Education

Each Little Lamb

By: Rabbi Shalom Arush

An educator must conduct himself like a merciful shepherd, worrying about the needs of each little lamb. Moses was attentive to the weak lambs in his flock, ensuring that they ate the soft grass before the stronger sheep entered the pasture. He would fence in the mature sheep until the lambs had eaten, leaving them the stiffer grass. So did King David. That’s why Hashem made them the leaders – and chief educators – of the Jewish People.

In the same way, an educator must provide each child with what he needs. He must separate certain children from those who are a bad influence on them and pair together those who would benefit from each other’s friendship, like a loyal shepherd.

Every educator should have a daily prayer that he says for the children whom he is teaching. He should know their full names for prayers and pray for them daily, beseeching G-d to show him how to relate to each and every one of them according to the needs of their unique souls. This reflects King Solomon’s teaching, “Educate the child according to his own inclinations.” Uniform methods might work for the Marine Corps but they don’t work in child education. Each child needs a different approach. Sounds impossible? Who said that child education is easy? The responsibility is prodigious. The educator must tend to the special souls that The Almighty has entrusted in his hands for safe-keeping. Success in this endeavor requires endless prayers.

If the educator will do his utmost, as above, then even if he doesn’t succeed with the child, Heaven will not hold him responsible, for he has done everything humanly possible. G-d does not demand more than what a human being is capable of doing; He’s fully aware of our limitations.

These are the two principles that one must remember well when educating Hashem’s “holy flocks”:

First, every effort and attempt that a teacher makes earns priceless rewards. Every positive life lesson that he merits to instill in his young pupils guarantees his place in the World to Come.

Second, the teacher carries the tremendous responsibility to avoid mistakes or failures when dealing with tender souls. One highly respected educator said, “In other types of work, failure might cause monetary damage; but failure in education can trample a soul.”

An educator should always avoid stern measures, such as punishments and suspension, as much as possible. He must devote maximum effort to educating in a positive and enjoyable way with prayer, songs, stories and prizes. In addition, he should not hesitate to enlist as much outside help as necessary from experienced educators and colleagues, parents of the children and whoever else is relevant. He should never look for the easy or quick solution, for he is dealing with delicate souls. It is easy for the educator to eject the disruptive child from the classroom but no one knows what might happen to the ejected child.

Some children are very active. It’s hard for them to sit still and not disrupt the class. In most cases, the school will demand that the child take Ritalin because they do not want to work hard with this soul.

True, it’s not easy to deal with a hyperactive child. But with sincere effort and combined forces with the parents – accompanied by much prayer and including a commitment from the parents that they will pray for their child for five minutes daily – the child’s problems can be solved without Ritalin.

Many leading educators believe that the problems of these hyperactive children can be solved with a lot of attention, warmth and love – particularly from the parents – and of course, extensive prayer. Do not look for the easy way out and drug the child. Do not paralyze him!

One of the greatest educators of this generation related that she had a hyperactive child. It was very difficult to raise him, but she did not give up; she showered him with attention, warmth and emotional support. Today he is the father of a beautiful family and a Rosh Yeshiva of one of the largest yeshivas in Israel. He does massive outreach work and is unbelievably active, sleeping only two hours a night. All of this is a direct result of his parents’ love and faith in him. This allowed him to channel his hyper-activity in a positive way.

The so-called solution of giving the child a ‘sedative’ puts him in danger throughout his life. When he is older, he may become accustomed to taking drugs every time he experiences difficulty, leading to drug addiction or alcoholism, G-d forbid.

Another important point for educators: It is true that there is always pressure from the administration to cover learning material. But one must always remember priorities. The goal of education is to instill good character traits in our children and pupils: ethics, love of Torah and love of their fellow human beings. With this in our focus, Hashem will surely help us in this hallowed task.

From Breslev Israel, here.

Moshe Feiglin on the Statist Mindset

Should Israel Legalize Gambling? By Moshe Feiglin

Should the State of Israel legalize gambling? Should it allow the proposed construction of casinos in Eilat? The question should really be, by what right does the State prohibit gambling?

For some people, the State is the great purifier. If the State gives the order to expel a person from his home and to destroy it, the act becomes ethical and one must carry out the order (for if not, “the roof will cave in upon us and the State will be destroyed”). In other words, the State bestowed its seal of morality on the unethical order. This is also known as fascism.

If the State  prohibits the use of cannabis, then it must surely be true that there is something very unethical about smoking it. If the State arrests and tortures minors and does not bring them to trial, then clearly those minors are sons of the devil himself. And it is a good thing that they are torturing them. And if they confessed as a result of the torture, it shows that we were right all along. If the State organizes gambling and calls it the State lottery, then that is good gambling. But if a private individual organizes it, that is bad gambling. If I peek into your bank account, I am a criminal. But if the State does it, that is perfectly fine.

French psychologist Jean Piaget took note of this phenomenon. During World War II, the German movie theatres would show pictures from the concentration camps. The horrors plainly apparent on the screen did not convince the obedient German citizens that the State was perpetrating evil. Instead, they concluded that if the State was punishing the Jews so severely, they must certainly be monsters… That is what happens when the State becomes an ethical measuring stick, attempting to replace G-d.

Besides providing security and establishing a justice system (according to Maimonides) the role of the State is basically not to get in the way. Laws are not supposed to create culture. They are supposed to express it. It is the citizens who create culture. I believe that Jewish culture and authentic Jewish identity will only develop in Israel through absolute liberty, because liberty is one of our national values. It is in our collective “I”. Just like Michelangelo’s ‘David’ was already in the rock. It was the liberty of the artist that revealed the iconic sculpture.

The State must not interfere in the private lives and values of its citizens – except for extreme cases when there is a clear consensus around a particular value.

There is such an ‘animal’ that is called the values of the nation. There is a collective “I” somewhere there in the rock. A person who walks down the street with no clothing offends that “I”, who also has rights. It is fine to obligate a motorcyclist to wear a helmet (even though he endangers only himself by not wearing it) because the value of preservation of human life in our Land encompasses much more than any incidental majority that can legislate laws to balance various interests.

Even if we do not entertain the question of its influence on its surroundings (let us assume that we can completely neutralize all the negative side effects of gambling) gambling is very bad from an ethical standpoint. All gambling is bad – the State lotteries are just the same as private gambling. But the question is if this is a value of the Nation or my personal feeling.

If 80-85% of the community (in Eilat or any other place) opposes gambling, that is a critical mass that would enable them to prohibit gambling in their city. If we are not dealing with those numbers, the State does not have to allow gambling. It must simply not prohibit it.

From Manhigut Yehudit. [Site defunct]

Monarchy and the Mount

Politics, Prayer and Sovereignty: A Torah Thought for Parashat Tetzaveh by Moshe Feiglin

43 And there I will meet with the children of Israel; and [the Tent] shall be sanctified by My glory.
44 And I will sanctify the tent of meeting, and the altar; Aaron also and his sons will I sanctify, to minister to Me in the priest’s office.
45 And I will dwell among the children of Israel, and will be their God.
46 And they shall know that I am the LORD their God, that brought them forth out of the land of Egypt, that I may dwell among them. I am the LORD their God.   (From this week’s Torah portion, Tetzaveh, Exodus 29)

Driving home one night last week after a meeting and lecture with English speaking university students, I searched for a radio station to keep me awake. Much to my surprise, Israel Radio Channel 2 had dedicated an hour to the topic of the Holy Temple. I stayed with them, of course.

The broadcasters were of the opinion that the Temple Mount and Holy Temple are the pre-eminent spiritual center for all humanity and as such, nothing that smacks of sovereignty should be allowed at the site. Two interviewees also joined the conversation. One was veteran Temple Mount activist Rabbi Yehudah Glick and the other was an Israeli Moslem intellectual (who also translated the Koran into Hebrew) whose name I do not remember.

First, the broadcasters turned to Rabbi Glick in an attempt to extricate from him his agreement to surrender Israeli sovereignty on the Mount. He refused, of course, to adopt the Channel 2 approach, but he did not directly address the claim that negates the integration of territorial sovereignty with universal spirituality.

Next, the Moslem intellectual was interviewed. As opposed to Rabbi Glick, he spoke in the most direct of terms. No Jews, or any other nation, for that matter, have any right whatsoever on the Temple Mount – and not at the Western Wall either, he explained. The entire area, according to him, belongs to Islam.

“We are not talking politics,” begged the broadcasters. “We are talking about spirituality. Don’t you want to see the Jews also praying at the holy site?” Again and again, the broadcasters attempted to extricate from him a hint of separation between politics and spirituality, but for naught.

I found myself laughing at their attempts as I drove along the dark road. The Channel 2 broadcasters with their Western, Christianity-based mentality are incapable of integrating the connection between the holy and the mundane; between the physical and the metaphysical. For them, holiness is absolute (like a Catholic priest who does not marry and connect to life). Their Moslem interviewee absolutely does not understand them. For him, prayer and politics, prayer and sovereignty – are one and the same.

Both sides have severed the connection between the material and the spiritual, the body and the soul. Neither side can be truly connected to the Temple Mount. For the site of the Holy Temple is where the metaphysical touches the physical. Just as it is impossible to bring children to the world by correspondence, so it is impossible to coronate G-d as King without a nation and sovereignty. And there I will meet with the children of Israel; and [the Tent] shall be sanctified by My glory.

The Holy Temple is the tool necessary for the coronation of the Creator of the world over His universe. There is no king without a nation, without a country, without a capital and without a palace. Other nations of the world coronate human kings, enter into servitude for people who are mere flesh and blood and build them grand palaces. But for Israel, the majesty is G-d’s and the Holy Temple is His earthly abode.

This is how liberty is acquired for the Nation and the world. Not one person enslaved to the next. Instead, we are all servants of G-d, exclusively. The first to be enslaved to Him is the human king of Israel, whose entire purpose is the fulfillment of the destiny of the Nation of Israel – to perfect the world in the Kingdom of Heaven.

Shabbat Shalom,
Moshe Feiglin

(Illustration courtesy of The Temple Institute)

From Manhigut Yehudit [Defunct].