זהירות! פופקורן של ‘היתר מכירה’ בחניות בהשגחת העד”ח

קיבלתי את ההודעה הבאה:

התווית המצו”ב נמצאה תפורה לשק של פופקורן באחת מחנויות הפיצוחים בהשגחת העדה”ח, ובאותה חנות נמצאו ארבעה שקים נוספים של 25 ק”ג של אותה סחורה אסורה באיסור ספיחין, ונזרע ונעבד בשביעית, לאחר ברור עם המשגיח באותה חנות נלקחה התוצרת הנ”ל ואף הפסיקו לייצר עד לאחר ליבון המכשיר.

אולם לאחר ברור מעמיק עם המשגיח שאחראי לתחום הזה, נתברר שב”אסיפי קמה”  חברה המשווקת סחורה להרבה חניות בהגחת העה”ח, משווקים גם סחורה של היתר מכירה, והמשגיח במקום משגיח על מילוי השקים ותפירתם בהשגחת הבד”ץ מיבול שישית, אולם במשטחים לא היתה לו דרך לבדוק שלא יארזו גם שקים של היתר מכירה, וגם המשגיח של החנויות גם אין לו דרך לבדוק,  [ומכאן והלאה יודפסו התיות של היתר מכירה בצבע שונה ובזה יוקל על המשגיחים לבדוק], וא”כ בכל החניות בהשגחת העה”ח יש חשש בפופקורן שיוצר השבוע.

תיקוני עירובין גליון 354#

גליון שאלות הלכתיות המתחדשות מידי שבוע בבדיקת העירובים השכונתיים

השבוע בגליון: מדוע המצות של העירוב העירוני מונחות בבית הכנסת, והעירוב השכונתי בבית / האם עירוב המונח בבית הכנסת מועיל לבני ספרד / האחראי רצה לכתוב על המצות שבבכנ”ס ‘אין לקחת’, והסתפק אולי זה פוסל את העירוב / בעל השדה הקיף את העמוד הסמוך לצינורות המים ופסל את העירוב / מה נחשב גדרות זמניים / הגבהת הגדר עם אבנים ליצור חלל תחתיה / על משמר ההלכה בטלטול ברחוב זבוטינסקי בבני ברק / מכתב רבני העיר בענין הגשר הסגור כעת / התאגדות מוסדות ששוכרים מתחמים להקים יחד עירוב קבוע, להוזיל עלויות ולדרוש מההנהלה / עירוב שהוקם השבוע למתחם והגבול סמו לספסל, האם אסור לשבת עם חפץ שמא יטלטל בחוץ לחוט.

מוקד העירוב בעריכת תכנית להרחבת העירוב בישוב מיצד / האם מחיצה גודרת בצד הפנימי או החיצוני / קיר שחלק כשר מהצד הפנימי, וחלק נמו וכשר רק מהצד החיצוני, יש פירצה בעובי הקיר.

Download (PDF, 2.29MB)

Reprinted with permission.

Dave Barry

“All I Think Is That It’s Stupid”: An Interview with Dave Barry

Dave Barry on laughing at Very Big Government

GLENN GARVIN | FROM THE DECEMBER 1994 ISSUE

A New York Times profile once said that Miami Herald humor columnist Dave Barry “makes his living by taking prosaic ideas to incongruous extremes.” He is the only Pulitzer Prize winner to have a sitcom—CBS’s Dave’s World—based, very loosely, on his life. (They turned his one son and two dogs into just the opposite, but he enjoys cashing the checks.)

The Pulitzer Prize judges gave Barry the award for commentary in 1988 “for his consistently effective use of humor as a device for presenting fresh insights into serious concerns.” His concerns include beer, Barbie, a “worldwide epidemic of snakes in toilets,” exploding Pop-Tarts, and, perhaps most famously, “the worst songs ever recorded.”

To be fair to the Pulitzer committee, the real Dave does devote more column inches than the average pundit to making Very Big Government look silly and obnoxious. This is a fresh insight in New York and Washington, and wildly popular with readers, who have bought more than a million copies of his books.

Taking prosaic ideas to incongruous extremes, he writes things like: “With the federal deficit running at several hundred billion dollars per year, Congress passed a transportation bill that, according to news reports, includes $30 million for a ‘hightech’ moving sidewalk in Altoona, which happens to be in the district of Rep. ‘Bud’ Shuster, the ranking Republican on the surface transportation subcommittee.

“I don’t know about you, but as a taxpayer, I am outraged to discover that, in this day and age, Altoona residents are still being forced to walk around on regular low-tech stationary sidewalks. I’m thinking of maybe organizing a group of us to go there and carry Altoonans on our backs until they get their new sidewalk. I’m also thinking that maybe we should donate an additional $10 million or so to build them a high-tech computerized Spit Launcher that will fire laser-guided gobs onto the moving sidewalk, so the Altoonans won’t have to do this manually. ‘What have I done today to help keep ‘Bud’ Shuster in Congress?’ is a question we all need to ask ourselves more often.”

Contributing Editor Glenn Garvin interviewed Barry at his Miami Herald office.

Reason: You were in Washington recently to do a story. What was it like there?

Barry: It’s like going to Mars. When you come back out no one is talking about any of the things the people in Washington are talking about.

If we’re spending $853 trillion on some program now, and next year we spend any less, that’s “budget-cutting” to them. For them, the question is always, “What kind of government intervention should we impose on the world?” They never think that maybe we shouldn’t.

It gives me a real advantage as a humorist because I get credit for having insight and understanding—and I don’t. I don’t have any insight or understanding on anything about the government. All I think is that it’s stupid—which is the one perspective that’s almost completely lacking in Washington.

Continue reading…

From Reasonhere.

Wait, SO NOW It’s Acceptable To Poke Holes in Big Pharma?!

Despite repeated DOJ findings of corrupt marketing by some of the world’s biggest pharmaceutical giants, major drug companies continue to circumvent responsibility for much of their wrongdoing and to enjoy great public trust.

The rap sheets for some of the wealthiest drug companies go back many years, as will be seen below. Yet the billions of dollars they have been forced to pay out in penalties for their misconduct are dwarfed by lucrative profits rolling into the companies’ coffers from ill-gotten gains.

Despite the public disgrace in being repeatedly caught breaking the law, the drug manufacturers have continued to prosper. As witnessed during the Covid-19 pandemic—they have even managed to reinvent themselves as humanity’s ‘saviors.’

A History Stained with Alleged Criminal Neglect

Pfizer CEO Albert Boula claimed during a recent interview that a group of medical professionals intentionally circulating “misinformation” critical of the Pfizer mRNA shot were “criminal.”

The Pfizer CEO must have forgotten the history of his own company. That landscape is stained with tens of thousands of lawsuits alleging criminal neglect and intentional wrongdoing, in marketing dangerous drugs and failing to alert consumers to their life-threatening risks.

Since 2002, the company and its subsidiaries have been assessed $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards, writes the Corporate Research Project. These payments were granted as compensation for medical injuries, for false claims by the company, and for hiding research that could hurt its marketing initiatives.

Other payments were penalties for bribing doctors and medical corporations to prescribe and promote Pfizer-manufactured drugs.

Some of the most publicized of these cases were settled in 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013 and 2017, as described below.

But the shame and monetary price of having its crimes exposed have not deterred the drug giant. It’s as though the penalties and payouts are all part of the acceptable cost of “doing business.”

‘Children Were Used as Human Guinea Pigs’

In 1996, Pfizer gave the experimental drug Trovan to 200 Nigerian children ill with meningitis, without informing their parents that an approved cure already existed, or that their children were subjects of a medical experiment.

Eleven children died. Many others suffered brain damage, organ failure, or paralysis.

Washington Post investigation reported that one 10-year-old girl suffering from meningitis was not taken off experimental Trovan and given the alternative proven treatment by Pfizer’s trial managers — even when it was clear that her condition was deteriorating. One of her eyes froze. She lost strength and then died.

Continue reading…

From Yated (English), here.