The argument for decriminalizing nonviolent alternatives to government services is always the same unbeatable ‘Mimah Nafshach’ (technical or ethical)?
- If the government program in question is doing such a splendid job, why need it fear competition from nongovernmental alternatives?
- And if the government program in question is not doing such a good job, why should anyone object to its replacement?
(Based on a quote from Milton Friedman)