120 Recent Articles You May Have Missed

  1. יש על מה לחזור בתשובה
  2. SUICIDAL?: Hyehudi Argues with Rabbi YY Jacobson…
  3. Identifying the Chilazon by R’ Chaim E. Twerski
  4. ‘Pesukei Dezimra Is About Minimizing Monarchy and Drawing Toward Divine Kingship’
  5. Note to Anti-Zionists: Appeasement Often Brings WAR!
  6. Chiddushim Ubi’urim Against Zeman Rabbenu Tam
  7. Illustrative Back-and-Forth on Corona Vaccine Halacha
  8. אוסף ד”ת בענין חיסון הקורונה
  9. תיקוני עירובין גליון 300#
  10. INTERNET: The Gedolim’s Handlers Are Hypocrites, so You Need To Do the Right Thing for ITS OWN SAKE
  11. Iggros Moshe Says Something… Now, Where To Find the Alternate Views??
  12. Conspiracy Theory: Correcting a Common Misunderstanding
  13. אמר רב י”ח חדש גדלתי אצל רועי בקר – פרסומת לכולל דרישת ציון של הרב אברהם צוויג
  14. ספר ‘ויאמינו בה’ ובמשה עבדו’: ערעור אחד הקוראים ותגובת המחבר
  15. איפה המחאות?! – ‘אנטישמיות כלכלית’ בחידושי מהרש”א
  16. לקראת יום העיון “תורה ולשון” – חנוכה
  17. ברית מילה זו טובת הילד – לעג על המבקרים
  18. יהודה סגל מנסה להקים את המדינה לטובתנו
  19. ‘Bnei Beischo’ – Shloime Cohen
  20. Want Shalom Bayis? Be a Tzaddik
  21. Chumros Have a Built-In Limit
  22. על מכרם בכסף צדיק ואביון בעבור נעלים – המדיה החרדית במבט חדש
  23. על מה חושב יהודי כשהוא הולך ברחוב
  24. Like the Anti-Ezra Jews Caused the Destruction of the Second Temple…
  25. ‘The Foreigner Among You Will Rise Above You Higher and Higher While You Sink Lower and Lower’
  26. What Ben Gurion Told Isaiah Leibowitz
  27. Secret Horrific Crimes of the USG in WWII
  28. תשובה הלכתית בענין חיסון הקורונה – הרב שלמה אלכסנדר פאללאק
  29. ‘Levush HaAron’ on Techeiles – FREE, Quality English Translation Available!
  30. ‘Orthodox Jew’: An Oxymoron
  31. מורא מקדש: פחד מועיל ולא פחד משתק
  32. תחשוב טוב יהיה טוב, אבל אם לא תחשוב בכלל יהיה *עוד יותר* טוב! – הרב אלימלך בידרמן
  33. ‘Daas Torah’ Worse Than Famous, Repeated Papal Bull!
  34. Official Translation of Jewish Court Ruling on Corona Injection
  35. R’ Chaim Kanievsky and R’ Moshe Sternbuch LESSENED Opposition to Techeiles
  36. Appealing a Masking Fine In Court – Reader’s Detailed Account
  37. Maybe Israel Can Ape RUSSIA For a Change??
  38. Bloomah’s City Farm In Ramat Bet Shemesh
  39. Propaganda Works Better on the Formally Educated – Noam Chomsky Explains Why
  40. מעשה אבות סימן לבנים – דברים כדרבנות בענין קדושת א”י והמקדש בזה”ז
  41. עבודה זרה במחזור: הרב חיים גריינימן לעומת בעל המנחת אלעזר
  42. ‘Corrupt Politicians Make the Other Ten Percent Look Bad’
  43. The Real Reason for Government Schooling
  44. יצחק, מנחה, זיווג – ואת בריתי אקים את יצחק
  45. Immigration Restrictionism DOES NOT Equal Racism!
  46. Even the Most Change-Fearing Jews Today Don’t Boycott Chicken Soup Confounded With Carrots!
  47. ‘Ma’aseh Avot Siman Labanim’ – Rabbi Yaakov Moshe Charlap on Chayei Sarah
  48. CALLING ALL CLERICALISTS: Is No One Zealous for the Honor of Rabbi Chaim Greineman?!
  49. צניעות אמתית פירושה ‘לא לזרום’ – הרב אברהם אופנבכר
  50. Mr. Lew Rockwell Makes the Case Against Public Libraries
  51. There Are Lies, Stats Lies… and Then There Are Corona Vaccine Lies
  52. אסור לו לאדם לעשות חפציו קודם שיתפלל – ושכרה בצידה
  53. Jewish History Shatters Historical Materialism
  54. קליפ קשה לצפייה: אתאיזם היא סוג של התעללות בילדים
  55. Good News: The Apikorsim of Israeli B. G. University Now Slander Holy Scripture Less!
  56. Jeffrey Tucker Reacts Daily
  57. The Corona Vaccine’s Risks for Women Are Being Suppressed
  58. בחסות ‘חדש אסור מן התורה’, הרב חיים שאול גריינימן מדיח לעבודה זרה
  59. ברחת – הפסדת: כמה אפשר להרוויח מסבלנות בבית הכנסת
  60. סיפור אמתי על תפילה במקומות הקדושים בהסוואה של תייר בעת הכיבוש הירדני
  61. Rabbi Avi Grossman Defends the Temple Mount Youth
  62. A Jew ‘Moving BACK to America’?!
  63. Ron Unz: Corona Was Created by America
  64. Were You Fined for Going Outside Last Year? You May Be Entitled to a Refund!
  65. מאמר נאה מאוד בענין חומר הדבר שנמצאים עכו”ם על מקום המקדש
  66. לקט מאמרים בעד עליה להר הבית בטהרה
  67. מפי הגוי בעצמו: הערמת מכירת חמץ היא חילול השם
  68. The Importance of Believing True Conspiracies
  69. חשוב: שיעור מרב יואל ראטה [כתוביות בעברית] – וכוף את יצרנו להשתעבד לך
  70. Gemara Claims Going To War Is Always Good for the Economy? NO!
  71. A Perennial Critic of Hyehudi LIKES These Two Articles:
  72. The United States – Still the ‘Main Menace to the Very Existence of the Human Race’
  73. This Coming Shabbos Was the Day of the Balfour Declaration!
  74. What Exactly Is ‘Intertextuality’?
  75. Chananya Weissman on Parshas Vayeira: The Place for Silence
  76. What Is a ‘Carlebach-Style’ Minyan??
  77. MUST-SEE: Bill Kristol and the Neocons’ Hubris Beaten In Full View
  78. שיבה לבצרון: סדרת וירא לפי החלוקה היהודית לסדרים
  79. What To Do if Shipwrecked – The Amazing Story of Alain Bombard
  80. Corona Vaccine Injuries Vastly Underreported
  81. דעת הסטייפלר על נוסח ‘הריני מקשר’ של ברסלב
  82. Hashgacha Pratis: Vayeira Chayei Sarah 5782
  83. Baruch Dayan Ha’emes: Rabbi Eliyahu Kaufman
  84. The Revolving Door: All 3 FDA-authorized COVID shot companies now employ former FDA commissioners
  85. How Some Cursedians Became ‘Pro-Israel’
  86. Beat Corona Tyranny: Today Gan, Tomorrow the Whole Country!
  87. How To Answer the Fool
  88. A Question About ‘Minhag America’
  89. Corona Has Cures, but Fear Corona Fear Itself
  90. There You Shall Go To Seek His Presence – A Comprehensive Halakhic Analysis regarding Ascending the Temple Mount
  91. What’s More Important to the ‘Gedolim’: Preventing Adultery or Preserving the Community?!
  92. The Gift of Prayerful Suffering
  93. פסק בית הדין המיוחד לבירור סכנת חיסוני הקורונה
  94. The Afghan War WAS NOT a Response to 9/11
  95. ‘The Road Not Taken’ – What I Admire MOST About Rabbi Grossman
  96. If It Can’t Be Lived By EVERYONE Then It Isn’t Judaism At All!
  97. Second-Hand Story of Israeli Police Insanity
  98. ספר ‘לשכנו תדרשו ובאת שמה’ – בירור הלכתי מקיף בנושא העלייה להר הבית
  99. re: Bald Monkeys Aren’t ‘Nazirites’
  100. לעתים *חייבים* לפרוש מן הציבור – הרש”ר הירש בריש פר’ לך לך
  101. The Government Still Lying About Shanksville on 9/11
  102. הרב יוסף בנימין הלוי ואזנר שליט”א – לאחר שמיעת עדויות על החיסון
  103. Did the Rambam Really Enter the Temple Mount? A Counterclaim
  104. ההיסטוריה הכלכלית של העולם – ניתוח קצרצר מבית המלבי”ם
  105. Meet Avraham Avinu – An ‘IMAM’?!
  106. Check Out INSTANT, No Muss No Fuss Shabbos Light Covers
  107. The Government Response to Corona: A Childlike Inability To Consider Tradeoffs
  108. PRICELESS: Scott Horton Indicts Bill Kristol and His War Against Mankind
  109. Hebrew Isn’t Lashon Hakodesh? But Then, Neither Is Lashon Chazal!
  110. ‘The More Things Change, The More They Remain The Same’
  111. חושפים את עלילת דומא – סרטונים קצרים
  112. Not To Express an Opinion About the Essence of the Matter…
  113. What Took So Long to Expose Berland?! Rabbi Y. M. Shechter Offers His Defense
  114. Can You EVER Trust the Establishment These Days?
  115. סקר בנושא איסור ריבית בבנקים ומוצרים בנקאיים
  116. ירחון ‘קדושת ציון’ גליון #61 – חשון תשפ”ב
  117. משל פיקנטי בענין חוברת ‘ד’ אחד ושמו אחד’ נגד חסידות ברסלב
  118. Language Matters – How to Communicate with Doctors
  119. Rabbinate ‘Kashrut’ Satire
  120. Your Mashgiach Says a Chiddush? Trust But Verify!

Did You Know Feds Steal Californian Raisins, Sell Them Cheap to Foreigners?

Why does America regulate the trade in raisins?

An anomaly in a country that celebrates red-blooded capitalism

Apr 15th 2013

THE Supreme Court has frequently handed down judgments that have shaken America to its core. Now, it has turned its attention to the raisin. A group of farmers has brought a complaint about the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, under which the government confiscates part of the annual national raisin crop. The Court is considering whether the arrangement is constitutional. But why is a country that generally celebrates red-blooded capitalism regulating the raisin trade in the first place?

Since the 1940s a government agency called the Raisin Administrative Committee has confiscated a portion of the annual raisin crop: 47% in 2003 and 30% in 2004, for example. Farmers who fail to surrender their raisins are fined. The committee, which is made up of 47 farmers and packers, plus one member of the public, does not pay farmers for the raisins it expropriates—indeed, it gives many away and sells others for export at low prices. After covering its costs it gives farmers the remaining profits if there are any.

The stated aim of this bizarre system is to preserve an “orderly” market, by determining how many raisins the domestic market can bear and then getting rid of the rest. It is unclear why raisins need this sort of central planning when the supply and demand of most products are left to market forces. Though the majority of raisin farmers were in favour of the plan when it started 65 years ago, these days many of them are unhappy about having to give away a big chunk of their crop. Nor does the system represent a good deal for consumers: the artificial raisin-scarcity created by the expropriations drives up prices, which means that Californian raisins are sometimes cheaper abroad than they are in California itself.

The raisin is not the only federally regulated fruit. In all, 30 products are bound by such “marketing orders”, which are overseen by the Department of Agriculture. The Court is to rule on the narrow question of whether the government should at least pay for the raisins it snatches, but its decision could open the way to a wider overhaul of the system. The evidence is that unregulated trade in fruits can prosper without the need for federal involvement. Citrus farmers, for instance, recently scrapped a similar system and seem to be coping inside the free market. There seems little reason not to do the same for the raisin.

From The Economist, here.

Afghanistan, Graveyard of the American Empire?

The Decline and Fall of the Roman… Whoops!… American Empire

What Really Matters in the U.S. of A.

They weren’t kidding when they called Afghanistan the “graveyard of empires.” Indeed, that cemetery has just taken another imperial body. And it wasn’t pretty, was it? Not that anyone should be surprised. Even after 20 years of preparation, a burial never is.

In fact, the shock and awe(fulness) in Kabul and Washington over these last weeks shouldn’t have been surprising, given our history. After all, we were the ones who prepared the ground and dug the grave for the previous interment in that very cemetery.

That, of course, took place between 1979 and 1989 when Washington had no hesitation about using the most extreme Islamists — arming, funding, training, and advising them — to ensure that one more imperial carcass, that of the Soviet Union, would be buried there. When, on February 15, 1989, the Red Army finally left Afghanistan, crossing the Friendship Bridge into Uzbekistan, Soviet commander General Boris Gromov, the last man out, said, “That’s it. Not one Soviet soldier or officer is behind my back.” It was his way of saying so long, farewell, good riddance to the endless war that the leader of the Soviet Union had by then taken to calling “the bleeding wound.” Yet, in its own strange fashion, that “graveyard” would come home with them. After all, they returned to a bankrupt land, sucked dry by that failed war against those American- and Saudi-backed Islamist extremists.

Two years later, the Soviet Union would implode, leaving just one truly great power on Planet Earth — along with, of course, those very extremists Washington had built into a USSR-destroying force. Only a decade later, in response to an “air force” manned by 19 mostly Saudi hijackers dispatched by Osama bin Laden, a rich Saudi prince who had been part of our anti-Soviet effort in Afghanistan, the world’s “sole superpower” would head directly for that graveyard (as bin Laden desired).

Despite the American experience in Vietnam during the previous century — the Afghan effort of the 1980s was meant to give the USSR its own “Vietnam” — key Bush administration officials were so sure of themselves that, as the New York Times recently reported, they wouldn’t even consider letting the leaders of the Taliban negotiate a surrender once our invasion began. On September 11, 2001, in the ruins of the Pentagon, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had already given an aide these instructions, referring not just to Bin Laden but Iraqi ruler Saddam Hussein: “Go massive. Sweep it up, all up. Things related and not.” Now, he insisted, “The United States is not inclined to negotiate surrenders.” (Of course, had you read war reporter Anand Gopal’s 2014 book, you would have long known just how fruitlessly Taliban leaders tried to surrender to a power intent on war and nothing but war.)

Allow a surrender and have everything grind to a disappointing halt? Not a chance, not when the Afghan War was the beginning of what was to be an American triumph of global proportions. After all, the future invasion of Iraq and the domination of the oil-rich Greater Middle East by the one and only power on the planet were already on the agenda. How could the leaders of such a confident land with a military funded at levels the next most powerful countries combined couldn’t match have imagined its own 2021 version of surrender?

And yet, once again, 20 years later, Afghanistan has quite visibly and horrifyingly become a graveyard of empire (as well, of course, as a graveyard for Afghans). Perhaps it’s only fitting that the secretary of defense who refused the surrender of the enemy in 2001 was recently buried in Arlington National Cemetery with full honors. In fact, the present secretary of defense and the head of the joint chiefs of staff both reportedly “knelt before Mr. Rumsfeld’s widow, Joyce, who was in a wheelchair, and presented her with the flag from her husband’s coffin.”

Meanwhile, Joe Biden was the third president since George W. Bush and crew launched this country’s forever wars to find himself floundering haplessly in that same graveyard of empires. If the Soviet example didn’t come to mind, it should have as Democrats and Republicans, President Biden and former President Trump flailed at each other over their supposedly deep feelings for the poor Afghans being left behind, while this country withdrew its troops from Kabul airport in a land where “rest in peace” has long had no meaning.

America’s True Infrastructure Spending

Here’s the thing, though: don’t assume that Afghanistan is the only imperial graveyard around or that the U.S. can simply withdraw, however ineptly, chaotically, and bloodily, leaving that country to history — and the Taliban. Put another way, even though events in Kabul and its surroundings took over the mainstream news recently, the Soviet example should remind us that, when it comes to empires, imperial graveyards are hardly restricted to Afghanistan.

In fact, it might be worth taking a step back to look at the big picture. For decades, the U.S. has been involved in a global project that’s come to be called “nation building,” even if, from Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia to Afghanistan and Iraq, it often seemed an endless exercise in nation (un)building. An imperial power of the first order, the United States long ago largely rejected the idea of straightforward colonies. In the years of the Cold War and then of the war on terror, its leaders were instead remarkably focused on setting up an unparalleled empire of  on a global scale. This and the wars that went with it have been the unsettling American imperial project since World War II.

And that unsettling should be taken quite literally. Even before recent events in Afghanistan, Brown University’s invaluable Costs of War Project estimated that this country’s conflicts of the last two decades across the Greater Middle East and Africa had displaced at least 38 million people, which should be considered nation (un)building of the first order.

Since the Cold War began, Washington has engaged in an endless series of interventions around the planet from Iran to the CongoChile to Guatemala, as well as in conflicts, large and small. Now, with Joe Biden having withdrawn from America’s disastrous Afghan War, you might wonder whether it’s all finally coming to an end, even if the U.S. still insists on maintaining 750 sizeable military bases globally.

Count on this, though: the politicians of the great power that hasn’t won a significant war since 1945 will agree on one thing — that the Pentagon and the military-industrial complex deserve yet more funding (no matter what else doesn’t). In truth, those institutions have been the major recipients of actual infrastructure spending over much of what might still be thought of as the American century. They’ve been the true winners in this society, along with the billionaires who, even in the midst of a grotesque pandemic, raked in profits in a historic fashion. In the process, those tycoons created possibly the largest inequality gap on the planet, one that could destabilize a democracy even if nothing else were going on. The losers? Don’t even get me started.

Or think of it this way: yes, in August 2021, it was Kabul, not Washington, D.C., that fell to the enemy, but the nation (un)building project in which this country has been involved over these last decades hasn’t remained thousands of miles away. Only half-noticed here, it’s been coming home, big time. Donald Trump’s rise to the presidency, amid election promises to end America’s “endless wars,” should really be seen as part of that war-induced (un)building project at home. In his own strange fashion, The Donald was Kabul before its time and his rise to power unimaginable without those distant conflicts and the spending that went with them, all of which, however unnoticed, unsettled significant parts of this society.

Climate War in a Graveyard of Empires?

You can tell a lot about a country if you know where its politicians unanimously agree to invest taxpayer dollars.

At this very moment, the U.S. is in a series of crises, none worse than the heat, fire, and flood “season” that’s hit not just the megadrought-ridden West, or inundated Tennessee, or hurricane-whacked Louisiana, or the tropical-storm-tossed Northeast, but the whole country. Unbearable warmth, humidity, firessmoke, storms, and power outages, that’s us. Fortunately, as always, Congress stands in remarkable unanimity when it comes to investing money where it truly matters.

And no, you knew perfectly well that I wasn’t referring to the creation of a green-energy economy. In fact, Republicans wouldn’t hear of it and the Biden administration, while officially backing the idea, has already issued more than 2,000 permits to fossil-fuel companies for new drilling and fracking on federal lands. In August, the president even called on OPEC — the Saudis, in particular — to produce significantly more oil to halt a further rise in gas prices at the pump.

As America’s eternally losing generals come home from Kabul, what I actually had in mind was the one thing just about everyone in Washington seems to agree on: funding the military-industrial complex beyond their wildest dreams. Congress has recently spent months trying to pass a bill that would, over a number of years, invest an extra $550 billion in this country’s badly tattered infrastructure, but never needs time like that to pass Pentagon and other national security budgets that, for years now, have added up to well over a trillion dollars annually.

In another world, with the Afghan War ending and U.S. forces (at least theoretically) coming home, it might seem logical to radically cut back on the money invested in the military-industrial complex and its ever more expensive weaponry. In another American world on an increasingly endangered planet, significantly scaling back American forces in every way and investing our tax dollars in a very different kind of “defense” would seem logical indeed. And yet, as of this moment, as Greg Jaffe writes at the Washington Post, the Pentagon continues to suck up “a larger share of discretionary spending than any other government agency.”

Fortunately for those who want to keep funding the U.S. military in the usual fashion, there’s a new enemy out there with which to replace the Taliban, one that the Biden foreign-policy team and a “pivoting” military is already remarkably eager to confront: China.

Continue reading…

From LRC, here.

Guilt Feelings About Removing Tefillin Too Fast

The M.B. quotes the Shelah saying to remove Tefillin shel Rosh with the weaker hand, to show קשה עלי פרידתכם. (Not Tefillin shel Yad.)

On the other hand, mitzvos are generally done with the stronger hand, and if one is saying the Bracha of לשמור חוקיו upon removing Tefillin at the end of the day, how is this any different from taking down the Sukkah or bringing in dishes to the Sukkah?

So, is it about showing respect, as in leaving the Mikdash slowly, or is it about guilt feelings?