Javier Milei on the Connection Between Peace and Prosperity

From an interview in the paywalled “Economist” (sent by a reader, not checked inside):

Where you give way to freedom, society flourishes. Not only economically, but it flourishes also in social aspects. There is a phrase by [Frédéric] Bastiat that is wonderful, which says: “Where commerce enters, bullets do not enter.”

And there is another wonderful phrase that is by Bertrand de Jouvenel who says: “Where there is a market, manners are sweet.”

Notes: I don’t get the impression Mr. Milei understands the full implications of the freedom philosophy for foreign policy. He’s no Ron Paul, to put it lightly. Why does he support school vouchers? And I don’t see him seeking advice (dogs aside).

(I’ll admit, I’m quoting him because it’s far easier than carefully checking Bastiat and Bertrand de Jouvenel in the original!)


By the way, here is a Gemara that might be hinting at the same idea, Berachos 57a:

אמר רבי חייא בר אבא הרואה חטים בחלום ראה שלום שנאמר השם גבולך שלום חלב חטים ישביעך.

And see this title.

Was Sarah Schenirer’s School Immediately Accepted by the Rabbis? Doubts Arise…

Quoting from an article by Chevy Weiss on Tzofiya:

Schenirer’s brother wrote a note to the Belzer Rebbe11 requesting a blessing for her plan to “educate Jewish daughters in the Jewish way.” With his response of “be blessed and successful”, she launched a school; however, it is speculated that the Rebbe did not understand the vagueness of the note as he prohibited his followers from enrolling12. She worked hard and slowly gained support around Europe, although it took several years of high assimilation rates until other Orthodox Rabbinic leaders endorsed her schools, including Rav Chaim Ozer Grodzinski (1928), the Gerrer Rebbe, Rabbi Avraham Meir Alter of Gur (1929), the Chafetz Chaim, Rav Yisrael Meir HaKohain (1933), and the Lubavitcher Rebbe (1934)13.

 

Footnotes:

11 Rav Issacher Dov of Belz, 1854–1927.

12 Weissman & Seidman, 2021.

13 Ginsparg-Klein, Leslie. “Sarah Schenirer and Innovative Change: The Myths and Facts – the Lehrhaus.” 12 Nov. 2019.

End of excerpt.


By the way, what is Tzofiya?

From the About page:

As opposed to other existing websites who seek to offer women a different perspective, Tzofia is faithful to Halakha, Orthodox Judaism and Daat Torah. It is headed by Dayan Shlomo Cohen, graduate of The Institute of Monetary Law and Yeshivat Hanegev, and an esteemed teacher at Neve Yerushalayim, a well-known Jerusalem-based seminary for women.

VAYISHLACH: A Homiletic Warning About Sudden Large Fortunes

You know the homiletic lesson mentioned by Iggeres Teiman to bear Yishmael’s insults in silence: ומשמע ודומה ומשא (Hear it, Be still, Bear it)?

Well, in Se’ir’s family tree, we read (Bereishis 36:27):

אלה בני אצר: בלהן וזעון ועקן.

  • Don’t pray to win the lottery (אוצר)!
  • “If it sounds too good to be true…”
  • And so on.

(I don’t know if I actually came up with this (Sefardic blood?), or simply forgot my source.)


P.S., Ohr Hachaim there quotes a similar Medrash:

אלה בני אצר וגו’. ירמוז הכתוב על דרך אומרם ז”ל (ילקוט משלי ב’) אמרה תורה מפני מה בני עניים אמר לה הקדוש ברוך הוא להנחיל אוהבי יש ואוצרותיהם אמלא פירוש כי באמצעות יסוריהן בעולם הזה ירבה אוצרם בעולם הבא, והוא אומרו אלה בני אצר פי’ אותם שחפצים לאצור אוצר בטוב בנצחי צריכין בעולם הזה לסבול יסורין. בלהן וגו’, ומודיע הכתוב כי היסורין הם עושים אוצרות מלאים כל טוב למעלה באמצעותם. וכיסורי ר’ אלעזר ב”ר שמעון בר יוחאי (בבא מציעא דף פד:) שהיה קורא אותם בואו אחי וגו’, ומעתה מי האיש החפץ חיים העליונים ולאצור אוצרות הטוב ימאוס בעולם הזה ובתענוגיו ויקבל עליו בלהן וזעון ועקן תרגום צרה עקא לטוב לו כל הימים ולמלאות אוצרותיו.

An Apt Vort From the Chasam Sofer for Our Time

So, I was browsing Sifrei Minim the other day…

What?! How dare you…

Excuse me. Specifically Rabbi Yoel Teitelbaum’s “Al Hageula Ve’al Hatemura“.

Right.

Anyway, on the last page, (engaged in the useful conflation of Jewish autonomy and statehood,) the Satmar screed paraphrases the following homily from the Chasam Sofer.

Here is the original:

והנה אחד מזמני הגאולה היותר בטוחים הוא בהיות ישראל בתכלית השפלות שאין למטה ממנו אזי על כרחך יביט פני משיחו למשחו שמן משחת קודש, ובמה יודע איפה שפלת בני ישראל הוא בראות אלקים את מגינם אשר יבטחו בו אזי יראה ה’ כמה מהשיעור שפלות הגיעו שאין למטה ממנו. וזה שאמר קרא מגיננו ראה אלקים אותו המגין שאנו חסים בצילו וע”י זה והבט פני משיחך הבטה לטובה ולשנת גאולה.

(חתם סופר דרוש לח’ תמוז תקס”ט)

Amen!

Here is a screenshot for more context:

Of course, he immediately engages in a knee-jerk Yeridas Hadoros Kal Vachomer to the wars of the State of Israel, as if he knew history any better than he knew current events.

Rabbi Teitelbaum’s interjection:

ואמר זה החת”ס זלה”ה בדורו, ואנן מה נענין אבתרי’ בירידה הנוראה שאין לה דמיון וערך לדור שלפנינו…

It’s Satmar. You expect some form of “נורא” to show up in every third sentence! I’m sure that reading this stuff ruins my Hebrew, not to mention my neshama.

[Think: “I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy“. (John Adams)]

Ha! Where was I, again?

Not sure…

Thank you. So, no thanks to Satmar, but I do think the Chasam Sofer vertel applies well to our situation. We Want Mashiach Now!

Um, wait. Are you…

Oh, you know what I mean!

MAY HE ROT: Personification of the Evil American Empire, Hen Kissinger

The excellent ending of a Huffington Post article on the wicked man:

That his influence never waned makes it easy to see Kissinger’s fingerprints on every ill — or accomplishment, as his acolytes would frame them — that followed. There’s probably some truth, too, to the idea that Kissinger maintained that influence in large part to help ensure his place in history as America’s most significant foreign policy mind, no matter who wrote it.

The United States, after all, overthrew numerous democratically elected governments, waged secret bombing campaigns, and committed and permitted human rights abuses well before Kissinger came to power. And the U.S. government has carried out decades of endless war that have resulted in significant civilian death tolls, the expanded use of torture, indefinite detention, illegal rendition and extrajudicial murder since Kissinger left government.

Much like Kissinger, the architects of those disasters faced few, if any, meaningful repercussions. A country that so often predicates its concern for human rights on the specific humans in question, and in which elite accountability for even the most blatant crimes and abuses is so rare, seems to have made up its mind about morality’s place in politics and public policy without much need for Kissinger’s help. He was just happier than most to provide it.

Perhaps, then, Kissinger’s life was most remarkable for how brightly it illuminated a simple and ugly truth about the nation he served.

“If all the sins of the U.S. security state can be loaded onto one man, all parties get what they need: Kissinger’s status as a world-historic figure is assured, and his critics can regard his foreign policy as the exception rather than the rule,” Meaney, the essayist, posited for The New Yorker in 2020. “It would be comforting to believe that American liberals are capable of seeing that politics is more than a matter of personal style, and that the record will prevail, but the enduring cult of Kissinger points to a less palatable possibility: Kissinger is us.”

Read the rest…