Caught in the Yetzer’s Net? Just Tie Yourself Up!

Harry Fishel was a leading pioneer and philanthropist of Jewry.

He escaped Russia as a youth to avoid the tsar’s army draft and, like all immigrants, had extreme difficulty not working on Shabbos. As the common refrain went: “If you don’t come in on Saturday, don’t bother coming in on Monday”. (Fishel had barely any Jewish literacy to buoy him; he only started learning gemara at age 69.)

I haven’t read Harry Fishel’s autobiography myself, but here is how the story is presented in Hamodia newspaper (probably copied from the autobiography):

Harry landed a good job in his field (architect) with great pay, but they refused to keep him if he kept Shabbos, even at half the offered salary, and he spent a sleepless Friday night struggling at a crossroads. Harry finally decided to go to Shabbos Shachris in the morning and from there continue to his job.

But then:

While he was in shul, he realized he would be the first person in his family ever to desecrate Shabbos, and he went up to the aron kodesh and prayed for guidance. He then changed into work clothes, but as he walked, the vision of his parents slowed his steps; he felt paralyzed, and chills shook his body.

Harry realized his prayers had been answered. He knew what he had to do, and he returned home to continue observing Shabbos, a strange sense of peace pervading him. Never again would Harry Fischel contemplate any desecration of Torah law.

Perhaps this is is also the intention of “Chayei Moharan” chap. 459:

אמר לאחד על מה שספר לפניו שהיה מרגל בעברות גדולות, עד שכמעט לא היה ביד עצמו למנע עצמו מלעשותם. השיב לו שיש בחינת התקשרות לקשר ולחבר עצמו יחד בהתקשרות חזק, ועי”ז יכולין להתגבר ולהנצל. ולא באר הענין. ואעפ”כ אפשר להבין הענין קצת והיא עצה נפלאה (ועין בלקוטי הלכות הלכות ראש חדש הלכה ו).

Anyway, it sounds like good Jewish advice to me…

Ron Paul on Trump’s Plan To Cut Half the Offense Budget

Can We Really Cut Half of the Military Budget? You Bet!

02/18/2025

The wailing sound you heard last Thursday was the chorus of the Beltway warmongers shrieking in despair at President Trump’s suggestion that there was no reason for the United States to be spending one trillion dollars on “defense.”

“…[O]ne of the first meetings I want to have is with President Xi of China and President Putin of Russia, and I want to say let’s cut our military budget in half. And we can do that, and I think we’ll be able to do that,” the President told reporters.

With this statement, President Trump blew up one of the biggest myths of our time, particularly among Republicans, that spending more on the military is essential to keeping us safe. There is a vast and well-funded network of political and industrial interests that depend on maintaining that myth, from the weapons manufacturers to the mainstream media to the think tanks and beyond. Why? Because most of what is called “defense spending” has little to do with defending this country and a lot to do with enriching the politically well-connected.

Maintaining that global military empire has bankrupted the United States while making us less safe and less free. President Trump seems to understand this. But the military-industrial complex and its cheerleaders have for decades pushed the idea that we could not survive without continuously increasing their budgets.

Thanks to the work of the “Department of Government Efficiency” we are learning that much of what has been sold as “essential spending” is nothing of the sort. Take USAID, for example. We were led to believe that this agency was feeding the poor while promoting the best kind of American values overseas. Thanks to DOGE, we learned that the money was going to absurdities like funding transgender puppet shows in Peru.

We are also learning that a great deal of USAID money was going to actually overthrow democratic governments overseas – as well as manipulate foreign media and promote censorship of “dissident” voices at home and abroad. Not only was USAID not helping countries overseas – it was actually harming them!

Just as with USAID, when we are able to see just where that one trillion military budget is going Americans are going to fully realize that they have been lied to for decades. That is why we need a full audit of the Pentagon and full transparency of the results.

We also need a change in policy. Americans are beginning to understand the economic costs of maintaining a global military empire. US taxpayers are forced to cover more than half of the entire NATO budget while European countries rattle sabers at Russia and threaten war. If Europe feels so threatened by Russia, why don’t they cover the costs of their own defense? Why do poor Americans have to pay for the defense of rich Europeans? Haven’t we had enough of this?

I very much hope that President Trump follows through with his plan to drastically reduce our bloated military budget. We can start by closing the hundreds of military bases overseas, bringing back our troops from foreign countries, and eliminating our massive commitments to NATO and other international organizations.

We will be richer, safer, and happier.

From Mises.org, here.

Trump’s Aza Plan: An Interesting Comment From a Friend

You can imagine how much I trust politicians, etc., but I heard something interesting.

Someone said he watched the announcement made by Trump and noticed something… different.

D. Trump didn’t only surprise Benito, he surprised himself, as well. Trump seemed surprised by the words that came out of his own mouth!

If true, well, hmmm. I wonder…

גורן: בגידה בתורה הקדושה בשם המדינה

יש מאמר אקדמי של ד”ר אביעד הולנדר בשם: “נאמנות כפולה להלכה ולמדינה ופתרונה:פסיקתו של הרב שלמה גורן כמקרה בוחן“.

לא קראתי מילה, אבל אם אני מתרגם נכון את הכותרת, גורן ימ”ש בגד פשוט בהלכה.

מתוך ספר “עטרת שלמה” עמ’ 54:

על היבט נוסף בשיקולי הרב גורן הצביע הרב ד”ר אביעד הולנדר: “בעיניו של הרב גורן החשש מפני לחץ פוליטי שעלול היה להביא לידי הפקעת מוסד הנישואין מידי הרבנות מצדיק מהלכים הלכתיים חריגים. בראיונות רבים מאותם ימים (של פרשת האח והאחות – ש.ה) הרב גורן שב וטען שיש להיזהר ממצב שבו החמרה הלכתית תביא לידי חקיקה חילונית שתרחיק את העם היושב בציון ממסורת ההלכה. דומה כי בעיניו ההקלה במקרה האח והאחות נועדה לא רק להקל עליהם, אלא לפתור משבר ביחסי ההלכה והמדינה” (מוסף שבת, ‘מקור ראשון’, א’ אב תשע”ב).

הבאנו כתבה דומה באנגלית כאן.