re: As Told Me by a Friend…
But here’s the irony: injustice aside – if your own child would be attending such a school, wouldn’t you rather it be SHE who teaches your child hilchos Shabbos…?
How Yehuda Segal Writes to Lawyers…
Yehuda Segal wrote an article on the government war on prayer at Kever Dan. He received an obnoxious letter from an “objective” lawyer, defending the state. The nerve! So, Segal let him have it…
Note: The back-and-forth is heavily edited to avoid lawsuits!
The original article:
Only in the State of Israel: Kever Dan Was Sealed
Yehuda Segal ה’ חשון ה’תשע”ח 25/10/17
At first it appeared Religious Affairs Minister David Azulai would be able to delay the decree for the time being, but that didn’t happen. The Gravesite is sealed and barred.
Kever Dan Ben Yaakov was sealed this morning with blocks and cement, in spite of the place being a central magnet for Jews from the entire region.
Two years ago the local branch of the Chut Shel Chessed Yeshiva operating near the gravesite was destroyed as an “illegal structure”. But the authorities’ rage toward those “squatting” on their forefathers’ inheritance was not yet satisfied. The Antiquities Authority received a final ruling from the courts to continue blocking up the gravesite with cement and blocks, as they indeed did, to the great sorrow of visitors.
And what’s the excuse? They speak of “state-owned land” (?), “forests”, and missing electricity and engineering permits. Of the slight chance someone might build something illegal, this although there is nothing built there at the moment, but the simple structure over the dome! If this was the grave of an Arab Sheik, you can be sure nothing would happen to it.
Bottom line: We need to wrest this and all other holy sites from the hands of the state and return them back into rightful private ownership. This is the only way we can ensure their upkeep, building safety, electricity, and serve those who visit to pour their brokenhearted prayers at our forefathers’ graves.
At first it appeared Religious Affairs Minister David Azulai would be able to delay the decree for the time being, but that didn’t happen. The Gravesite is sealed and barred.
This article first appeared in Hebrew.
With Heaven’s help, Yehuda Segal
The lawyer:
Arizal did not consider kever dan a holy site with a mesora, and therefore omitted it from the exhaustive list of tradition-based kevarim he composed.
Misrad HaDatot is following the tradition of the Arizal. You’re not.
Do you have a competing, authoritative mesora different than his?
M. HaDatot is trying to discourage people from devoting money and resources [read: erroneously donating their tzedakah money] to a site which may indeed be nothing more than the grave of an Arab Sheik.
Since when does the gravesite of any of our forefathers constitute “private property”? And of whom?
If you want to be taken seriously as a journalist, and especially as a frum journalist, then do your homework [at the very least regarding halacha-related issues], and don’t write an uninformed opinion\editorial article, then pretend as if you were reporting the news objectively.
Y. Segal responds:
Dear Mrs. ____ ____,
…
You say “do your homework”. But lawyers are supposed to excel at research. An “authoritative mesora” on where Dan is buried: http://www.kolhazman.
The Ari’s list (he didn’t himself “compose”) was not intended to be exclusive (even assuming everything he said – or might have said – was recorded). The young, homebody, bookish, fresh immigrant from Egypt bears no better “tradition” on this, either, absent Ruach Hakodesh.
This whole land is ours (at a minimum by Jewish legal presumption), as both tribes and individuals, especially ancient, homesteaded areas, such as burial plots, and must all be privatized to avoid the Tragedy of the Commons. Historically, inventing Arab sheiks is not a safe bet. And had you not been a guild Bar Association-registered quasi-lawyer sworn to your patron regime, this after graduating from academic open-entry-limiting monopolies (university), you would not regard my axioms as anything but commonplace.
The current regime artificially limits the supply of land throughout our country, to confiscate taxes, and to subsidize licensed, inner-ring individuals like yourself to profit off notary make-work fees, a cartel-enforced violent wealth transfer. Is that innocent? Your anti-Jewish quasi-judges in the evil Arka’os continually evict Jews off properties duly acquired from Arabs but refuse to enforce their own professed zoning quasi-laws against enemy trespassers. Still just? Are the criminals discouraging Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount (and preventing our rebuilding the Temple), too, for noble intentions?!
…
Thanks for writing,
Yehuda Segal
For select Yehuda Segal articles, see here.
Why ‘Vechein’? Paying Close Attention to the Text
Avos Derebbe Nosson 16:5:
ושנאת הבריות כיצד, מלמד שלא יכווין אדם לומר אהוב את החכמים ושנא את התלמידים, אהוב את התלמידים ושנא את עמי הארץ, אלא אהוב את כולם, ושנא את האפיקורסין והמסיתים ומדיחין, וכן המסורות. וכן דוד אמר (תהלים קלט) “משנאיך ה’ אשנא ובתקוממיך אתקוטט תכלית שנאה שנאתים לאויבים היו לי” הלא הוא אומר (ויקרא יט) “ואהבת לרעך כמוך אני ה'” מה טעם, “כי אני בראתיו”. ואם עושה מעשה עמך אתה אוהבו, ואם לאו אי אתה אוהבו.
Why “vechein” by Mosrim, all of a sudden, last on the list?
I think it’s not part of the original. The “Mishna Rishona” had no need to mention them, since they had Jewish sovereignty. And the gloss was not hidden with a simple Vav.
What do you say?
עצה טובה לאשה: אל תהיי פמיניסטית
מנורת המאור (נר ג’ כלל ‘ו חלק ד’ פרק ב’):
אף על פי שהאשה היא בת זוגו של אדם, אל תחשוב בעיניה לבעלה כחבר, אלא כאדון. ועל זה אמר המשורר “כי הוא אדוניך והשתחוי לו” (תהלים מ”ה י”ב), והאשה תאהב לבעלה והוא ימשול בה, שנאמר “ואל אישך תשוקתך וגו'” (בראשית ג’ ט”ז) ואם יהא בעיניה כאדון, יאהבנה ותהא בעיניו כאחותו. כי מצינו לשרה שקראה לאברהם אדון שנאמר ואדוני זקן. ואם תמעט הדבור אלא לצורך תהא חביבה יותר על בעלה. ואם תדבר לפניו בחן ובענוה ויהיו עיניה תלויות לו כעיני שפחה אל יד גברתה אז תיקר ותכבד מאד בעיניו.
אמרו במדרש שצותה חכמה אחת לבתה כשהיתה מוליכה לבית בעלה. אמרה לה בתי, עמדי לפניו כלפני המלך ותשרתהו, ואם תהיי לו אמה, הוא יהיה לך עבד ויכבדך כגבירה, ואם תתגדלי עליו, יהיה לך לאדון בעל כרחך, ואז תהיי בעיניו נקלה כאחת השפחות.