What’s the Difference Between Mussar and Self-Development?

OK. I mean the least effective type.

Well, guess what? I found a rabbi on Torah.org who tries to answer this question.

I’ll interject a bit:

By Rabbi Ephraim D. Becker, Ph.D.

What is the difference between Mussar and other forms of personal growth?

I’ve been asked any number of times how Mussar differs from Covey, Pransky, Positive Psychology and a host of other self-improvement programs and concepts. You may find yourself asking the same question and I’d like to save you the call.

I’d say there isn’t any difference between the two.

Mussar, the Torah’s approach to personal growth has, at its most fundamental core, the call to utilize the entire physical world in the service of the transcendent, eternal world. The Torah calls upon every human being (both Jews and Gentiles in different ways) to recognize this world as the place to activate G-d’s Will through the use of the physical world of things, feelings, thoughts and actions. The Torah teaches us how to harness the material world in the service of transcendent connection to eternity.

By contrast, other forms of self-improvement are aimed at capitalizing on the transcendent aspect of a person in the service of the physical world. Being calmer, meditating, looking beyond the moment, understanding values, prioritizing and so on are all seen as tools in the pursuit of a better physical existence, whether that means a better marriage, friendships, a job or even a vacation. The point of self-improvement is to harness the transcendent world of a person in the service of his physical existence.

The difference is 180 degrees.

No, it isn’t. You’re both into “spirituality”, not religion, i.e., serving God. Otherwise, Mussar wouldn’t even have a name.

There are those self-improvement programs (notably in Eastern Religions) that have placed such a value on transcendence that they put the physical world at the service of their push for transcendence. If you push for the answer to why, the answer is because it’s a better way to live. Again, transcendence in the service of the physical world is the message.

Torah is the G-d-given recipe for being closer to Him, eternally. It is not about avoiding damnation nor is it about being redeemed from sin, though those are certainly included in the Torah recipe. Mussar is the arm of Torah that focuses on the specifics of how a physical, created, conflicted human being can transcend and utilize the limitations which are imposed by his base-physicality to become G-dlike, G-d-emulating and ever more closely attached to the pleasure of proximity to Him. The person doesn’t need to be redeemed; he needs to be activated.

Rabbi Becker is using so many words not to be cute or clear, but because he doesn’t have an answer.

Without the revelation of His Will on Mt Sinai all of the other self- improvement programs run just fine. With no directive from G-d there is nothing to do but try to improve your life here. With the revelation at Sinai the only program is Mussar. Everything else is abusing (sorry for the extreme term) spirituality in order to achieve a more blissful life in this world. Torah is about utilizing (indeed, abusing, from the perspective of one who is trying to achieve a blissful world here) this world in the service of His Will.

“Spirituality” is this-worldly.

We are striving to become better and better servants of Hashem, using only this life and this world to do so, while self-improvement is about using all of the transcendence latent in a person to make our lives in this world better and better.

I cannot be a scrooge and say that I’m unhappy with the programs which help people have better marriages, more successful jobs, be happier, have less depression, etc. I’m not a scrooge and my service to and relationship with G-d includes my celebration of everything and anything which lightens the load of another person, Jew or Gentile. So I am happy when I hear that people go off to retreats and come back calmer, have a better marriage or get/keep a life-sustaining job. That’s great news. Period.

Of course. The means are different, but the goal is exactly the same. Indeed, if Judaism was of interest, lightening the load of “Gentiles” would not make the Mussarite happier at all:

Sanhedrin 71b:

בן סורר ומורה נידון על שם סופו ימות זכאי ואל ימות חייב שמיתתן של רשעים הנאה להן והנאה לעולם לצדיקים רע להן ורע לעולם יין ושינה לרשעים הנאה להן והנאה לעולם ולצדיקים רע להן ורע לעולם פיזור לרשעים הנאה להן והנאה לעולם ולצדיקים רע להן ורע לעולם כנוס לרשעים רע להן ורע לעולם ולצדיקים הנאה להן והנאה לעולם שקט לרשעים רע להן ורע לעולם לצדיקים הנאה להן והנאה לעולם.

What all that does is give us more material to transform into service of Hashem. Don’t stop when your life is better; that’s not the goal; it’s a tool and its value is measured in terms of how it is used. Use your good marriage to emulate Hashem and His kindness. Use the peace of mind your improved job security affords to focus with more clarity on your Torah study, your performance of Mitzvos, on your freedom to live with honesty and integrity according to the Torah’s definitions of those terms, your ability to stay focused and undistracted by the myriad attempts of mischief to distract you. If you’re exercising regularly then you have more stamina to serve Hashem. If you are eating well then your body is less sluggish, less demanding and now you are freer to put your body to work in the Divine Misssion. Mussar is about the process of doing that.

Self-improvement may be included in the long list of tools to put to the service of the Divine Mission. However, failure to put them in their proper perspective runs the risk of leaving the person feeling like he/she has activated his/her transcendence without connecting Soul to Source. That is a terrible tragedy. I see it daily with people who get involved in Kabala, pseudo-mussar, and a host of other attempts to drain the wellspring of transcendence in each of us so that the Soul is fooled into serving the Body and fails to connect to the Source. I almost wish the person had remained in his/her hedonistic rut until ready to wake up to Sinai instead of having the Soul-craving slaked at a mirage fountain.

Define Mussar without all the buzzwords. Then define pseudo-mussar.

If I’ve not hammered it home enough here, please ask. From where I’m sitting, I’ve repeated myself more times in this article than I have in virtually any piece I’ve allowed to go past my screen.

I hope I’ve saved you a call.

The end.

Recent US and World Media Omissions

7 Huge News Stories You Probably Didn’t Hear About in 2017

בענין איסור משרד החינוך על פינות חי וליטוף ושיעורי טבע חיים

משרד החינוך אוסר כעת מטעמי “צער בעלי חיים”. הם בדרך לקבוע כללים מדויקים, אך בינתיים הכל אסור במוסדות חינוך, וזהו. מעניין מי בדיוק נועד להרוויח מהתקנות החדשות…

גם פינת חי עם בעל חיים אחד בלבד אסור. ממזמן גם אוסרים על הבאת כל בעל חיים שאינו כלב לבית ספר. כלומר, ה”מומחים” המשוריינים לחיות קבעו ברוב חכמתם והכרתם את עולם החי, שרק כלבים לא סובלים בבתי ספר…

שמעו הצעה נגדית משלי:

א. מכיוון שהוכח מכל הכיוונים שמחנות ה”חינוך” הכפוי הממשלתיות, בפרט בישראל, פוגעות בתלמידים, מסכנות את חייהם, ולא מחנכות לכלום מלבד לפשע ולסמים,
ב. ומכיון שפינות חי וכו’ הוכחו כבעלי תועלת,
ג. ומכיון שמאידך לא הוכח מעולם שהחיות סובלות בבי”ס כי הוא זה,
על כן: יש לשחרר את כל הילדים משעבוד לאלתר, ולהכניס תחתם את החיות…

How Walter Block Would Make Peace with North Korea

Dealing With North Korea

If I were President of the United States, or, more realistically, if Ron or Rand Paul were, and they appointed me Secretary of Defense, or Secretary of State, this is how I would deal with Kim Jong-un and the North Korean situation.

First, realize that Un’s theatrics are, from his own point of view, perfectly rational. He is not stupid. He looks at what happened to Muammar Gaddafi of Libya; murdered by mobs after kow-towing to the Great Satan. He notes the demise of Saddam Hussain of Iraq, another country that got on the wrong side of our imperialist nation; a similar dismal end befell him, too. It does not take much brain power to realize that Un’s only hope of escaping a similar fate would be, roughly, the one he has adopted: belligerence, nuclear armament, bellicosity, etc.

Here is what to do about the situation.

  1. Withdraw some 35,000 U.S. troops from the demilitarized zone, separating North and South Korea. What in bloody blue blazes are they doing there in the first place? Is not the Korean War of 1951 yet drawing to a close?
  2. Sign a formal agreement, a treaty, a contract, with, yes, North Korea, ending the unconstitutional, undeclared “police action” of 1951. This never should have been started in the first place. It is time, it is past time, to end it.
  3. Stop opposing any and all attempts of the two Koreas to unify with one another, perhaps along similar lines established by East and West Germany. What business is it of the U.S. what happens in that far away land? Ordinarily, I favor as many countries as possible. Seven billion plus is my ultimate goal, one for each of us. Certainly I support the secession of Catalonia, Quebec and any other breakaway province (or state! California: best of luck to you people in this regard). But, I am willing to make an exception in this one instance. In any case, this should be up, entirely, to Koreans, and the U.S. should take its big fat thumb out of this process.
  4. Open up a U.S. Embassy in Pyongyang. If we want peace with the Hermit Kingdom, this is a necessary step. As it happens, I oppose all such institutions. Maybe, perhaps, just possibly, they had some sort of legitimate function in a bygone day. But nowadays, in an era of electronic communications, they are not needed. We should not only pull all U.S. troops back to our own soil, but do this for diplomats as well. With one exception: North Korea. Yes, a U.S. embassy there would be an act of good faith. After relations between the two countries have normalized, then and only then would it be a proper moment to shut that one down too.
  5. Appoint Dennis Rodman U.S. Ambassador to North Korea. This sounds silly, but I am deadly serious about it. Yes, yes, get some career diplomats to assist him in dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s. But, it is difficult to think of a more friendly gesture than that.
  6. Well, here is another one. Maybe it is not all that problematic to think of something along these kindly lines. Stop those “War Games” between the U.S. and South Korea, which take place all over the neighborhood, east and west of North Korea, north and south of it, over and possibly under it too. How would we like it if a foreign power played “War Games” in our locality? We would not be too fond of it, I imagine. The U.S. established a “Monroe Doctrine” to keep foreign powers away from our doorstep. Does any rational person doubt that other countries, too, would like to establish a cordon sanitaire around themselves as well?
  7. Announce a unilateral declaration of free trade between the U.S. and North Korea. According to that old aphorism, if goods do not cross national borders, armies will. Does not the U.S. now have enough ongoing undeclared wars all over the place? Hot ones in the Middle East and Afghanistan, Cold ones with Russia, China, Iran, etc. Do we really need this potentially nuclear conflagration with North Korea as well?
  8. And while we’re at it, stop with this craziness with China. Yes, we have a balance of trade deficit with the Middle Kingdom. I’ve got a horrid record with Wal-Mart and McDonald’s. They don’t buy a penny of my services, ever, and I purchase goods from them all the time. What of it? Insofar as unilateral declarations of free trade is concerned, yes, North Korea first, and then, five minutes later, with every other nation on the planet.

Why is it so important that we sort out this outrageous situation with North Korea? Why is this perhaps more imperative than regularized relations with other parts of the world into which the U.S. has stuck its ugly proboscis? Kim Jong-un is less stable than the leaders of other countries we have invaded, or threatened. He has nuclear capabilities, and a fast developing delivery system. A mistake would annihilate the people of that poor country, and, perhaps, horribly, those of an American city. This is not the time, if ever there was, for threats, bombast, belligerence, which has been hurled in both directions. This is the time for the adults to take charge. No, it is long past that time.

Dennis, are you down with this?

From Lewrockwell.com, here.