The Left Agrees: Rabbi Kahane Was Right!

How one law exposes what Israel has always tried to hide

From the moment it was established, Israel granted its Jewish citizens privileges at the expense of Palestinians. The ‘nation-state bill’ reveals the choice Israelis have to make about the future of their country.

Years ago, American journalist Ted Koppel hosted a fascinating televised debate between Rabbi Meir Kahane, the far-right anti-Arab leader, and Ehud Olmert, then a fresh-faced Knesset member from the Likud party. As the Israeli parliament is set to approve the Nation-State Law, which would enshrine discrimination against non-Jews in Israel, it is worth going back and paying close attention to the debate.

Kahane laid out his political vision without qualms. “Israelis, and especially those in power, are afraid that I will ask them the following question,” he says calmly. “Do the Arabs in Israel have the democratic right to sit quietly, democratically, and give birth to enough children to become the majority? They are afraid that I’ll ask the question. In Israel, currently, without Kahane in power, there is a law that allows Jews to receive citizenship from the mere fact that they ask for it, and that does not allow non-Jews to lease state land. Kahane did not legislate these laws. These are laws that were originally passed by the Labor Party.”

Olmert, an exceptional rhetorician, found himself stumbling to respond, retorting instead to an embarrassing discussion of chance and probability. And for good reason. Free of the shackles of political correctness and democratic veneers, Kahane was able to reveal the true face of Zionism in Israel: an inherent, perpetual demographic war against its Palestinian citizens. If Israel seeks to be Jewish and democratic, it needs to actively ensure a Jewish majority.

It is surprising therefore that it was the clause in the Nation-State Law that allows for the establishment of Jewish-only communities that has brought about so much opposition. After all, the Zionist project in Israel, since its inception, was one of re-engineering the land. This forms the basis for the state’s attitude and treatment of Palestinians — whether it is ethnic cleansing in the West Bankforbidding family reunification, the Law of Return, or the fact that since Israel’s founding, not a new single Arab town has been established, save for some Bedouin townships in the south, built to stop the Bedouin population from expanding.

Continue reading…

From 972 Mag, here.

טוב סחרה מכל סחורה

מדרש תנחומא משפטים פרק ה’:

ואלה המשפטים, זש”ה מגיד דבריו ליעקב וגו’ לא עשה כן וגו’. עקילס (נ”א אונקלוס) הגר בן אחותו של אדריאנוס היה מבקש להתגייר והיה מתירא מן אדריאנוס דודו. א”ל, אני מבקש לעשות סחורה. א”ל, שמא אתה חסר כסף וזהב, הרי אוצרותי לפניך. א”ל, אני מבקש לעשות סחורה לצאת לחוץ לידע דעת הבריות, ואני מבקש לימלך בך היאך לעשות. א”ל, כל פרקמטיא שאתה רואה שפלה ונתונה בארץ לך עסוק בה שסופה להתעלות ואת משתכר. בא לו לארץ ישראל ולמד תורה.

… א”ל, בשעה שאמרתי לך מבקש אני לעשות סחורה ואמרת לי כל פרקמטיא שאתה רואה שפלה ונתונה בארץ לך ועסוק בה שסופה להתעלות חזרתי על כל האומות ולא ראיתי שפלה נתונה בארץ כישראל וסופה להתעלות…

Chareidi Cannon Fodder in the Israeli Army – A Must Read for Tish’a Be’av

Standing with the crowd reciting Selichot at the Sanhedria cemetery recently, I got chills down my spine when the Sephardic Chazzan cried out “Anenu, Avi Yetomim Ve’Almanot”. In the context of mandatory conscription to the army and the obvious prey for sector-based (Chareidi) quotas, I could not help but be reminded of a dark segment of our people’s history. Since history repeats itself (with some variations), I took the opportunity to look up R’ Yaakov Lipshitz’s memoirs, Zichron Yaakov (Part one, Chapters 39-51), for a heart-wrenching chronicle of that period from a Jewish perspective. A must-read!
Disclaimer: There is hardly any way to compare the severity of that decree with that of today as regards the challenges facing the forcible conscripts. The association is more about who is to bear the brunt of this wretched Molech/Azazel offering.