.

The Institute decided that the showbread should be kneaded for 40 minutes and baked for 40 minutes (considerably longer than the 18 minutes for matzo). In a one-loaf capacity kneading machine and oven, this would therefore require 16 hours of continuous production.

Raphael obtained the permission of the owner of the bakery where he works in Hod Hasharon to use their commercial oven, with capacity for six loaves. And the Institute rented a commercial scale kneading machine.

Show Breads cooling off in the bakery

The Institute was concerned that large quantities of ‘showbread’ would be left to waste, and so they decided to cut back the project to 12 loaves, enough for a full Table.

Raphael took over the bakery for an all-night session, working solo, and he kneaded and baked the loaves. He used standard aluminum pans as a mold for the ‘walls’ of the breads.

There was no way to check the texture of the inside of the bread, so Raphael worked from instinct.
They came out crusty on the outside and fluffy inside.

Continue reading…
From Tzedek-Tzedek, here.