Segula: Saying Parshas Haman With Targum – EVERY DAY (On the Mistake’s Origin)

The Big Mistake

Friday, January 14, 2022

THE ג’ בשלח MISTAKE
The popular Minhag of פרשת המן on ג’ בשלח was unheard of just one generation ago. Not even  Riminover Chasidim of the past ever heard of it.
In all of the כתבים of R. Mendel Riminover Zt”l there is no mention of the ג’ בשלח סגולה
The first מקור (source) of this Minhag is in the ספר ילקוט מנחם חדש published in 1991. The Sefer writes that Rav S.W. Weinberger Zt”l heard from the Stropkover Rebbe Zt”l in the name of R.M.Riminov Zt”l  about the ג’ בשלח פרשת המן סגולה
After the publication of the Sefer, this Segulah spread like wildfire. All the weekly Torah pamphlets & every frum internet site and App. reminded us not to forget to say פרשת המן on Tuesday בשלח.
*At a later date  Rav Weinberger’s כתבים were found in which he writes that  he heard from  the Stropkover Rebbe how R,M, Riminover said פרשת המן, שנים מקרא ואחד תרגום EVERY DAY & had in mind that פרנסה is מן השמים. R.M.R. claimed that by having this כוונה while reciting the Parsha you are assured not to ever lack in פרנסה (As mentioned by the קדמונים)
Rav Weinberg wrote that it was on ג’ בשלח when he met the Stropkover Rebbe. The confusion came about from this one line that he heard about this סגולה on ג’ בשלח from the Stropkover Rebbe R.M.M. never said that there is a special day of ג’ בשלח to say the פרשת המן

הגאולה לא מגיעה בכפיה נגד הרצון

לא בכפיה | רק הרוצים בגאולה מגיעים אל היעד

מות סרבני הגאולה במצרים • מות הסרבנים במדבר • מות סרבני הגאולה לפני הגאולה השלישית: וּבָרוֹתִי מִכֶּם הַמֹּרְדִים וְהַפּוֹשְׁעִים בִּי, מֵאֶרֶץ מְגוּרֵיהֶם אוֹצִיא אוֹתָם, וְאֶל אַדְמַת יִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא יָבוֹא • הקדוש ברוך הוא לא כופה על אף אדם להיגאל נגד רצונו • כדי להיגאל חייבים רצון שלנו • יהי רצון שנעשה את המוטל עלינו וניגאל בקרוב • הרב יצחק ברנד • פרשת בא בבית המדרש בהר הבית

Jan 25, 2023

מאתר יוטיוב, כאן.

האמת היחידה שאפשר לשמוע מפוליטיקאים היא בהאשמות הדדיות

טלי גוטליב לח”כ מיש עתיד: “בתור שוטר אתה יודע איך אתם תופרים תיקים”

חברת הכנסת מהליכוד, טלי גוטליב, תקפה את ניצב בדימוס יואב סגלוביץ’ מיש עתיד, לאחר שהעיר בכנסת בנוגע לכתבי האישום ולמשפט המתנהל נגד רה”מ בנימין נתניהו: “אוי לבן אדם שסימנתם, יש לכם כוח בלתי מבוקר”

מעריב אונליין 24/01/2023 

חברת הכנסת ממפלגת הליכוד טלי גוטליב תקפה היום (שלישי) את ניצב בדימוס, ח”כ יואב סגלוביץ’ מיש עתיד, תוך שהיא מתייחסת לעברו המקצועי, זאת לאחר שהעיר הערה בנוגע לכתבי האישום והמשפט המתנהל בימים אלה נגד ראש הממשלה בנימין נתניהו.

“אתה יודע בתור שוטר איך אתם יודעים לתפור תיקים אם אתם רק רוצים – יש לכם כוח בלתי מרוסן, בלתי מבוקר, כשאתם מסמנים מטרה – אוי לבן אדם שסימנתם”, תקפה גוטליב.

מאתר מעריב, כאן.

‘Conspiracy Theory’ Means Any Alternative View to That of the American Empire

While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition.

A “conspiracy theory” no longer means an event explained by a conspiracy.  Instead, it now means any explanation, or even a fact, that is out of step with the government’s explanation and that of its media pimps.

For example, online news broadcasts of RT have been equated with conspiracy theories by the New York Times simply because RT reports news and opinions that the New York Times does not report and the US government does not endorse.

In other words, as truth becomes uncomfortable for government and its Ministry of Propaganda, truth is redefined as conspiracy theory, by which is meant an absurd and laughable explanation that we should ignore.

When piles of carefully researched books, released government documents, and testimony of eye witnesses made it clear that Oswald was not President John F. Kennedy’s assassin, the voluminous research, government documents, and verified testimony was dismissed as “conspiracy theory.”

In other words, the truth of the event was unacceptable to the authorities and to the Ministry of Propaganda that represents the interests of authorities.

The purest example of how Americans are shielded from truth is the media’s (including many Internet sites’) response to the large number of professionals who find the official explanation of September 11, 2001, inconsistent with everything they, as experts, know about physics, chemistry, structural engineering, architecture, fires, structural damage, the piloting of airplanes, the security procedures of the United States, NORAD’s capabilities, air traffic control, airport security, and other matters.  These experts, numbering in the thousands, have been shouted down by know-nothings in the media  who brand the experts as “conspiracy theorists.”

This despite the fact that the official explanation endorsed by the official media is the most extravagant conspiracy theory in human history.

Let’s take a minute to re-acquaint ourselves with the official explanation, which is not regarded as a conspiracy theory despite the fact that it comprises an amazing conspiracy.  The official truth is that a handful of young Muslim Arabs who could not fly airplanes, mainly Saudi Arabians who came neither from Iraq nor from Afghanistan, outwitted not only the CIA and the FBI, but also all 16  US intelligence agencies and all intelligence agencies of US allies including Israel’s Mossad, which is believed to have penetrated every terrorist organization and which carries out assassinations of those whom Mossad marks as terrorists.

In addition to outwitting every intelligence agency of the United States and its allies, the handful of young Saudi Arabians outwitted the National Security Council, the State Department, NORAD, airport security four times in the same hour on the same morning,  air traffic control, caused the US Air Force to be unable to launch interceptor aircraft,  and caused three well-built steel-structured buildings, including one not hit by an airplane, to fail suddenly in a few seconds as a result of limited structural damage and small, short-lived, low-temperature fires that burned on a few floors.

The Saudi terrorists were even able to confound the laws of physics and cause WTC building seven to collapse at free fall speed for several seconds, a physical impossibility in the absence of explosives used in controlled demolition.

The story that the government and the media have told us amounts to a gigantic conspiracy, really a script for a James Bond film. Yet, anyone who doubts this improbable conspiracy theory is defined into irrelevance by the obedient media.

Anyone who believes an architect, structural engineer, or demolition expert who says that the videos show that the buildings are blowing up, not falling down, anyone who believes a Ph.D. physicist who says that the official explanation is inconsistent with known laws of physics, anyone who believes expert pilots who testify that non-pilots or poorly-qualified pilots cannot fly airplanes in such maneuvers, anyone who believes the 100 or more first responders who testify that they not only heard explosions in the towers but personally experienced explosions, anyone who believes University of Copenhagen nano-chemist Niels Harrit who reports finding unreacted nano-thermite in dust samples from the WTC towers, anyone who is convinced by experts instead of by propaganda is dismissed as a kook.

In America today, and increasingly throughout the Western world, actual facts and true explanations have been relegated to the realm of kookiness.  Only people who believe lies are socially approved and accepted as patriotic citizens.

Indeed, a writer or newscaster is not even permitted to report the findings of 9/11 skeptics.  In other words, simply to report Professor Harrit’s findings now means that you endorse them or agree with them.  Everyone in the US print and TV media knows that he/she will be instantly fired if they report Harrit’s findings, even with a laugh. Thus, although Harrit has reported his findings on European television and has lectured widely on his findings in Canadian universities, the fact that he and the international scientific research team that he led found unreacted nano-thermite in the WTC dust and have offered samples to other scientists to examine has to my knowledge never been reported in the American media.

Continue reading here…

From Global Research, here.